Truth Warrior
Banned
- Joined
- Dec 3, 2007
- Messages
- 18,789
Well that's certainly better than I picture you.I swear sometimes I picture you as a mentally handicapped person with a helmet on viciously hunt and pecking the next reply.

Well that's certainly better than I picture you.I swear sometimes I picture you as a mentally handicapped person with a helmet on viciously hunt and pecking the next reply.
Well that's certainly better than I picture you.![]()
You missed!I was going for self irony.![]()
Probably because you aren't accounting for tremendous periods of time (billions) with stupdendous ammounts of mutations.
You know, thinking logically. Heck, give that E.coli 1 thousand years and see where it's at, then give it a few millions, then the big one, billions.
It really is quite simple.
Pete
Faith. You have as much of it as I do.![]()
Faith. You have as much of it as I do.![]()
It's not faith, you cretin.
Pete
Where was E. Coli a thousand years ago, a million, a billion?Probably because you aren't accounting for tremendous periods of time (billions) with stupdendous ammounts of mutations.
You know, thinking logically. Heck, give that E.coli 1 thousand years and see where it's at, then give it a few millions, then the big one, billions.
It really is quite simple.
Pete
Oh, so you observed those thousands, millions, and billions of years it took for bacteria to evolve into the species of E. coli, I see. Okay, God...![]()
Where was E. Coli a thousand years ago, a million, a billion?
Why call it "evolve"? Maybe it just burped!I don't care about the rest of this crap. That's a really cool study. Fascinating that the groundwork was set for the bacteria to evolve in generation 20k, but didn't express itself until generation ~31k.
It could give us a lot of new information on how evolution works, which is indeed, really freakin' cool.
No, I did not. I did not need to.
"Faith is a belief in the trustworthiness of an idea that one has not proven formally or cannot prove formally"
Evolution is far from believing in stories in an old book. It is fact and any sane person can conclude it if they haven't been touched by religion in early childhood.
Unfortunately you were molested pretty harshly by your parents beliefs and had little chance.
Now all you can do is cling emotionally to your book by exercising your intelect in a desperate attempt to save yourself from the mental breakdown that would more than likely ensue if you were to discover the reality of your faith and just how much damage your parents did.
Pete
I don't care about the rest of this crap. That's a really cool study. Fascinating that the groundwork was set for the bacteria to evolve in generation 20k, but didn't express itself until generation ~31k.
It could give us a lot of new information on how evolution works, which is indeed, really freakin' cool.
Darwin's, "Origins of Species", is a pretty old book!![]()
Great post, Theo.That's your definition of faith, not mine. Faith is based on evidence of things not seen. Though I can't see God, I know He exists because of the evidence found in nature and His revelation. You have faith in something you have not seen, either. You did not witness the evolution of E. coli through its supposed evolutionary history, which, according to you, took billions of years. You believe it happened for billions of years, but how do you know for sure?
NOTE: This discussion is not science vs. religion; it's religion vs. religion. You have a naturalistic view of the world, and I have a supernaturalistic one. Keep that in mind when you post your evidences and arguments. My parents taught me to think, not in spite of my Christian beliefs, but because of them. You, on the other hand, are the victim of humanistic dogma which tries to seclude itself from being a religious worldview, and that's the damnable deceit which fumes from the Darwinian superstition.
Obviously the evolutionists DON'T?Who knows? Who cares?
If you cannot see what this demonstrates about 'life' in the short time the experiment has been going, you are insane.
Pete
That's your definition of faith, not mine. Faith is based on evidence of things not seen. Though I can't see God, I know He exists because of the evidence found in nature and His revelation. You have faith in something you have not seen, either. You did not witness the evolution of E. coli through its supposed evolutionary history, which, according to you, took billions of years. You believe it happened for billions of years, but how do you know for sure?
NOTE: This discussion is not science vs. religion; it's religion vs. religion. You have a naturalistic view of the world, and I have a supernaturalistic one. Keep that in mind when you post your evidences and arguments. My parents taught me to think, not in spite of my Christian beliefs, but because of them. You, on the other hand, are the victim of humanistic dogma which tries to seclude itself from being a religious worldview, and that's the damnable deceit which fumes from the Darwinian superstition.
Duh moment for me too, it's just the same old shit. No new species!it was kind of a well duh moment for me.
I guess for real scientists, verifiable data is the most important thing, but I always kind of figured that was how it would work.