Judge Napolitano's FBN debut of FreedomWatch is a Winfest!

I liked it a lot. I was counting the number of times Palin mentioned the Obama administration, I kinda wish the Judge or Ron or Rand had been like..."well, yeah it isn't just about the Democratic Administration currently in power..."

But I know, at least it seems to me that he's watered down the show so they aren't as radical for live TV, I understand it was the debut, but I hope it gets more radical (which I'm sure it will as it goes on)

I'm glad I tivoed it even though I watched it live because the boy got a phone call and missed Ron and Rand so we just re-winded it when it was over. lol
 
Sarah Palin is a phony ass neo-con bitch:

Supported the Bailout theft
Supports war with Iran
Supported RINO McCain over Hayworth
Supported RINO Fiorina over DeVore
Supported RINO Perry over Medina
Jumped on the Rand Paul and Nickki Haley bandwagons after they were both already way ahead.
Supported Israel's mass murder in Gaza
Supported Israel's recent act of murderous piracy (in which a US citizen took 4 bullets to the head)

Take George Bush, shave 100 points off of his already low IQ, put a skirt on him and voila!....You have Sarah Palin.
 
Sarah still opting for the Federal government to interfere in our businesses and everyday lives whereas RP sees no important use for the feds other than protection our rights.
She still wants to be involved in big government.
 
Last edited:
sofia said:
Sarah Palin is a phony ass neo-con bitch:

Supported the Bailout theft
Supports war with Iran
Supported RINO McCain over Hayworth
Supported RINO Fiorina over DeVore
Supported RINO Perry over Medina
Jumped on the Rand Paul and Nickki Haley bandwagons after they were both already way ahead.
Supported Israel's mass murder in Gaza
Supported Israel's recent act of murderous piracy (in which a US citizen took 4 bullets to the head)

Take George Bush, shave 100 points off of his already low IQ, put a skirt on him and voila!....You have Sarah Palin.
Click to expand...

Very good points. Also supported the so-called "surge" and a bunch of other mindless crap no doubt.

It seems that by having Palin on, this show is just the anti-Obama show. I'm sure the PTB would LOVE us to all rally behind the cause of dumping Obama, when they know full well that the next guy or woman will be no different and probably even worse. Palin is not to be trusted and neither is the tea party.
 
Ohhh and I also loved how the Judge kept referring to Rand as a Libertarian and he didn't correct him. lol He really does say different things depending on his audience at the time.
 
I think its good to have opposing points of view so that the Judge can call out the disagreements. Makes it more entertaining. ;)
 
I look at it as a way to bring in folks that might not listen otherwise, and then the fun begins.

Haven't watched it yet, but I agree, I hope it gets to be more in your face as time goes on.
 
Pacis said:
Meh. I don't see anything promising about the Tea Party and figures like Palin and DeMint. I'll watch Ron Paul's bits and skip the rest. I wish Napolitano had guests like Lew Rockwell or the other columnists at his site for the broadcast debut.
Click to expand...

Palin I agree with you about, and Tea Party candidates in general, but not DeMint. DeMint is far better than the average senator in my opinion. Remember, DeMint was a key figure in helping our effort to audit the fed in the senate.

And the candidates being elected to congress this time will be slightly better at least than the candidates that got elected last time when the republicans got congress under their control, I think. I'm getting the feeling they will be a little more conservative fiscally at least. I'm not so sure about things like ending the wars, ending the drug war, and so on though.
 
This tv show debut feels like we've established a beachhead for the liberty movement to come ashore.
 
One thing Woodrow Wilson accomplished was to divide us into fragmented groups...Republicans, Democrats, independents, libertarians, constitutionalists. blacks, whites, Mexicans...anything but Americans.

The wise purpose of the Judge's first show was to unite us, because if we can be divided over a 10% disagreement, the opposition wins. They will seek to put a wedge in this unity that the Judge seeks to build.
 
therepublic said:
One thing Woodrow Wilson accomplished was to divide us into fragmented groups...Republicans, Democrats, independents, libertarians, constitutionalists. blacks, whites, Mexicans...anything but Americans.

The wise purpose of the Judge's first show was to unite us, because if we can be divided over a 10% disagreement, the opposition wins. They will seek to put a wedge in this unity that the Judge seeks to build.
Click to expand...

Actually, I think he exacerbated differences. I think that part was entirely unnecessary and unhelpful to this specific effort. Doubtless it drew some who wouldn't have come for one of the guests, just to see the disagreements, I guess.
 
sailingaway said:
Actually, I think he exacerbated differences. I think that part was entirely unnecessary and unhelpful to this specific effort. Doubtless it drew some who wouldn't have come for one of the guests, just to see the disagreements, I guess.
Click to expand...

I do not think we need to hide differences.
  • In the early days of this Country, people openly discussed differences...even in the local pubs. But propaganda began to tell us not to discuss politics and religion with anyone who might disagree with you. As a result we are having to learn all over again how to discuss these things in a respectful manner.

  • The opposition likes to take the differences, and twist their meaning. In the show Ron Paul explained not all libertarians agree with each other, and that he was pro-life. He also said, as per the Constitution, it as a State issue, and not a Federal issue. Did you see how the Democrat twisted what Ron said? So by being honest, the deception coming from the opposition is exposed.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top