That was such a cheap shot. What did that have anything to do with the question? Anyway...Paul handled it well by mentioning the donations. Didn't it seem like every time they addressed him, he had to play defense? First they selected a question that called him a conspiracy nut, then this, then they basically told him he had no shot at winning the nomination but to consider running as independent. He handled it well but man...let him talk about the issues, not make him defend himself against attacks all night. How was education and health care not talked about in this debate?