Islamic extremist kills 50 at Orlando gay nightclub

Inside job. It is to perfect.

This will help them push Islamiphobia, removal of gun rights, and anti discriminatory laws all at the same time.
What fucking world do you live in where "they" push "Islamophobia"? The narrative from The Cathedral and the government after every single one of these attacks is that it "has nothing to do with Islam". Look at the narratives pushed by the media and academia before bloviating about what "they" push.
 
Nope..
Rushed and sloppy.. That was why my first post was about investigation.

No media and no reporters are even touching the real questions.

The thread title should be changed,, as misleading..
Police Kill 50 wound 50 in Orlando Club.

How many were killed by Police?

How many are acceptable?
 
Orlando shooter Omar Mateen was previously investigated by the FBI

http://www.cnn.com/2016/06/12/us/orlando-shooter-omar-mateen/

FBI failed.

Here FBI, have some more resources because you suck so bad.

Probably gonna have to fight them over there, so we don't have to fight them over... uh... um... er... wait a minute...

Shed moar blood, kill moar liberty, throw moar bad $ down bad hole, at least we're doing something...:rolleyes::mad:
 
British progs are so upset by the realization that Muslims hate gays that they're storming off national TV in a huff:



It's been said by many before me, but it bears repeating: 2016 is the year progressivism implodes.
 
What $#@!ing world do you live in where "they" push "Islamophobia"? The narrative from The Cathedral and the government after every single one of these attacks is that it "has nothing to do with Islam". Look at the narratives pushed by the media and academia before bloviating about what "they" push.

Are you actually claiming that there hasn't been a push to promote fear of Islamic terrorism? Are you honestly claiming that "terror" has not been used as a pretext for never-ending war and unconstitutional legislation?

It doesn't matter that Obama is not saying that Islam is at fault, they want the public to come to that conclusion themselves. Gotta have a boogeyman, at all times, gotta have someone or something to use as a pretext to push their agendas. younglibertarian was absolutely correct.
 
Orlando's history with the LGBT community is very complicated. A few years ago it would have been and to someone looking in from the outside it would seem that way but as a whole Orlando is much more accepting of the LGBT culture than most cities. I don't think he knew what he was talking about or he got fed crappy info from someone who did a cursory search on the internet. Bad research can be blamed on laziness and a rush to get something anything to say on the air in an event that (as sad as it is that this is true) will garner more viewers.

Or it was just part of spinning a narrative that gays are so persecuted and have so few "safe spaces", therefore sexually confused cross dressers and other types must be let into the intimate spaces of the opposite sexes and HB2 and anything like it must be repealed.

I'm going with my analysis.
 
Are you actually claiming that there hasn't been a push to promote fear of Islamic terrorism? Are you honestly claiming that "terror" has not been used as a pretext for never-ending war and unconstitutional legislation?

It doesn't matter that Obama is not saying that Islam is at fault, they want the public to come to that conclusion themselves. Gotta have a boogeyman, at all times, gotta have someone or something to use as a pretext to push their agendas. younglibertarian was absolutely correct.
There's been a push to promote fear of terrorism as a tactic. Muslims happen to be extremely over-represented as perpetrators of said tactic., The Cathedral goes out of its way to talk about how wrong it is to "blame it on Islam". They would love it if there was more white terrorism, especially racially motivated terrorism. It would feed the narrative beautifully. The engines of public opinion are academia and the MSM. Look at what they're saying and see how many people are going to talk about the problems inherent with Islamic society, and how many are going to instead talk about gun control and homophobia. The video I posted above is an excellent example of just that.
 
The thread title should be changed,, as misleading..
Police Kill 50 wound 50 in Orlando Club.

How many were killed by Police?

How many are acceptable?

From Info Wars:

The Warning Signs of a False Flag Operation:

~There is an immediate comprehensive narrative, including a convenient culprit. Law enforcement, government agencies, and the mainstream media immediately proffer a narrative that completely explains the event and encourages citizens to tie their intellectual understanding of the tragedy to the emotions they experience. In his lecture at Contact in the Desert, Richard Dolan noted that a distinguishing characteristic of a false flag operation is that the official narrative IS NOT questioned by the media. There are often legislative, ideological and sociopolitical power plays waiting in the wings, which the government can immediately implement. The most striking example of this is the Patriot Act, which was written well before 9/11 but seemed to correlate entirely with the events that had transpired.

