Just saw a link minutes ago to a dossier on Donald Trump

If Putin has been behind all these alleged activities, UN should take action to hold him accountable.

Congress should also consider some accountability actions, he has allegedly walked all over redlines by powerful US leader besides attacking US supported Islamic militants in Syria.

2013-obama-putin-red-lines-toon.jpg



f127f5df04b3f55af173b17e5cad5764943bb4b186d8c870b88f471da2fb9a35_1.jpg





I wonder if this thread will reach >40 pages like the Pizzagate thread.

Do you have link.. which thread had 40 pages?

There was a link here yesterday that had only one page.
 
If I can recall correctly...I think I mentioned that the Germans have a good chance of having a file on Ron Paul, unfortunately, and something like this can be released by them as well.
 
More fake news. This was a 4chan hoax that CNN and the NYTimes actually ran.

Huh, strange. CNN and NYTimes are usually pretty good at maintaining a pretty high journalistic standard.

Almost as good as Fox
 
I didn't actually claim this about Ron Paul. I claimed that the Ron Paul campaign had a Russian involvement. Whether he knew about it or not, I don't know, but I suspect some of his associates could have known about it. And if MI6 had a dossier in their hands like the one they had on Trump, I suspect that a dossier about Ron Paul 2008/2012 could also be in the possession of MI6 or German intelligence already (I did see his name pop up in a few German graphs about Russian activity in the West). And investigations by the FBI into and around Ron Paul will likely take after British or German intelligence as the current dossier has done to prompt FBI and CIA investigations into Donald Trump.

The buzzfeed article says it came from a man who claimed to be from MI6, so there is no proof or claims it is even from MI6, just a claim it is from a man who claims to be from MI6. You need to read the article you are basing your wild fantasies on.

buzzfeed published a dossier from a LARPer
 
What more proof do you need of Russian infiltration than people actually disbelieving a Buzzfeed article


Quite possible but it only says how stupid the government is. In any case it won't be worse than what we've had so far. Talk about incompetence! :cool:
 
Trump should be tried for treason.

Trump should be tried for treason for exposing the incompetence of our intelligence agencies.
 
If I can recall correctly...I think I mentioned that the Germans have a good chance of having a file on Ron Paul, unfortunately, and something like this can be released by them as well.

Whoa.

It takes a special kind of insanity to think Angela Merkel makes for a convincing boogey man. You guys have better luck with Putin and even that's a long-shot.
 
Don't forget that Trump is actually a Hillary plant put in place by the elites - so this is all just for show.

You do have a point. Maybe trump was picked, because Hillary's health has being weak. Both Trump and Hillary had business with Moscow at one point.
 
Putting aside the whole 4chan issue and just focusing on the story that we know about for certain, there is absolutely nothing that verifies any of this. It's all based on hearsay and other flimsy sourcing and is just a bunch of allegations by an intelligence community that hates the man that won the presidency. That man, by the way, isn't just doing things that community disagrees with (being friendly to Russia), but has also said that he wants to slim them down significantly. Basically, they are worried about their jobs, which is why all of this is happening.

And, BTW, if the goal is to stop Trump from taking office, then it needs to be called out as the coup attempt it is. These deep state members are not friends of this country or of liberty.
Good point.
 
Well you're a Russian troll and citing the usual disinformation websites that already know how to spin information. The man and his father otherwise have PhD's in disinformation if there can be such a thing.

He's right. It isn't legit. 4chan has done some pretty impressive stuff like fooling liberals into using a safety pins which was actually gay signalling for asking for getting it in the rear with a condom. Ask yourself, do you really think this info wouldn't have come out during the election where people were offering serious money for any information on Trump?
 

This dossier comes from a former MI6 agent and the allegations and sources implicated are far too intimate for 4chan posters to be responsible for it (but such posters are nonetheless responsible for hacks and propaganda, "meme magic" as they call it, that otherwise derailed elections in the last year and may stand a good chance of being arrested for sedition if they aren't Russian). It's one thing to have 4chan users say they are responsible for this and leave it at that, but to promote it in high Russian disinformation channels just makes the Russian attempt of a coverup very sloppy. Newsweek also has a few articles about Russian interference in the election and their sources have been people working in foreign intelligence agencies. They reiterate the New York Times allegation that Manafort has been paid $12.7 million by Yanukovych and a secret meeting between him and Putin took place to make sure it couldn't be traced but with Putin walking away not believing Yanukovych, and mention that Russians were having second thoughts on Trump after he criticized the Khans. They even mention Estonians bugging a meeting between Trump staff and Russian officials. So what I'm saying is that the CIA has not really been involved with procuring such allegations so far but they can take the lead in investigating the allegations.
 
Last edited:
Lol. Theater of the absurd....

Sworn Donald Trump enemy John McCain admitted Wednesday that he passed the dossier of claims of a Russian blackmail plot against the president-elect.
The Arizona senator issued a public statement amid mounting questions of his exact role in the affair - and how a document riddled with errors and unverifiable claims came to be published.
'Late last year, I received sensitive information that has since been made public,' he said.
'Upon examination of the contents, and unable to make a judgment about their accuracy, I delivered the information to the Director of the FBI.


Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...emissary-abroad-collect-it.html#ixzz4VT3zms00
Follow us: [MENTION=19771]MAI[/MENTION]lOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook
 
More fake news. This was a 4chan hoax that CNN and the NYTimes actually ran.

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2017-01-10/4chan-claims-have-fabricated-anti-trump-report-hoax



https://medium.com/@therickwilson/fool-chan-e97fba24384f#.vwkgfqya7

Fool Chan

I’m not BuzzFeed’s source. Since their source was anonymous, and I don’t know who it was, I’ll settle it this way; if — arguendo — I had been their source, I hereby release the authors of the story, its editors, and BuzzFeed generally from any off-the-record/background protections of anonymity I would have asked for. Over to you, folks.

More broadly, as regards the British memo run in BuzzFeed, I release ANY journalist I’ve talked to about Trump from any off-the-record/background protections of anonymity. Why? Because the first time I saw the memo was when BuzzFeed published it. I’ve never had possession of that memo, never shared it, never pitched it, and never requested or caused others to do so. Allegations from the memo were making the rounds in the IC, political, and media worlds, to be sure, but its origins are elsewhere.

If you believe the Russian/4chan spin that this information came from them, you can’t use a calendar, or common sense. This information on Trump’s various personal and business dealings in Russia was being pursued by major campaigns and by major media to my knowledge as early as late July of 2015, and the “Ritz Carlton” information was out in the summer of 2016.

The allegations I “took the memo to the CIA” (or caused others to do the same) are utterly, entirely, and profoundly false and risible.
The information out there wasn’t from anonymous deep-cover chan-children. Unless, of course, many current and former senior IC and diplomatic officials here and abroad are secret weebs.

The vast majority of stories we worked were about Trump’s financials and his relationship — and that of his team — with Russian interests. This was — to my estimate — as significant a compromise as anything in the sexual arena. He could easily refute and dismiss the financial ties by opening his tax returns and his books to scrutiny, but we know that’s not happening.

The real shame of this entire situation is that we’re wasting valuable time Trump could be using to uncover the real secrets of John Podesta and Hillary Clinton’s PizzaGate global child kidnapping and cannibalism ring. You know, the important stuff.

[UPDATE per a question] No, I did not commission the oppo report mentioned in the NYT.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top