JD Vance agrees with Ron Paul on the Federal Reserve:

[TheTexan]

I'm curious who this friend of his is. Doubt its somebody that's close to the Trump campaign.

I assume the friend who is a "Ron Paul guy" he's talking about is DJT

 

[FineSpeech]

Perhaps it's Vivek Ramaswamy?

 

[Swordsmyth]

It's better late than never but it's happening on the banker's schedule, not ours. Always has been. The Hegelian solution? Why gold backed digital non-money cbdc (or similar), of course. But the bankers have the gold and we have digits on a smartphone screen.....

Clearly this is all on the A2030/Great Reset schedule and the solutions are being sold by the faces on the screens in a planned and coordinated fashion. Anyone who doesn't realize/understand this yet is pretty slow.

Pure nonsense, Trump said he will outlaw a CBDC.

You are grasping at phantom straws.

 

[pmbug]

Perhaps it's Vivek Ramaswamy?

That was my initial thought.

 

[Occam's Banana]

I'll believe it when I see it in action.

Don't hold your breath, because you quite likely are not going to see it in action.

The reality is that most are just fed up with how braindead 'MAGA' is and how no 'MAGA' politicians or writers want to advance libertarian policies. The majority of them are openly against libertarianism and look down upon it and just see it a a pipeline to some form of authoritarianism. JD Vance of all people is what they're hyping up to be 'the future' in right-wing politics.

And yet, we won't be hearing Harris or any other Democrat saying anything even remotely like this:

https://twitter.com/beinlibertarian/status/1850328194475303377

Now, you might reply that Vance is just giving empty "lip service" to the opponents of central banking and the Federal Reserve, or that he really doesn't mean it, or that he won't actually do anything about it if he becomes VP, and so on. And I would be strongly inclined to agree - one or all of those things may be (probably are ?) correct.

But it doesn't matter - because there is still something to our advantage to be gained from it. Even if he doesn't mean a single word of it, and it's all just a pack of deliberate and intentional lies, then that "lip service" nevertheless still helps to "normalize" skepticism of central banking and moves the so-called "Overton Window" in our favor by giving greater social visibility, currency, and credibility to criticisms of and opposition to the Federal Reserve in particular and central banking in general. That is worth something, at least, and it's worth a good deal more than we'll ever get from Harris or the Democrats - even if Vance, et al. are lying through their teeth. (Vance even does us the courtesy of explicitly admitting that he is "actually not a Ron Paul guy" - so he deserves at least some credit for not trying to trick anyone into thinking he's "one of us".)

As for all the "braindead 'MAGA'" crowd, either they matter or they don't - but if they do, then how is it a bad thing for their leaders to expose them to t he notion that central banking and the Federal Reserve might not be such great things, after all?

 

[Occam's Banana]

Now, you might reply that Vance is just giving empty "lip service" to the opponents of central banking and the Federal Reserve, or that he really doesn't mean it, or that he won't actually do anything about it if he becomes VP, and so on. And I would be strongly inclined to agree - one or all of those things may be (probably are ?) correct.

But it doesn't matter - because there is still something to our advantage to be gained from it. Even if he doesn't mean a single word of it, and it's all just a pack of deliberate and intentional lies, then that "lip service" nevertheless still helps to "normalize" skepticism of central banking and moves the so-called "Overton Window" in our favor by giving greater social visibility, currency, and credibility to criticisms of and opposition to the Federal Reserve in particular and central banking in general. That is worth something, at least, and it's worth a good deal more than we'll ever get from Harris or the Democrats - even if Vance, et al. are lying through their teeth. (Vance even does us the courtesy of explicitly admitting that he is "actually not a Ron Paul guy" - so he deserves at least some credit for not trying to trick anyone into thinking he's "one of us".)

As for all the "braindead 'MAGA'" crowd, either they matter or they don't - but if they do, then how is it a bad thing for their leaders to expose them to t he notion that central banking and the Federal Reserve might not be such great things, after all?

They understand this ↑↑ at RPI.

https://x.com/RonPaulInstitut/status/1851119931745517981

 

[Occam's Banana]

https://x.com/RonPaul/status/1852397451031859235

 

[Occam's Banana]

THREAD: With JD Vance and Elon Musk, suddenly ideas are back in this campaign

 

[TheTexan]

It's happening

#winning

 

[Matt Collins]

Elon and Mike Lee's talk of ending the Fed are discussed in this video:






https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eFHhGqLggNc

​

 

[Matt Collins]

Elon Musk reposts call to end the US Federal Reserve Bank:



https://cointelegraph.com/news/elon-musk-reposts-call-end-federal-reserve-bank