James_Madison_Lives
Member
- Joined
- Apr 11, 2010
- Messages
- 2,957
And it's the Maoist Democrats calling for the arrest of Trump for fomenting a "coup." You could hate the man and still see he won.
It's bulletproof, Trump won GA. Vote switching captured in JSON files, hearing testimony
- Thread starter James_Madison_Lives
- Start date
NorthCarolinaLiberty
Member
- Joined
- Oct 11, 2010
- Messages
- 12,674
And of course you're happy since you voted for Biden, Hillary, and Obama 2x. At this point, it's not even about Trump. You and your commie ilk hate Ron Paul supporters just as much as Trump supporters. You love to skewer us with the same enthusiasm.
Kotin
Moderator
- Joined
- Nov 29, 2007
- Messages
- 11,827
Because if you recount the same fraudulent ballots, of course it will not be any different
They need to do signature verification with these ballots which is what they refuse to do in the areas where it is rampant.. they agreed to do it in Cobb county, a county that nobody asked for this in but they refuse to do it in Fulton county..
It will show probably over 100,000 fraudulent ballots based on completely incorrect signatures that were forgeries and that is a conservative estimate from what I gather..
TheCount
Member
- Joined
- Mar 15, 2014
- Messages
- 11,740
That's not what's being alleged in the video.
CaptUSA
Member
- Joined
- May 17, 2011
- Messages
- 18,922
What is the explanation for the data anomalies? That is what is being questioned. Data analysis can show indicators where problems exist. And without question, there are some serious data issues. There should be a detailed audit (not a recount) to determine what happened. And your side is adamantly opposed to a detailed audit. Why? Wouldn't you want to provide the explanation to restore confidence in the process?
I don't really have a stake in the outcome, but instead of trying to bury this, don't you think there is certainly enough to warrant a detailed audit? These types of data anomalies are used all the time in finance to audit the inner workings of companies. Something seems fishy in the data, dig until you find the explanation. That's what we do.
Ok, if the hand recount didn't provide an explanation, then you have to do the detailed audit. It seems even you still have questions. You'd have to look at things like the signatures of absentees, the timestamps of ballot prints and printouts from the ballot scanners (which is what was hand recounted), isolation of decrements, data forensics, etc. This is all stuff that, prior to the election, people were saying would be necessary since the election process this year was so abnormal. And you know as well as I do, that if the outcome was flipped, the media and your side would be pushing for that audit.
Invisible Man
Member
- Joined
- Dec 9, 2019
- Messages
- 4,363
I am all for doing that. But all that will show is whether or not votes from ballots with bad signatures were counted. It won't show who those votes were cast for. This might result in being able to prosecute some of the people who did it. And it's quite possible that some people who forged signatures and mailed in ballots fraudulently will still get caught and punished for it. But it stands no chance of affecting the result of the election.
Matt4Liberty
Member
- Joined
- Sep 16, 2012
- Messages
- 607
A fair point. Maybe that's what should have been done instead of just pulling the data from suspect voting machines in Georgia as part of their "recount".
Invisible Man
Member
- Joined
- Dec 9, 2019
- Messages
- 4,363
What's your source for that? This article says they did recount all the ballots by hand.
https://www.npr.org/2020/11/18/9363...-concludes-vote-count-shows-biden-still-ahead
unknown
Member
- Joined
- Oct 8, 2011
- Messages
- 12,404
CaptUSA
Member
- Joined
- May 17, 2011
- Messages
- 18,922
Check the video at about 19:30.
TheCount
Member
- Joined
- Mar 15, 2014
- Messages
- 11,740
The video alleges that the votes were changed after upload.
Re-tabulating the votes from each machine would still catch the fraud that's being claimed in this video.
(PS: they did more than that, and ballots were counted by hand.)
TheCount
Member
- Joined
- Mar 15, 2014
- Messages
- 11,740
There's no sources and no main points. They stitched together graphics and videos that they found on the internet. Half of the video is a still shot of what looks like a page from a user manual for election software.
Basically, the argument is that they don't like numbers from the data feed which is used by news organizations and to the secretary of state on election day for instant reporting and allege that maybe someone, but they don't know who, how, or at what level, fiddled with the numbers somewhere between the voting precinct and when the data got reported on ABC News. And they don't know by how much or which precincts or counties were affected.
What they don't seem to understand is that feed is not actually the official count of votes...
Similar threads
