Jake Tapper nails Trump on "Mexican" judge comments in utterly mad interview

Status
Not open for further replies.
WND is where you go when you want your biases confirmed and are afraid to confront reality.
 
WND is more popular and more groundbreaking than Jake Tapper, and a various combinations of other news aggregation.

One of the few websites to point out Walter Jones was the conservative & populist choice of voters.

Taylor Griffin was using NeverTrump tactics & material to call him a liberal.
 
WND said Walter Jones is a good guy. CNN said nothing.

WND talks shit to Bush & Dick Cheney just like Trump & Walter.
 
The cases started in 2010; Trump's politics were completely different then.

I agree that he's been all over the map on some things but he's been pretty consistent on his core issues like foreign policy and bad trade deals:

 
Do you believe "diversity" is a code word for white genocide?

Depends on where it is and who is pushing it and a genocide agenda can be applied to people of any race or culture. There's a lot of natural diversity in some places and in others it's pure social engineering. In the case of a place like Sweden, it is most certainly deliberate destruction of the white gentile population and culture. Do you have a problem with acknowledging that fact?
 
WND is where you go when you want your biases confirmed and are afraid to confront reality.

I only read there when someone posts an article in a thread. Like any place, some of their stuff is very good and some not so much (personal opinion).

Do tell what 'reality' you are privy to that others are not.
 
It's entirely possible for Trump and his lawyers to have suspected a bias against Trump, from the beginning, and then further gaining more information about the judge leading to more concerns about bias. That said...

You just said that calling out illegal immigration is "vitriol".

lol

Are you a no borders libertarian? An internationalist? A Utopian? A Marxist?

: popcorn :

Proof? Oh, yeah modern era requires one just toss words at another individual and demand the accused prove the non-existence to the satisfaction of the accuser who harbored an ax to grind. :rolleyes: October 2014, he never filed against the judge and still has no proof prior to his wall issue.

Perhaps it is that I don't cotton to your flavor of dictator in chief and until y'all decide to let me and mine out of that social contract (no, I don't owe you money for the privilege and I won't move to Somalia) that demands your decisions have any authority within my household, I'll keep on pointing out your wanna be emperor's short comings.
 
WND is more popular and more groundbreaking than Jake Tapper, and a various combinations of other news aggregation.

One of the few websites to point out Walter Jones was the conservative & populist choice of voters.

Taylor Griffin was using NeverTrump tactics & material to call him a liberal.

Who is Walter Jones?

Tapper is a Zionist, globalist Jew and professional liar. I followed the demonstrations, followed by a coup, followed by a war in Ukraine, very closely for about 15 months. I mean closely as in being online about 12 hours per day, watching hundreds of videos and reading Ukrainian and Russian sites every day. Tapper, Jim Schuito (sp) and Chris Cuomo were CNN's point men for anti Russia/anti Putin/anti DPR-LPR (east Ukraine separatists) propaganda. The lies were so over the top and outrageous that it was hard to even believe. Right up there with the State Dept and Victoria Nuland. They all pushed the lie that the DPR shot down the Malaysian airliner, as well. There's nothing they won't lie about (though that's routine with the MSM). Being globalists is cause enough to despise Trump. The stuff about Trump and the KKK (remember that nonsense?) came from the ADL and it was Tapper who was first to push it on TV. They LOVE using the false charge of racism as a weapon. For Zionist Jews, any talk of nationalism/sovereignty is only acceptable for Israel. Everywhere else on earth must be "multicultural". That's one of the reasons they hate and constantly go after Putin because he guards Russia's sovereignty against the Zionist NWO.
 
No, what you did is called cherry picking.. What I did was take his statements as a whole, which don't even contradict each other and determine what the true meaning was. And I was right because he said he was saying exactly what I have been saying he was saying. You can take your cherry picked statements and make assumptions, but without broader context all you are doing is cherry picking.. you are playing right into the MSM's hands and helping Trump get elected, great job....

lol you need to get a grip on reality. I did not cherry pick. Trump said what he said and then he doubled and tripled down on it. It's not my fault that you and your ilk are using every possible tool at your disposal to reinforce your cognitive dissonance on this issue. The manner in which you guys are trying to twist words and argue semantics is honestly amusing at this point.

