Just got back from Anita Andrews

Yeah, enough chat on this matter.
Let's just communicate with our
MEET-UP teams, (not the forum),
and get to work. :)

Let's make Ron Paul our next President!
 
Last edited:
First off, she has some good stuff to say and a lot of good training for those have never worked on a campaign before. I would encourage everyone to go.

However, there was something a bit off with her whole presentation.

Basically,I got the idea that this was her first chance to consult a national campaign, so she took it. But she isn't sure she wants to really, fully be associated with Ron Paul. (Hence, her name not being on the webpage untill recently, her email is not a Ron Paul email, etc.)

Also, she made a number of wierd statements:

-She threatened to sue anyone who gave her materials away.
-She claimed she worked on a campaign that was outspent 32 million to 300 thousand and still won. Only senate campaigns reach the 30 million mark. There has not been that big of a senate upset in decades.
-She claims she worked on a campaign in which the headquarters were blown up.


Anyways, I know there was alot of talk about her. Just my 2 cents.

This is NOT right.

Use some common sense here, people, this is a scam artist. I don't care how slick or experienced she may seem to you; this person is lying to you.

Campaign headquarters blown up?

300 thousand vs 32 million campaign victory?

These things did NOT happen. This person is lying. Even if she seems well intentioned. We don't know what her agenda is, whether she is an infiltrator or just a scam artist here to make money, but this is NOT right.

And threatening to personally sue you for disclosing information presented under contract with the campaign headquarters?

This indicates something seriously amiss. Either her contacts within the national campaign who hired her are naive as well, probably volunteers themselves, or they too are not aware of what she is up to out on the East coast.
 
This is NOT right.

Use some common sense here, people, this is a scam artist. I don't care how slick or experienced she may seem to you; this person is lying to you.

Campaign headquarters blown up?

300 thousand vs 32 million campaign victory?

These things did NOT happen. This person is lying. Even if she seems well intentioned. We don't know what her agenda is, whether she is an infiltrator or just a scam artist here to make money, but this is NOT right.

And threatening to personally sue you for disclosing information presented under contract with the campaign headquarters?

This indicates something seriously amiss. Either her contacts within the national campaign who hired her are naive as well, probably volunteers themselves, or they too are not aware of what she is up to out on the East coast.

Anita just left here. She is legit. She is in it to win it. She has very good ideas, and presents them very clearly.

My reservations about her are gone. If she comes to your area, go and meet her. If you can't go, find someone who has and discuss the training with them face to face.

At the very least, even if you dislike the strategy she presents, you will learn some very interesting information about the campaign's future plans.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top