Jake Tapper nails Trump on "Mexican" judge comments in utterly mad interview

Status
Not open for further replies.
It is a professional association- like a Black Doctors Association or say Jewish Dentists group. It is not the same as the La Raza activist group. They are not affiliated at all.

http://www.redstate.com/leon_h_wolf/2016/06/03/dishonest-attempt-associate-gonzalo-curiel-la-raza/

You link to "NeverTrump" (and Ron Paul haters, btw) Red State? Get real.

You must have just fallen off the turnip truck to fall for this La Raza is not La Raze BS. IT'S LA RAZA. That's why they have the same name. This obfuscation is called LYING. Sinn Fein always said they were not the IRA, too, but they were/are. They were just the political branch while the others guys made the bombs.
 
C0UHdWr.png
 
It is a professional association- like a Black Doctors Association or say Jewish Dentists group. It is not the same as the La Raza activist group. They are not affiliated at all.

http://www.redstate.com/leon_h_wolf/2016/06/03/dishonest-attempt-associate-gonzalo-curiel-la-raza/

Actually, it is like the Ku Klux Klan Lawyers Association or the Nation of Islam Lawyers Association. They didn't get their name by accident. Whether directly affiliated or not, this group chose to name themselves after a Mestizo Supremacist Organization that is not just virulently racist, but treasonous as well (they call for reconquering the American Southwest and returning it to Mexico).

Matt Hale was denied the right to practice law just because he belonged to a white supremacist organization. This asshole was not only allowed to practice, he was appointed a judge! Trump is doing the nation a service by exposing him and the corrupt nature of the American judicial system.
 
Who can judge Donald Trump?

Have we considered the possibility that the entire Trump campaign is just an attempt to offend as many categories of people as possible so that every judge on the Trump University case will have to recuse himself?

..It’s a pretty nifty strategy, when you think about it. If the principle is that you must recuse yourself if you belong to a group about which Trump has said offensive things, the judicial pickings are going to be extremely slim.

At the rate we are going, soon the only person who has yet to be offended by Donald Trump is, er, Donald Trump.

Maybe that’s the judge Trump wants.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/compost/wp/2016/06/06/who-can-judge-donald-trump/
 
http://www.wnd.com/2016/06/trump-u-judges-group-tied-to-national-council-of-laraza/

NEW YORK – The federal judge presiding over the Trump University class action lawsuit is a member of the San Diego La Raza Lawyers Association, a group that while not a branch of the National Council of La Raza, has ties to the controversial organization, which translates literally “The Race.”

U.S. District Judge Gonzalo Curiel, who has been criticized by Donald Trump as a “hater” appointed by President Obama who should be recused from the case, listed his membership in the “La Raza Lawyers of San Diego” on a judicial questionnaire he filled out when he was selected to be a federal judge. He was named in a brochure as a member of the selection committee for the organization’s 2014 Annual Scholarship Fund Dinner & Gala. Meanwhile, the San-Diego based law firm representing the plaintiffs in the Trump University case, Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd, was listed as a sponsor of the event.

Judge Gonzalo Curiel

WND reported the San Diego firm paid $675,000 to the Clintons for speeches, and the firm’s founder is a wealthy San Diego lawyer who served a two-year sentence in federal prison for his role in a kickback scheme to mobilize plaintiffs for class-action lawsuits.

Get a first-hand account of the Democratic Party presidential front-runner’s character in “Hillary The Other Woman.” Then take action with the Hillary Clinton Investigative Justice Project and let others know, with a bumper sticker calling for “Hillary for prosecution, not president.”

While critics of Trump have argued that the San Diego La Raza Lawyers’ association is not affiliated with the National Council of La Raza, consider the following:

* The San Diego La Raza Lawyers Association is a member of the La Raza Lawyers of California, affiliated with the Chicano/Latino Bar Association of California.
* On the website of the La Raza Lawyers Association of California, at the bottom of the “Links & Affiliates Page,” the National Council of La Raza is listed.
* The website of the San Diego La Raza Lawyers Association is joint-listed as San Diego’s Latino/Latina Bar Association.
* On the “endorsements” page, the combined website lists the National Council of La Raza as part of the “community,” along with the Hispanic National Bar Association,, a group that emerged with a changed name from the originally formed La Raza National Lawyers Association and the La Raza National Bar Association tracing its origin back to 1971.