This entire thread is essentially one long argument that 1 + 1 equals 3. You can keep insisting that it equals 3 but the rest of us know the truth.

Believe what you want, I don't care. Trump's words are public record and people are free to draw their own conclusions.

FYI I don't actually believe Trump is a racist. I do believe that he says anything that comes to mind and talks out of his ass, and as such sometimes makes racist statements. This is certainly one of those instances. I do think he also knows that this plays well to his base, but the reality is that Trump is eventually going to have to get more votes than his 30% base of the Republican party if he ever wants to be elected.

Anyway, mission accomplished. The entire country is talking about this now instead of focusing on a clear cut case of fraud and wondering why someone (supposedly) worth $10 BN feels the need to conduct fraudulent business practices for a measly few million dollars.
 
Last edited:
After a call from Reince Priebus, historic FOPC and RNC puppet Trump appears to be walking it back:

 
Proof? Oh, yeah modern era requires one just toss words at another individual and demand the accused prove the non-existence to the satisfaction of the accuser who harbored an ax to grind. :rolleyes: October 2014, he never filed against the judge and still has no proof prior to his wall issue.

Perhaps it is that I don't cotton to your flavor of dictator in chief and until y'all decide to let me and mine out of that social contract (no, I don't owe you money for the privilege and I won't move to Somalia) that demands your decisions have any authority within my household, I'll keep on pointing out your wanna be emperor's short comings.

What do you mean "proof"? I asked you a question. I didn't make an accusation. Defensive much? YOU used the word "vitriol" in describing Trump making an issue of illegal immigration. It's logical that I would follow with asking if you are an open borders whatever. Are you in favor of open borers and, if so, why? Do you feel illegals living the US should be granted amnesty? I'm open about what I think and it's you responded with a defensive remark rather than reveal your beliefs.

It's been presented here several times; the judge is a member of La Raza (pro illegal alien & open borders) and another group that said they would target Trump's business interests. That's proof of of the judge's agenda and reason for suspicion about his ability to be unbiased.

The rest of your comment is downright nutty. I don't give a f#%k where you live and have no idea what you're talking about with paying anyone money. I also don't know what you're talking about regarding a social contract. Obviously, it all makes sense in the strange world inside your head but it's a mystery to me. I have no authority over your household nor do I want any, lol. More cray-cray from your internal world, I guess.

Then you go to say that Trump is my "flavor of dictator in chief" and my "wanna be emperor". Really? Where did I say that? I think is full of shit and an immature jerk on many levels. There are a couple of reasons I voted for him, anyway, in my primary and will in the general: I want to see US participation in globalization reversed; out of bad trade agreements; peace with Russia; control over immigration; no more wars of aggression; out of NATO; cancellation of any participation in the global warming scam. That's it. Will he issue executive orders if he's elected? Probably. ALL executive orders are diktats, AFAIC, so there's that. Will his be worse than all of the previous presidents whose agenda was the destruction of US sovereignty? Doubt it!
 
lol you need to get a grip on reality. I did not cherry pick. Trump said what he said and then he doubled and tripled down on it. It's not my fault that you and your ilk are using every possible tool at your disposal to reinforce your cognitive dissonance on this issue. The manner in which you guys are trying to twist words and argue semantics is honestly amusing at this point.

This entire thread is essentially one long argument that 1 + 1 equals 3. You can keep insisting that it equals 3 but the rest of us know the truth.

Believe what you want, I don't care. Trump's words are public record and people are free to draw their own conclusions.

