Japanese nuclear plant may only have a few hours....

Japan to Move Capitol ?

http://www.novinite.com/view_news.php?id=127294

Hell of a picture at the link

photo_verybig_127294.jpg


What the hell is burning there?
 
According to experts, should a 7.2 magnitude earthquake shake Tokyo, the casualties will be around 11 000, some 210 000 will be injured and the material damage will be worth about USD 1 B

And exactly how much will it cost to move, lock, stock and barrel, Tokyo?

As we saw with the Kobe quake, no guarantees an earthquake won't strike in Osaka.
I reckon they should move Tokyo to Alice Springs. It would be safe from earthquakes and radiation.
 
so the little news we're getting from the media about this, kind of makes me worry. it's like they're covering up something. how about the japanese current that flows up by alaska, are the fish in the pacific going to be contaminated? Have the japanese asked us not to make a big deal out of this or they will not loan us any more money? Seems way to quite.....

I saw this in the comment section of the Oil Drum (which is fascinating IMO)

Iaato on April 14, 2011:
"Ugh, it's here at 61 North. I brought groceries in and scanned them; the food was clean, but the front carpet was approximately double background, ~12-15 clicks per minute. Alaskans take their shoes off at the door; and the rug is washable. But it's here. No more seafood for me.


Goodmanj on April 14, 2011: Interesting. What was your rug like before Fukushima? You're doing a controlled experiment, right?

Right?

Iaato on April 14: You bet, a daily time series. The rug has been the same as background daily, 5-10 CPM, until now. I have now rolled up the other area rugs in the house, and will cover the raised beds tomorrow."

http://radiationnetwork.com/AlaskaHawaii.htm These people have set up their own monitoring system and it also shows their results for all of USA. Arizona and South of Montreal look highest but still not constituting a major alert. However if the thing keeps leaking....
 
Last edited:
Notice the heat picture at the beginning of this page. If the explosion at reactor 3 was the core it may have horked up its innards and the heat lines by the tower at the top of the page may be rods. MOX rods?

http://www.houseoffoust.com/fukushima/R3.html

Somewhere they showed pictures of possible rod casing circled on the ground (car near by for comparison). I was thinking these are the same but I can't seem to find the picture. I also thought there was a something showing how long the rod packages are. Can't find that either.

Also did you see how the explosion of three bowed in the wall on four?


P.S. I finally found the pictures I was looking for on this page.

http://www.houseoffoust.com/fukushima/rods.html
 
Last edited:
You can't use current models to predict cancer rates either! See video and other information at llrc.org


Here at 9:30 he relates how two Russian researchers he talked to at a Berlin conference told him that the Chernobyl explosion had a nuclear component.The whole video is interesting as he talks about another Russian fuel rod explosion in the fiftys.

 
Last edited:
Yah. We've got that going for us.

P.S. Sort of looks to be holding a bridle though!
 
Last edited:
Notice the heat picture at the beginning of this page. If the explosion at reactor 3 was the core it may have horked up its innards and the heat lines by the tower at the top of the page may be rods. MOX rods?Q
http://www.houseoffoust.com/fukushima/R3.html

Whereever I look in the pictures, I see rods (like the pics when you are a kid and you have to find monkeys and birds hiding in trees) when they are probably only part of the external structure.
If it was R3, yes they would be mox and I would prefer they did not explode out of of a reactor well. (for the poor bastards' sakes who work there.)


Somewhere they showed pictures of possible rod casing circled on the ground (car near by for comparison). I was thinking these are the same but I can't seem to find the picture. I also thought there was a something showing how long the rod packages are. Can't find that either.

Also did you see how the explosion of three bowed in the wall on four?

Yeah that's not pretty.
 
Last edited:
bump for way to quiet

way to quiet. and also upon reading news i find this this morning; mind u not a US article; but from the UK about here!
Largest tornado outbreak on record leaves 45 dead and thousands homeless... and forecasts say more violent storms are on the way




I will also mention that a couple of nights ago; i had watched a guy on youtube about weather, haarp, etc.... He had predicted "something" to happen in this area! he thought it would be either a big storm or EQ. Here's the storm. and there has been some small seismic activity in ARK over the last week as well.
 
Last edited:
Here is the update:
http://www.cnn.com/2011/WORLD/asiapcf/04/19/japan.nuclear.reactors/index.html?eref=rss_topstories

Sent in robots to reactor 2. Its 100+F, 99% humidity, lots of tons of water missing, assumed is flooding tunnels and turbine room.
Cameras fogged up, had to pull them out. Says time to send in the humans again...

Why does the robot camera not have a plexiglass sealed box around it with a wiper blade or something ffs...
Why are they not dumping boron sand and concrete into this mess yet, what do they think there is left to salvage.
Someone needs to start a class action lawsuit against TEPCO, Japan, the international nuclear oversight for allowing this level 7 event to continue in open air.
 
At least in Russia, the techs had the common sense to seal the damn thing. What are these guys waiting for?
 
Back
Top