Galactic Lord Xenu
Member
- Joined
- May 27, 2007
- Messages
- 20
Maybe he justified it under the general welfare clause. Federal agencies are currently charged with setting vaccination policies which could be harmful. This study could influence current policies.
That's not how he interprets the General Welfare clause.
I'm guessing he's introducing this on the behalf of a constituent and that he might vote against it, or since vaccines are mandated by the government he decided that we might as well shed light on any possible risks (and thus help get rid of them).