Further, while the San Diego La Raza Lawyers Association and the National Council of La Raza are legally separate incorporated entities, the two groups appear to have an affiliation that traces back to the emergence of MEChA, the Moviemento Estudiantil Chicanos de Atzlán.

MEChA is a 1960s radical separatist student movement in California that espoused the mythical Aztec idea of a “nation of Aztlán,” comprising much of the southwestern United States, including California.

As David Horowitz points out on his website Discover the Networks that La Raza, Spanish for “the race,” also has roots in the early 1960s with a “united front” organization, the National Organization for Mexican American Services, NOMAS. The group initially was funded by the Ford Foundation, and subsequently by George Soros’ Open Society Institute and the John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation.

In 1968, the Southwest Council of La Raza was organized with Ford Foundation funding. In 1972, the group changed its name to the National Council of La Raza and opened an office in Washington, D.C.
At the 2014 San Diego La Raza Lawyers Association event at which Curiel served as a panel member, one of the recipients of a $1,500 scholarship, Ricardo Elorza, boast about being an illegal immigrant.

“Mr. Elorza wishes to someday tell any student struggling with higher education, ‘Look, a boy from Oaxaca, who did not know English, and is undocumented has now graduated from law school and is an attorney,” the San Diego La Raza Lawyers’ Association brochure for the 2014 Annual Scholarship Fund Dinner & Gala said.

The “Pro Bono & Community Service” page on the Robbins Geller website lists the La Raza Scholarship Fund as one of the causes the firm’s attorney and staff have supported for more than a decade.

In 2014, the San Diego La Raza Lawyers Scholarship Fund named past president and then-current endorsement committee chair George Aguilar, a Robbins Geller attorney, as the groups 2014 Attorney of the Year.

On May 26, the San Diego La Raza Lawyers Association held a reception for Curiel, honoring him “for his leadership and support to the community and to our association.”

Hillary Clinton’s ties to La Raza

In 2007, Hillary Clinton named Raul Yzaguirre, the former president of the National Council of La Raza, to co-chair her presidential campaign and to lead its outreach to Hispanic voters.

In the announcement, the Clinton campaign noted that under Yzaguirre’s leadership, the National Council of La Raza became the largest Hispanic advocacy organization in the nation, with 41 state affiliates and revenues exceeding $3 million, including corporate contributions, philanthropic foundation grants, federal taxpayer support and private member donations.

Yzaguirre was a member of the 2007 Council on Foreign Relations task force that published a report titled “Building a North American Community,” which some critics regard as the blueprint for the creation of a regional North American Union modeled after the European Union.

Clinton addressed the National Council of La Raza annual conference in Kansas City, Missouri, in July 2015.

In the speech, Hillary attacked Trump, characterizing him as engaging in hate speech toward Latinos.

“It was appalling to hear Donald Trump describe immigrants as drug dealers, rapists, and criminals,” Clinton said. “He’s talking about people you and I know, isn’t he? He’s talking about people who love this country, work hard, and want nothing more than a chance to build a better life for themselves and their children.”

She then attacked Trump for not apologizing to Hispanics.

“And when people and businesses everywhere rejected his hateful comments, did he apologize? No. He doubled down,” Clinton continued. “It’s shameful. And no one should stand for it.

“So I have just one word for Mr. Trump: BASTA! Enough!” she concluded, receiving an enthusiastic response from her audience.

La Raza named in anti-Trump violent protests

While the National Council on La Raza has made clear the organization does not endorse anti-Trump protesters engaging in violent acts, demonstrators in California were marked by the presence of Mexican flags, which resonates with the separatist ideology of radical La Raza Hispanic activists in California since the 1960s.

Commentators such as talk-host Tammy Bruce and former Republican Rep. Allen West have identified anti-Trump protesters in California as La Raza activists.

On May 27, an estimated 1,000 anti-Trump protesters waved Mexican flags and burned Trump “Make America Great Again” baseball caps outside the San Diego Convention Center while chanting slogans protesting Trump’s candidacy and his vow to build a wall to control illegal immigration.

On June 3, Rick Manning, president of Americans for Limited Government, wrote in an April 3 column for Breitbart that the recent increase in violent Hispanic demonstrations suggests the influence of La Raza activists, with the group’s history of identifying with the Mexican Reconquista movement.

