- Joined
- Jul 13, 2007
- Messages
- 63,472
Won't hurt him at all. The midwestern evangelical protestants loved them some frothy.
Interesting. The list of Catholic neoconservatives grows.
Hannity, Gingrich, Peter King, Santorum, Jeb Bush...
Won't hurt him at all. The midwestern evangelical protestants loved them some frothy.
Interesting. The list of Catholic neoconservatives grows.
Hannity, Gingrich, Peter King, Santorum, Jeb Bush...
Meh. The demographics of congress don't resemble American society either.
Yeah. It doesn't make sense. I'm black but the only people on the Supreme Court were black and hispanic, I'd be concerned. It would mean somebody is likely stacking the deck. The question is to what end?
Is Hannity a true neocon?I heard he was just a fanboy of the neocon movement.
Interesting. The list of Catholic neoconservatives grows.
Hannity, Gingrich, Peter King, Santorum, Jeb Bush...
I wonder when the elite got to this guy? His heritage & academic background is similar to O'Reilly. Irish, Roman Catholic, Metropolitan Area. I bet he fooled himself to think that he's doing god's work, so he signed on for this NWO gig, where they pay him handsomely.
It should be obvious, but to point it out once again, an elite group of Catholics with an agenda have no relation whatsoever to the average Catholic. This applies to any another other group where an elite of that group pushes an agenda, without the consent or even the knowledge of the average member of that group.
You might get banned for that type of talk.
Seriously though, America's political world has been dominated by Roman Catholics and Jews for over a hundred years. And you are right that Roman Catholic theology supports statism, intervention, redistribution of wealth, and foreign policy messianism.
(Of course this is just the opinion of Sola_Fide....feel free to disagree)
Perhaps they are just more organised? Protestants, almost by definition, can't collectively organise their way out of a paper bag and spend far to much time railing on homosexuality due to the closeted fears of the mega-preachers. Protestants have way more time, manpower and money, but seem to think stacking the political deck just isn't cricket.[SUP][/SUP]
They should be busy banning members and preachers who have credit cards, instead of focusing on the ones who are contagiously gay.
No, I don't think that is the reason. First of all, I have to qualify what I am going to say because I don't believe the majority of "protestants" are Christians. But I believe a Biblical worldview is anti statist and will always be the minority view in history. I believe a biblical Christian worldview is decidedly individualistic and not concerned with political action.
Read the Catholic Catechsim...it is as much a political document as a statement of faith. The Roman Catholic worldview is a political one. That is why they are so interested in this world. Their kingdom is a worldly kingdom. But Christ preached that His kingdom was not of this world.
Here is the RCC: http://www.accracatholic.org/files/Catechism-of-the-CatholicChurch-2nd-Edition.pdf Find the pages and passages that prove your claim for me.
It is the role of the state to defend and promote the common good of civil society. The common good of the whole human family calls for an organization of society on the international level.
Now we're on to something. Isn't it interesting how the United States was founded as a Protestant Christian nation, and at some point, this "Judeo-Christian" talking point was created? It almost seems like we are now "Judeo-Catholic", and Protestantism has become a dirty word. Perhaps that was a goal? Maybe the Kennedy family could give some answers?
It's apparent that someone in the know like Jeb Bush has found it to be advantageous to make it known that he is "no longer a WASP".
Catholics would tell you that they are Christian too and part of the Judeo-Christian thingy you are referencing.
*edit: As a former Catholic, it was never taught to me that Protestants were not fellow Christians but I was told by Protestants that being Catholic was not Christian. If you are looking for some conspiracy where Catholics are undermining Protestants, I just don't see it. Catholics don't tend to go out trying to convert Protestants but the Baptists around here do try that with Catholics.
It is the role of the state to defend and promote the common good of civil society. The common good of the whole human family calls for an organization of society on the international level.
Fr33, do you agree with this?
It is the role of the state to defend and promote the common good of civil society. The common good of the whole human family calls for an organization of society on the international level.
It's from the Catholic Catechism.
No. I'm no longer a Catholic but was just trying to add my perspective as a former one. So I'll do it for your quote: I've known a lot of Catholics that don't agree with the Vatican. Family tradition and belief in God is more important to them than what comes out of Rome. That is usually why they are Catholic.
I agree there are some Roman Catholics who detest the statism of Rome. When Lord Acton said "power corrupts, and absolute power corrupts absolutely", he was talking about the Pope. Look it up.
Okay, here's one:
The Catholic Catechism calls for an international statist role to "defend the common good". If that isn't statist, then what world do you live on?
No, I don't think that is the reason. First of all, I have to qualify what I am going to say because I don't believe the majority of "protestants" are Christians. But I believe a Biblical worldview is anti statist and will always be the minority view in history. I believe a biblical Christian worldview is decidedly individualistic and not concerned with political action.
Read the Catholic Catechsim...it is as much a political document as a statement of faith. The Roman Catholic worldview is a political one. That is why they are so interested in this world. Their kingdom is a worldly kingdom. But Christ preached that His kingdom was not of this world.
Why do you bother with this catholic propaganda?The quote says "an organization of society". That could be parsed many, many ways. Perhaps it means via Cathlic charities or theological think tanks or something. We can't know without reading the whole thing or asking the writer.
Here is just one international RC charity: http://www.crs.org/