Julian Assange Arrested on U.S. Extradition Warrant, London Police Say

:up: Gullible idiot Here. Actually, I would like to look at it more like optimistic rather than gullible. Lots of negative nay-bobs who are quite gullible to the fake news too.

I pray our country heals and the truth come to light.

The fact that Assange has survived and is making it to the US is the worst news for Hillary (who one time opined about droning him) and GREAT news that the plan is working. He is and will be remembered as a hero who, together with Trump, brought down much of the DS.

Let them call you names donnay! It makes the show even more funny actually!
 
Trump's comments today are about as disgusting as you could possibly imagine.
 
What is wrong with saying he knows nothing about Wikileaks? He probably means that he knows of Julian Assange and of Wikileaks but knows nothing about charges or what the Attorney General has in the works. I could own a Stanley Works tool but not know anything about Stanley Works.
 
What is wrong with saying he knows nothing about Wikileaks? He probably means that he knows of Julian Assange and of Wikileaks but knows nothing about charges or what the Attorney General has in the works. I could own a Stanley Works tool but not know anything about Stanley Works.
In the debates he quoted WikiLeaks like it was scripture he said he loved WikiLeaks and hated the fake news. He should have a better opinion than no opinion.
 
In the debates he quoted WikiLeaks like it was scripture he said he loved WikiLeaks and hated the fake news. He should have a better opinion than no opinion.

There wasn't an indictment during that time. Different things are different. At that time, Trump viewed Assange like the rest of us, a journalist and WikiLeaks a protected publisher. Now there is an indictment of Assange by Trumps own administration. If it is true he helped Manning break into a government system, that does change things for me as well, he's no longer just a journalist immune from prosecution. Manning had to face our court system, seems like Assange will as well.
 
What is wrong with saying he knows nothing about Wikileaks? He probably means that he knows of Julian Assange and of Wikileaks but knows nothing about charges or what the Attorney General has in the works. I could own a Stanley Works tool but not know anything about Stanley Works.

Wikileaks has outlived its usefulness for Trump. They can be tossed aside now. "Never heard of them".

 
There wasn't an indictment during that time. Different things are different. At that time, Trump viewed Assange like the rest of us, a journalist and WikiLeaks a protected publisher. Now there is an indictment of Assange by Trumps own administration. If it is true he helped Manning break into a government system, that does change things for me as well, he's no longer just a journalist immune from prosecution. Manning had to face our court system, seems like Assange will as well.

What a bunch of balderdash.

Manning is another hero. The dirty, lying, corrupt, rogue government filled with psychopaths now led by a idiotic, egotistical liar is the criminal and has been for years.

Doesn't Ron Paul count for anything anymore?



When do the killers "have to face our court system"?



I can't wait to leave the US.
 
What is wrong with saying he knows nothing about Wikileaks? He probably means that he knows of Julian Assange and of Wikileaks but knows nothing about charges or what the Attorney General has in the works. I could own a Stanley Works tool but not know anything about Stanley Works.

Yep, this is what happens when a bunch of toolbags who hate Trump and love the establishment try and turn something Trump said into something completely different.
 
What is wrong with saying he knows nothing about Wikileaks? He probably means that he knows of Julian Assange and of Wikileaks but knows nothing about charges or what the Attorney General has in the works. I could own a Stanley Works tool but not know anything about Stanley Works.
He's the fucking president. His administration, over the course of two years and with the approval of his direct subordinates, has methodically and publicly hatched a plan to imprison Assange. If Trump doesn't know anything about the coordinated plans of Trump's State department, Trump's CIA, and Trump's department of Justice, that is Trump's fault.

Either he's throwing WikiLeaks under the bus or he's incompetent; pick one.
 
Assange Has Been Arrested For US Extradition. The Time To Act Is Now.

..........
This is seriously gut wrenching news. Here are ten thoughts on the matter in no particular order:

1 — The Metropolitan police were let into the embassy by the Ecuadorian ambassador, his political asylum revoked under entirely false pretenses in gross violation of international law. Shame on Ecuador.

2 — Assange is an Australian citizen. As of this writing, the Australian government has still not interceded to protect its citizen. Shame on Australia.

3 — The US government is setting a precedent which, if carried out, will constitute a grave threat to press freedoms the world over and a greater leap in the direction of Orwellian dystopia than the Patriot Act. Shame on America.

4 — The UK government is collaborating with the US government’s efforts to imprison a journalist for publishing evidence of US war crimes, just as it has collaborated with the US government in perpetrating war crimes. Shame on the UK.

5 — This arrest warrant was issued under the Trump administration, in full alignment with what the Trump administration has openly been saying about its agenda to silence WikiLeaks. Shame on Trump, and shame on anyone who continues to support him.

6 — This arrest is a Trump administration action, and has nothing to do with the 2016 Russia nonsense that Democrats have been shrieking about, yet these same Democrats who claim to oppose Trump and oppose his war on the press are currently cheerleading for Trump’s prosecution of a journalist who told the truth. Shame on Democrats.