“The Mexican Reconquista movement is a rejection of American sovereignty over lands that, according to mythology, were formerly held by the Aztecs throughout the southwestern United States,” Manning noted. “And it is telling that many of the anti-Trump protesters reject his notion to ‘make America great again’ instead waving Mexican flags while burning the Stars and Stripes.”
 
La Raza Judge Gonzalo Curiel and the Hispanic National Bar Association…
Posted on June 7, 2016 by sundance

The curriculum vitae of Trump University Judge Gonzalo Curiel specifically mentions his affiliation with the Hispanic National Bar Association, or HNBA.

curiel 2

The Hispanic National Bar Association published a press release on July 2nd 2015 which specifically stated their intention to target the “business interests” of Donald Trump:

judge gonzalo curiel 2

curiel 3

Full July 2nd Press Release available HERE

Now, I doubt you could find a more conformational reason for Donald Trump to be concerned about a Judge overseeing the Trump University lawsuit, which everyone admits is based on some sketchy legal standing, than Judge Curiel specifically belonging to a legal enterprise of affiliates who have clearly stated their intent to target Trump’s business interests.

Recap:

The attorney group leading the lawsuit against Trump are heavily involved in Democrat politics and have paid Bill and Hillary Clinton $675,000 for “speeches”. (link)
The Judge in the lawsuit is an open borders immigration activist with direct ties to San Diego La Raza, and has openly engaged with them on their political endeavors. (link) and (link) including scholarships for illegal aliens.
The Trump lawsuit relies (in part) on testimony from a former disgruntled employee of the Trump Organization who went to work for notorious #NeverTrump activist Glenn Beck. (link)
The Judge then “accidentally” releases court records which provides the media with the names, locations, and contact information of the plaintiffs and witnesses in the case, which fuels the media narrative. (link)
After the “mistaken” release, Judge Curiel reseals the court records. (link)
The Judge is a member of an ethnic legal group, HNBA, whose specific and publicly expressed intentions are to target Donald Trump’s business interests (link)

https://theconservativetreehouse.co...ispanic-national-bar-association/#more-117158
 
You link to "NeverTrump" (and Ron Paul haters, btw) Red State? Get real.

You must have just fallen off the turnip truck to fall for this La Raza is not La Raze BS. IT'S LA RAZA. That's why they have the same name. This obfuscation is called LYING. Sinn Fein always said they were not the IRA, too, but they were/are. They were just the political branch while the others guys made the bombs.

Hate much?
 
Already addressed, try to keep up emotional children.

Read the links I posted I'm not saying they are related in their particular causes. But we know that is probably not a stretch. But he is associated with a group called "the race" "the race" "the race" " the race" "the race" "the race" "the race". Capeesh?

You sound just like Trump. The doublespeak is strong.

You say Curiel is a member of La Raza. Despite your implications, you then say that you aren't talking about that La Raza. Then you immediately say they probably are related.

If you think these groups are related in anything other than their name, please provide proof. Otherwise, stop propagating baseless lies.
 
You sound just like Trump. The doublespeak is strong.

You say Curiel is a member of La Raza. Despite your implications, you then say that you aren't talking about that La Raza. Then you immediately say they probably are related.

If you think these groups are related in anything other than their name, please provide proof. Otherwise, stop propagating baseless lies.

But....but.....the MSM says so, so it must be TRUES! (The same MSM, BTW, that Trumpies say not to listen to because it hates their beloved candidate.) :)
 
You link to "NeverTrump" (and Ron Paul haters, btw) Red State? Get real.

You must have just fallen off the turnip truck to fall for this La Raza is not La Raze BS. IT'S LA RAZA. That's why they have the same name. This obfuscation is called LYING. Sinn Fein always said they were not the IRA, too, but they were/are. They were just the political branch while the others guys made the bombs.

Reading is your friend.

AGAIN:

After graduating from Indiana University’s law school, Judge Curiel worked in private practice in Indiana and California. In 1989, he became an assistant United States attorney in the Southern District of California, a job that immersed him in the war on drugs.

Judge Curiel was a hard-charging prosecutor at a time when the American authorities were trying to help Mexico confront the Arellano Félix brothers, the heads of a murderous cartel that controlled a torrent of narcotics coming into the Western United States. In a period when Mexico was reluctant to send its drug lords for trial in the United States, Mr. Curiel’s job involved working with informants and sometimes-corrupt Mexican officials to win convictions in this country and in Mexico.