FYI I don't actually believe Trump is a racist. I do believe that he says anything that comes to mind and talks out of his ass, and as such sometimes makes racist statements. This is certainly one of those instances. I do think he also knows that this plays well to his base, but the reality is that Trump is eventually going to have to get more votes than his 30% base of the Republican party if he ever wants to be elected.

Anyway, mission accomplished. The entire country is talking about this now instead of focusing on a clear cut case of fraud and wondering why someone (supposedly) worth $10 BN feels the need to conduct fraudulent business practices for a measly few million dollars.

I don't disagree with a couple of things you've said but when has Trump ever said anything "racist". Please be specific.

Trump U sounds like every other real estate/get rich course. Some people go on to be successful and most don't. I heard on CNN that while it was in existence that 2500 out of 10,000 asked for and received refunds without any problem. I have not read the case material (and don't want to waste my time on that). Have you read it? I'm curious about the fraud you're alleging. Can you elaborate and be specific? My impression (only since I've since I've not read the documents) is it was more pie-in-the-sky like similar courses and that those who didn't get much out of it, or flopped at real estate, are hoping to shake him down for money that he got out of them. Dunno.
 
What do you mean "proof"? I asked you a question. I didn't make an accusation. Defensive much? YOU used the word "vitriol" in describing Trump making an issue of illegal immigration. It's logical that I would follow with asking if you are an open borders whatever. Are you in favor of open borers and, if so, why? Do you feel illegals living the US should be granted amnesty? I'm open about what I think and it's you responded with a defensive remark rather than reveal your beliefs.

It's been presented here several times; the judge is a member of La Raza (pro illegal alien & open borders) and another group that said they would target Trump's business interests. That's proof of of the judge's agenda and reason for suspicion about his ability to be unbiased.

The rest of your comment is downright nutty. I don't give a f#%k where you live and have no idea what you're talking about with paying anyone money. I also don't know what you're talking about regarding a social contract. Obviously, it all makes sense in the strange world inside your head but it's a mystery to me. I have no authority over your household nor do I want any, lol. More cray-cray from your internal world, I guess.

Then you go to say that Trump is my "flavor of dictator in chief" and my "wanna be emperor". Really? Where did I say that? I think is full of shit and an immature jerk on many levels. There are a couple of reasons I voted for him, anyway, in my primary and will in the general: I want to see US participation in globalization reversed; out of bad trade agreements; peace with Russia; control over immigration; no more wars of aggression; out of NATO; cancellation of any participation in the global warming scam. That's it. Will he issue executive orders if he's elected? Probably. ALL executive orders are diktats, AFAIC, so there's that. Will his be worse than all of the previous presidents whose agenda was the destruction of US sovereignty? Doubt it!

If those are your reasons for voting for him, you are going to be sorely disappointed if he somehow gets elected.
 
If those are your reasons for voting for him, you are going to be sorely disappointed if he somehow gets elected.

It's a lot. Do you think he's BSing about some or all of it? Do you think he's telling the truth about any of what he's said he'd like to do?
 
It's a lot. Do you think he's BSing about some or all of it? Do you think he's telling the truth about any of what he's said he'd like to do?

Wait until you see who his running mate will be. That person will be the real president.
 
To qualify for a refund, you had to request it within three days of signing up (not from the first day of the classes). If you signed up on Monday and course started on Friday and you decided after that first one it sucked, you could not get your money back. http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/...p-university-lawsuits-legal-battles/85238384/ A lot of people who requested refunds were told it was too late to get one.

10,000 out of 7,000 who took the classes gave 98% positive reviews. (yes, that is more than 100% of them).
 
Wait until you see who his running mate will be. That person will be the real president.


You didn't answer my question, though. Do you think he's sincere about the issue that I listed?

I'd have to say he's in danger if the Republican establishment picks a VP. They'll shoot him and put in the VP. Pretty much what they tried to do with Bush 41 when he was VP. I think Hinkley was a mind controlled assassin. Anyway, it looks like no establishment politician wants to run with Trump so it will be interesting to see what unfolds.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top