7 — I am going to have a zero tolerance policy for QAnon cultists who try to tell me that this is actually 5-D chess by Trump to overthrow the Deep State. Stay out of my comments, stay out of my social media notifications, stay the hell away from me, and please rethink your worldview.

8 — The precedent set by imprisoning a foreign journalist under the Espionage Act will enable the US government to arrest leak publishers anywhere in the world who expose its crimes. This will cripple our ability to hold the most powerful institution on the planet to account in any way. There is no excuse for any journalist anywhere not to oppose this tooth and claw. If you see anyone calling themselves a journalist but failing to oppose Assange’s extradition, you should call them out for the frauds that they are.

9 — And yes, like it or not, Assange is a journalist. There is no legitimate argument to the contrary.

10 — This is it, folks. This is where we find out what we’re made of as a species. This is where we find out if humanity gets to survive, and if it deserves to. If we can’t stop the empire from imprisoning a journalist for publishing facts right in front of our eyes, we might as well roll over and tap out right now, because if we lose this one it’s never going to get any better from there. If we can’t pass this test, the oligarchs and the opaque government agencies which are allied with them will march us into extinction or Orwellian dystopia, and there’ll be no tool in our toolbox to stop them. We need to seriously dig deep on this one.

http://www.ronpaulinstitute.org/arc...ed-for-us-extradition-the-time-to-act-is-now/
 
Assuming he is successfully extradited (legal experts say there is a chance he might be able to successfully fight extradition, despite the blatant antipathy expressed toward him by British judges), Julian Assange will stand trial in a courtroom in Alexandria, Virginia where prosecutors from the Eastern District of Virginia will try to prove that he broke US law by goading Chelsea Manning into turning over hundreds of thousands of classified documents.
To recap: Prosecutors surprised Assange's supporters when they revealed in their extradition warrant that, rather than pursuing him on espionage charges, or charges related to Wikileaks' publication of the classified documents, only one charge had been levied against Assange: conspiracy to hack a government computer.
Screen%20Shot%202019-04-11%20at%205.10.16%20PM.png

If convicted, he could face a maximum of five and a half years in prison.
In the Assange indictment, prosecutors claimed that after Manning had already handed over hundreds of thousands of documents to Wikileaks, Assange tried to help the former Army private and intelligence analyst crack a password that would have allowed her to access hundreds of thousands of documents.
However, Assange never succeeded in cracking the password, at least not as far as prosecutors are aware. What he did allegedly do was conspire with Manning to transmit the documents she had succeeded in stealing, while - and this is key - encouraging Manning to turn over more documents when she expressed reluctance.
To support its case, the government has obtained chat logs from March 2010 showing Manning communicating with a mysterious individual who alternatively went by the handles "Ox" and "pressassociation". The government believes this user was Assange. After transmitting hundreds of thousands of war logs from Iraq and Afghanistan and detainee assessment briefs from Guantanamo Bay, Manning said her stash of secret documents had run dry.
"After this upload, that’s all I really have got left."
To which her co-conspirator replied: "Curious eyes never run dry in my experience."
The indictment also references a claim made by Manning during her court martial statement that she had discussed the value of the Guantanamo detainee assessments with the person alleged to be Assange.
"During my conversation with Nathaniel, I asked him if he thought the DABs were of any use to anyone. Nathaniel indicated, although he did not believe that they were of political significance, he did believe that they could be used to merge into the general historical account of what occurred at Guantanamo."
Manning added: "After this discussion, I decided to download the data."
That's it.
As for how they intend to conclusively prove that Assange was the individual who corresponded with Manning on the Jabber chat service they were using...well...that hasn't yet been revealed.

More at: https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2019...st-assange-hinges-one-critical-piece-evidence
 
8 — The precedent set by imprisoning a foreign journalist under the Espionage Act will enable the US government to arrest leak publishers anywhere in the world who expose its crimes. This will cripple our ability to hold the most powerful institution on the planet to account in any way. There is no excuse for any journalist anywhere not to oppose this tooth and claw. If you see anyone calling themselves a journalist but failing to oppose Assange’s extradition, you should call them out for the frauds that they are.

We are already there. Michael Hastings.
 
Probably has nothing to do with the inking of a globalist IMF 'loan' to Ecuador of $4 billion. Naw. That would be a hell of a coincidence.
 
Probably has nothing to do with the inking of a globalist IMF 'loan' to Ecuador of $4 billion. Naw. That would be a hell of a coincidence.

Probably had nothing to do with Wikileaks putting out personal photos and information on Ecuador's leader. Demand free food, room and board, and internet and then go after your host who is paying for all of that.

https://www.cnbc.com/2019/04/05/ecuador-denies-decision-made-to-expel-wikileaks-founder.html

On Tuesday, Moreno blamed WikiLeaks for recent allegations of offshore corruption that in appeared in local media outlets and the publication of family photos to social media.

Moreno accused WikiLeaks of intercepting phone calls and private conversations as well as “photos of my bedroom, what I eat, and how my wife and daughters and friends dance.”
 
Back
Top