In one 1990s case, when he was pushing to extradite two men accused of being Arellano gunmen to Mexico, he found himself defending witness testimony against the men that had most likely been obtained through torture by the Mexican police.

“The government is not here to deny there is a possibility of torture,” Mr. Curiel told a federal judge. “But the forum for those allegations to be aired is the government of Mexico.”

The Arellano-Félix cartel kept Mr. Curiel in its sights. One of the suspected gunmen, according to court filings, was recorded in prison saying he “had requested and received permission from the leaders of the Arellano cartel to have Curiel murdered,” forcing Mr. Curiel to live for a while under guard.

He and Mr. Vega, whose father also was Mexican, met regularly with their counterparts across the border. Mr. Vega said their ability to speak Spanish and their Mexican roots were helpful, ultimately leading to the first extradition of a suspected Mexican drug kingpin to the United States in 2001.
 
http://spectator.org/trump-is-right-the-shame-of-paul-ryan-and-mitch-mcconnell/
Trump Is Right: The Shame of Paul Ryan and Mitch McConnell
Jeffrey Lord



The GOP Establishment is in full flight.


No Abraham Lincolns here.


In a shameful haste to embrace identity politics, the latter the political descendant of slavery and segregation, Speaker Paul Ryan and Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell have stunningly given thumbs up to a judge who has made no bones about injecting his ethnic heritage into his role as a lawyer and judge.


In a broadside against Judge Gonzalo Curiel, who presiding over the case against Trump University (a case in itself riddled with bad judicial decision-making as the judge has assigned the case to a notoriously Clinton-supporting law firm — more of which later this week), Trump has assailed the Indiana-born judge as “of Mexican heritage” who has “an inherent conflict of interest.”


The response from the Speaker? “It’s reasoning I don’t relate to. I completely disagree with the thinking behind that.” Said McConnell: “I think it’s a big mistake for our party to write off Latino Americans.” Hello? Speaker Ryan can’t relate to standing up to fight racism? Who, Senator McConnell, is writing off Latino Americans? And isn’t it time to get right with Lincoln and write off racism — aka in the 21st century, “identity politics”? Appallingly in the case of Ryan, his latest comments embracing out and out race-driven lawyering and judging comes only weeks after he said he stood for the “Party of Lincoln, Reagan, and Kemp.” Well that didn’t last long. Somewhere Abe, Ronnie, and Jack are baffled as to why their defender has suddenly thrown them over the side to embrace the absolute worst of racial politics.


Over in the Wall Street Journal, our friends on the editorial board have written an entire editorial on the subject entitled:
Trump and the ‘Mexican’ Judge


Why equating ethnicity with judicial bias is so offensive.


Well, yes, “equating ethnicity with judicial bias” is offensive. Yet the WSJ has not a solitary word revealing to readers that Judge Curiel has been actively associated with the racially-centric San Diego La Raza Lawyers Association — a group entirely devoted to “equating ethnicity with judicial bias.” An association Curiel listed on his questionnaire filed with the Senate Judiciary Committee. The group, as I noted over at NewsBusters, specifically states its mission on its website as follows:
Our purpose is to advance the cause of equality, empowerment and justice for Latino attorneys and the Latino community in San Diego County through service and advocacy.


Note. The group supports “equality, empowerment and justice” not for all attorneys in San Diego — only for “Latino attorneys.”


Listing eight “goals” of the group, every one of which are ethnocentric, the first three reading:
  • Increase the overall number of Latinos in the legal profession.
  • Encourage and support Latino and Latina judicial candidates to apply to the bench.
  • Advocate for the promotion and retention of Latino and Latina attorneys and judicial officers.


Note well goal number two — “Encourage and support Latino and Latina judicial candidates to apply to the bench.” In other words? The group wants to put not qualified attorneys of any color or gender on the bench. No, the insistence is a racially-oriented drive to put only one group — a group pre-selected by ethnic heritage on the bench. (Can you imagine the uproar if the late Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia had belonged to a “white attorneys association”? Answer: Yes, you can.) Why might this be? The answer is obvious.


In a day and age when the working assumption by the Left is that all minorities, Latinos in this case, are liberal, the way to liberal decisions is by backing openly race-centric judges of Latino heritage. To get decisions from the bench that are geared to supporting Latinos — not all Americans — but Latinos only.