~The official narrative has obvious domestic and geopolitical advantages for the governing body. The Bush administration used 9/11 to usher in the War on Terror, which has served as a lynchpin for countless civil liberty infringements by the national security state, including ubiquitous domestic surveillance and indefinite detention. It also directly paved the way for an invasion of Afghanistan and Iraq—countries that had nothing to do with the attacks—allowing our government and defense contractors to control the natural gas pipelines and oil fields. This bears a striking resemblance to Operation Ajax.

~The narrative behind the attack serves to leverage emotions like fear, as well as patriotism, in order to manufacture consent around a previously controversial issue. For example, many of the recent domestic terror attacks, including the Aurora shooting, have exacerbated and reinforced advocacy of gun control legislation. More importantly, these attacks divide populations and invite the government and militarized local police forces to have the authority to declare martial law at will, locking down entire neighborhoods.
 
CIA and Mossad are going live with these things now. The drill/hoax days are over. If you're in a southern state it would be wise to avoid "agenda friendly" venues and events. By "agenda friendly" I mean venues/events that fit with the media narratives like gay gatherings, minority rallies, etc.
 
There's been a push to promote fear of terrorism as a tactic. Muslims happen to be extremely over-represented as perpetrators of said tactic., The Cathedral goes out of its way to talk about how wrong it is to "blame it on Islam". They would love it if there was more white terrorism, especially racially motivated terrorism. It would feed the narrative beautifully. The engines of public opinion are academia and the MSM. Look at what they're saying and see how many people are going to talk about the problems inherent with Islamic society, and how many are going to instead talk about gun control and homophobia. The video I posted above is an excellent example of just that.

They push irrational fear of Islam. They play the good cop/bad cop game while they do it. Democrats defend those in this nation and whine about rednecks targeting them, which is yet another effective divide and conquer tactic. The Republicans thinly veil their fomenting of hate between a pair of religions that are more similar than different by talking about Islamic terrorism rather than about Islam itself. And Televangelists, who basically run paid commercial programs for Israel, attack Islam directly.

The lady is right. Islam is put up as a boogeyman.
 
Are you actually claiming that there hasn't been a push to promote fear of Islamic terrorism? Are you honestly claiming that "terror" has not been used as a pretext for never-ending war and unconstitutional legislation?

It doesn't matter that Obama is not saying that Islam is at fault, they want the public to come to that conclusion themselves. Gotta have a boogeyman, at all times, gotta have someone or something to use as a pretext to push their agendas. younglibertarian was absolutely correct.

See, these scripts where an Islamic fundy is the perp are tricky. They use the Muslim perp/s to push a police state and national security crackdown. The nightmare going in France is a perfect example of where they want to go with this. OTOH, they have to keep the globalist multicuturalism is so peachy narrative going in order to keep up the mass immigration agenda to destroy societies. Therefore they trot out someone like the guy from CARE to remind the sheeple that killing gays is against the Qu'ran and Muzzies are just really misunderstood, tolerant neoliberals who love America. The left totally buys that narrative, while the right does not. The left wants a police state aimed at white conservatives, not them or their pawns. They'll take a police just for that. The right reacts in fear to Islamic terror and goes along with more police state. The left willingly engages in cognitive dissonance because they must remain anti Christian multiculturalists at all costs. Never mind that lots of Muslims countries kill gays. They'll buy the CAIR guy's story. The right (and I mean mainstream sheeple) don't buy the friendly muzzie narrative at all and take the story at face value: ISIS. Both sheeples, left and right, going along with needing more police state. Where they divert is over guns which the left want outlawed and the right says f/ck that noise.

This should bring out more Democraps to vote in November but it could do the same for Trump.

I'll add that I am anti Muslim immigration but I also know when a Muslim is a just a prop or character in a play.
 
See, these scripts where an Islamic fundy is the perp are tricky. They use the Muslim perp/s to push a police state and national security crackdown. The nightmare going in France is a perfect example of where they want to go with this. OTOH, they have to keep the globalist multicuturalism is so peachy narrative going in order to keep up the mass immigration agenda to destroy societies. Therefore they trot out someone like the guy from CARE to remind the sheeple that killing gays is against the Qu'ran and Muzzies are just really misunderstood, tolerant neoliberals who love America. The left totally buys that narrative, while the right does not. The left wants a police state aimed at white conservatives, not them or their pawns. They'll take a police just for that. The right reacts in fear to Islamic terror and goes along with more police state. The left willingly engages in cognitive dissonance because they must remain anti Christian multiculturalists at all costs. Never mind that lots of Muslims countries kill gays. They'll buy the CAIR guy's story. The right (and I mean mainstream sheeple) don't buy the friendly muzzie narrative at all and take the story at face value: ISIS. Both sheeples, left and right, going along with needing more police state. Where they divert is over guns which the left want outlawed and the right says f/ck that noise.

