MsDoodahs
Senior
- Joined
- May 10, 2007
- Messages
- 11,373
My concerns center on two points.
First, the report that Anita tells groups she has sued in the past and will do it again if the people who hear her info dare to discuss it with the rest of us. IMO that is intended to intimidate group members and therefore increase her control over those groups. Her use of the lawsuit threat has also been quite divisive. Neither of these outcomes is positive for the campaign.
Second, the report that Anita openly stated that she is unsure she even wants to be associated with Ron Paul. She may as well have told the group, "look, your guy is a kook and working with this campaign may hurt my career ambitions, so I'm not really sure I want to bother."
Yet she is on the payroll? Excuse me for asking, but ... WTF?
Does Ron know she's saying that kind of crap to his supporters?
Would she be on the payroll if he did?
I've put a lot of faith and trust in folks I've never met and know only from this forum, as evidenced by contributions to their projects. Their words here have revealed their passion and dedication to Dr. Paul's campaign. If the report re: her comment that she is not sure she wants to be associated with Dr. Paul is true, then I ask you: where is her passion and dedication, and if she does not have any, why is she in this role?
First, the report that Anita tells groups she has sued in the past and will do it again if the people who hear her info dare to discuss it with the rest of us. IMO that is intended to intimidate group members and therefore increase her control over those groups. Her use of the lawsuit threat has also been quite divisive. Neither of these outcomes is positive for the campaign.
Second, the report that Anita openly stated that she is unsure she even wants to be associated with Ron Paul. She may as well have told the group, "look, your guy is a kook and working with this campaign may hurt my career ambitions, so I'm not really sure I want to bother."
Yet she is on the payroll? Excuse me for asking, but ... WTF?
Does Ron know she's saying that kind of crap to his supporters?
Would she be on the payroll if he did?
I've put a lot of faith and trust in folks I've never met and know only from this forum, as evidenced by contributions to their projects. Their words here have revealed their passion and dedication to Dr. Paul's campaign. If the report re: her comment that she is not sure she wants to be associated with Dr. Paul is true, then I ask you: where is her passion and dedication, and if she does not have any, why is she in this role?