This idea, by the way, is certainly not limited to Latinos. Recall the demand that retiring Supreme Court Justice Thurgood Marshall be replaced by a black nominee. President George H.W. Bush obliged with Judge Clarence Thomas. Thomas was quickly attacked by liberals the moment they realized he was a conservative. He is to this day attacked for being an “Uncle Tom” and a “traitor” to his race because the working assumption is that if you are black you are a liberal. And so it is with Latinos — and in this case Judge Curiel.


Most assuredly, Judge Gonzalo Curiel has gone out of his way to not only openly tie himself to this group of racially directed lawyers — but to participate in the left-wing agenda favored so deeply by leftist race-driven Hispanics. In 2014 the Judge served as a member of the group’s 2014 Scholarship Selection Committee, which in turn awarded a $1,500 scholarship to a self-advertised “undocumented.” Think of that for a moment. The very first act of this student was to break American law, and Judge Curiel awards him a scholarship — for law school!


In a blink Ryan and McConnell have shown exactly why Donald Trump has blown away the Republican Establishment in the GOP primary season. The GOP Establishment has lay down with the flea-infected mangy old political dog of racism — a left wing dependable from the days when Democratic Party co-founders Jefferson and Jackson allied the new-born party with slave owners. Later to turn into a permanent racial party appealing to every race-centered group from segregationists to Al Sharpton and today’s Black Lives Matter, not to mention various “La Raza” oriented groups of varying pedigree. As the GOP Establishment takes it cues from the Left — hence the charge that GOP Establishment types are “Democrat-lite” or RINOS on issues ranging from the economy to social issues — so now are they mimicking the Left on race, signing on for the out-and-out racism of “identity politics.”


Take a look here to see just how this game of race and gender is played by leftist California judges — and Judge Curiel. (Hat tip: Attorney Mark Pulliam, who formerly practiced in San Diego and now calls Texas home.)


Recall that on his Senate Judiciary Committee form, Curiel said that he was a member of the “California Judges Association.” And back there a mere year ago in January of 2015, the California Judges Association was enthusiastically supportive of a decision from the California Supreme Court that ruled, as reported by Fox News, this:
California’s Supreme Court voted Friday to prohibit state judges from belonging to the Boy Scouts on grounds that the group discriminates against gays.


The court said its seven justices unanimously voted to heed a recommendation by its ethics advisory committee barring judges’ affiliation with the organization.


Got that? It’s OK for Judge Curiel and a small army of California judges and lawyers to belong to the San Diego La Raza Lawyers Association — a group openly discriminating against non-Latinos — but it’s not OK for a California judge to belong to the Boy Scouts — the Boy Scouts! — because “the group discriminates against gays.”


It doesn’t get more racist than that.


Let’s be blunt. There’s no room for identity politics in the party of Lincoln. The fact that Paul Ryan (Paul Ryan!) and Mitch McConnell would stand up and defend outright race-driven politics is utterly disgraceful.


Here, to refresh, is Abraham Lincoln himself on the subject of race. Lincoln, as noted in Doris Kearns Goodwin’s Team of Rivals, said he hoped to “‘penetrate the human soul’ until…‘all this quibbling about this man and the other man — this race and that race and the other race being inferior’” was gone from America. In more recent times, there is President John F. Kennedy telling the nation in his televised address over the racial turmoil in 1963 Birmingham, Alabama that “race has no place in American life or law.” And so it doesn’t.


Now today’s GOP Establishment, led by Speaker Ryan and Senator McConnell, are saying that Donald Trump, a defendant in the rigged trial that is the witch hunt for Trump University, must be quiet about this insistent racialization of the federal bench and the law itself. Trump is being told that now that he is the soon-to-be heir to the leadership of Lincoln’s party he must sign on to the idea that it’s perfectly OK to insist that race has a decided priority in both American life and law and that he, Donald Trump, as a defendant has no right to call attention to something that left-wing racial advocates boast of freely. Recall that when it came to light that then Supreme Court Obama-nominee Sonia Sotomayor was found to be saying in speeches that a “wise Latina woman with the richness of her experiences would more often than not reach a better conclusion than a white male,” leftist were thrilled.


Now? Donald Trump is calling out this flat-out racism by targeting a judge for what might be called the judge’s “wise Latino” ways? Suddenly the GOP Establishment is attacking —Trump?


This is shameful. But totally in character for the GOP Leadership in Congress that long ago abandoned principle for political correctness.


Speaker Ryan and Senator McConnell should be embarrassed.
 
Kristol and his friends are calling people racist again





https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2016/06/06/7ed101b2-2c15-11e6-9b37-42985f6a265c_story.html

Republicans finally discover that Trump is an actual racist



Donald Trump needed validation.

At a rally Friday, Trump was discussing racial violence at his events and the perception that nonwhite people are against him, when he singled out a black man in the crowd.

“Look at my African American over here,” Trump said, pointing. “Look at him. Are you the greatest?”

The gesture — reminiscent of Trump eating a Cinco de Mayo taco bowl at Trump Tower and tweeting “I love Hispanics!” — was as respectful as if he had just instructed the crowd to “look at my Irish setter over here.” And it was as clumsy as if he had tried to validate his pro-Israel position by saying, “Look at my Jew over here,” or to neutralize his general intolerance by saying, “Say hello to my lesbian,” or, “Take a gander at my Chinese American.”

It turns out Trump’s African American, Gregory Cheadle, says he’s not a Trump supporter. He said he wasn’t offended by Trump taking possession of him, telling NPR it would have been worse if Trump followed “my African American” by saying, “What’s up, dawg?” or the N-word.
Republicans react to Trump's comments on judge
Play Video1:54
Republican lawmakers past and present reacted to Donald Trump's comments about Judge Gonzalo Curiel over the weekend, carefully distancing themselves from Trump's position. (Peter Stevenson/The Washington Post)

Small consolation.

A confluence of three factors has caused a sudden and sharp change in Trump’s fortunes. The media scrutiny has increased significantly since he secured the nomination, and journalists, rather than chasing his outrage du jour, are digging in to report more on Trump University, Trump’s stiffing of charities, his lies and his racism. Hillary Clinton has, finally, made the shift to attacking Trump vigorously over his instability. And Republicans are, belatedly, discovering that their presidential candidate wasn’t putting on a show during the GOP primaries: He’s an actual racist.

You know you’re in trouble when you’re being lectured on sensitivity by Newt Gingrich. The former House speaker, a frequent Trump defender, emailed The Post’s Dan Balz to say that Trump’s claim that a federal judge had a conflict of interest because the Indiana-born jurist is “Mexican” was “completely unacceptable.” (He softened his criticism of Trump on Monday.)

Sen. Susan Collins (R-Maine) concurred that Trump’s attack on the judge and his claim that a Muslim on the bench also couldn’t judge him fairly was “absolutely unacceptable.” After an initial effort to rally around the nominee, Republicans are trying, awkwardly, to keep their distance. Sunday on ABC’s “This Week,” Bob Corker (R-Tenn), chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, complained to George Stephanopoulos when asked a question about the border wall with Mexico: “I thought this interview was going to be more about the foreign-policy arena.” The host reminded Corker that the relationship with Mexico is foreign policy.

House Speaker Paul Ryan, just one day after endorsing Trump, said on a radio show that Trump’s remarks about the Hispanic judge were “out of left field.”

Sorry, Mr. Speaker, but that’s nonsense. The things Trump is doing now — disparaging the “Mexican” judge, disqualifying Muslim judges, calling somebody claiming Native American blood “Pocahontas” and singling out “my African American” — is very much in line with what he has been doing for the past year, and before.

More than six months ago, I began a column by proposing, “Let’s not mince words: Donald Trump is a bigot and a racist.” His bigotry went back decades, to the Central Park jogger case, and came to include: his leadership of the “birther” movement suggesting President Obama was a foreign-born Muslim, his vulgar expressions for women, his talk of Mexico sending rapists into America, his call for mass deportation, his spats with Latino news outlets, his mocking Asian accent, his tacit acceptance of the claim that Muslims are a “problem” in America, his agreement that American Muslims should be forced to register themselves, his call to ban Muslim immigration, his false claim about American Muslims celebrating 9/11, his tweeting of statistics from white supremacists, his condoning of violence against black demonstrators and his mocking of a journalist with a physical disability.

Now that Trump has secured the nomination, Republican officeholders are shocked to discover that his racism continues?

A month ago, the Trump campaign chose prominent white nationalist William Johnson to be one of its delegates. The campaign blamed a “database error” and Johnson resigned, but the racist American Freedom Party claims it has “more delegates” on Trump’s list. Another Trump delegate was indicted recently on federal child-pornography and weapons charges, and Mother Jones magazine, which discovered Johnson’s selection, on Friday reported that another Trump delegate, David Riden, has said that U.S. leaders who abuse the Constitution should be “killed by American citizens with weapons.” And the Chicago Tribune reported that Illinois Trump delegate Lori Gayne uses the social-media handle “whitepride” and said: “I’m so angry I don’t even feel like I live in America. You can call me a racist.”

Republicans, look at your nominee over here. It’s a grotesque sight.
 
Trump has assailed the Indiana-born judge as “of Mexican heritage” who has “an inherent conflict of interest.”

http://spectator.org/trump-is-right-the-shame-of-paul-ryan-and-mitch-mcconnell/

Well, as that appears to be a quote from Trump, that makes him accurate on the first count (which is objective fact), and terribly wrong on the second. It is not "an inherent conflict of interest". Potential maybe, given the circumstances, but not inherent. Trump is being collectivist.
 
Well, as that appears to be a quote from Trump, that makes him accurate on the first count (which is objective fact), and terribly wrong on the second. It is not "an inherent conflict of interest". Potential maybe, given the circumstances, but not inherent. Trump is being collectivist.

If only we "collectivist" were as severe of a slur as "racist"! :)
 
Maybe you should read the article.

What point are you attempting to make with the article? He's an 'hispanic' who is in La Raza, an organization that advocates for, among other things, illegal aliens. His background as a prosecutor doesn't mean anything. Being born in Indiana doesn't mean squat, either. Lots of people born in the US work tirelessly to undermine the country and have loyalties that lie elsewhere.

I think Trump is an appalling moron in many of the ways he communicates, but he is not wrong to say that a member of La Raza is biased and would be especially so against someone who has taken Trump's stand against illegal immigration.

This nonsense about not criticizing judges - as though they are gods - is ridiculous.
 
What point are you attempting to make with the article? He's an 'hispanic' who is in La Raza, an organization that advocates for, among other things, illegal aliens. His background as a prosecutor doesn't mean anything. Being born in Indiana doesn't mean squat, either. Lots of people born in the US work tirelessly to undermine the country and have loyalties that lie elsewhere.

I think Trump is an appalling moron in many of the ways he communicates, but he is not wrong to say that a member of La Raza is biased and would be especially so against someone who has taken Trump's stand against illegal immigration.

This nonsense about not criticizing judges - as though they are gods - is ridiculous.

So- you didn't read how he helped take out some Mexican drug cartels in the US and that they were going to assassinate him? You were complaining earlier about this judge and using Mexicans and drugs etc.

I don't think judges are gods-and interesting how Trump now brings this up over this law suit that was going on long before his candidacy. He is now using the whole "Baaaaaad Mexicans and here's my proof!" to a) get the public on his side for these lawsuits and b) get more Mexican haters on board.

Never mind that Trump has paid off a lot of elected people to stop investigations.
 
Ceaser Chavez: "la raza is an anti-gringo thing"

Isn't Ceaser Chavez a hero to Mexican-Americans and socialists?

In an old interview, he stated that when someone says "la raza" it's racist and "anti-gringo". He wasn't talking about a specific organization. He was referring to the concept behind the term. Wouldn't he know?

Excerpts from a 1969 story in The New Yorker entitled Profile: Cesar Chavez (by Peter Matthiessen):

“I hear more and more Mexicans talking about la raza - to build up their pride, you know,” Chavez told me. “Some people don’t look at it as racism, but when you say 'la raza,’ you are saying an anti-gringo thing, and it won’t stop there…"

…”We had a stupid guy who just wanted to play politics with the union, and he began to whip up la raza against the white volunteers…”

…”La raza is a very dangerous concept. I speak very strongly against it among the chicanos. At this point in the struggle, they respect me enough so that they don’t emphasize la raza, but as soon as this is over they’ll be against me, because I make fun of it, and I knock down machismo, too…”

https://libraries.ucsd.edu/farmwork...ys/MillerArchive/032 Profile Cesar Chavez.pdf
Chavez died in 1993.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top