This should bring out more Democraps to vote in November but it could do the same for Trump.

I'll add that I am anti Muslim immigration but I also know when a Muslim is a just a prop or character in a play.

Yep. The final goal is order out of chaos. Right now it's about using different groups for their own agendas, pitting groups against eachother, distracting people from what's really going on and divide and conquer.

 
British progs are so upset by the realization that Muslims hate gays that they're storming off national TV in a huff:



It's been said by many before me, but it bears repeating: 2016 is the year progressivism implodes.


Haha, that was great. I hope you're right. That's what I meant about their fake dramas getting tricky. They're trying to tick all of the boxes in this but some of those boxes conflict.
 
They push irrational fear of Islam.
Fear of Islam is entirely rational. Just look at the EU.

They play the good cop/bad cop game while they do it. Democrats defend those in this nation and whine about rednecks targeting them, which is yet another effective divide and conquer tactic. The Republicans thinly veil their fomenting of hate between a pair of religions that are more similar than different by talking about Islamic terrorism rather than about Islam itself. And Televangelists, who basically run paid commercial programs for Israel, attack Islam directly.
You're missing who it is that actually has narrative power. It's not the Republicans. It's not the Democrats. It certainly isn't televangelists. It's the media and academia. The latter is especially powerful. They control the Overton Window. They are the Cathedral. The narrative from said Cathedral is that Islam is peaceful, that it's only one percent of Muslims who are extreme, and that all religions are equally harmful in their fundamentalist variations. That narrative is spinning out of control as time goes on, and as more data is compiled.

Watch what the MSM and the universities do with this tragedy. They'll bring on moderate liberal critics of Islam like Sam Harris, just so they can chastise him for being "Islamophobic". It's happened every single time something like this occurs. Why would it change now?
 
Fear of Islam is entirely rational. Just look at the EU.


You're missing who it is that actually has narrative power. It's not the Republicans. It's not the Democrats. It certainly isn't televangelists. It's the media and academia. The latter is especially powerful. They control the Overton Window. They are the Cathedral. The narrative from said Cathedral is that Islam is peaceful, that it's only one percent of Muslims who are extreme, and that all religions are equally harmful in their fundamentalist variations. That narrative is spinning out of control as time goes on, and as more data is compiled.

Watch what the MSM and the universities do with this tragedy. They'll bring on moderate liberal critics of Islam like Sam Harris, just so they can chastise him for being "Islamophobic". It's happened every single time something like this occurs. Why would it change now?

If we act like they speak with one voice, people rightly decide we're idiots.

They target specific audiences with interlocking narratives, which simultaneously divide us against each other and also support the other narratives. I didn't say the Democrats control the narrative, or that the Republicans control the narrative, or that the Israeli propagandists on the televangelist channels control the narratives. I said the Democrats push from this side and the others push from that side. The fact that they operate a pincers movement is not evidence they separately control separate narratives. The fact they operate a pincers movement is evidence that they are doing different things on different orders from the same control source in order to achieve a common goal.

Now. What am I missing, exactly?

As for the EU, what do you know about it? Are you posting from Europe? Or are you listening to the MSM, which as you seem to be happy to admit, is pushing a boogeyman narrative?
 
Last edited:
Haha, that was great. I hope you're right. That's what I meant about their fake dramas getting tricky. They're trying to tick all of the boxes in this but some of those boxes conflict.
It will take time, but the narratives they've been spinning are coming apart at the seams. It used to be that the progressive narrative was very nice, very neat and a pretty easy sell.

-Race is a social construct
-Gender is a social construct
-Black underachievement is the result of racism
-White achievement is because of white privilege
-The wealth of the West is mostly stolen and comes from imperialism and slavery
-Islam is a religion of peace, and only one percent of Muslims are radicals
-All religions are equally bad, and religious fundamentalism is the real problem
-Diversity is "our strength"
-Mass immigration improves the country

Etc. There was a time when one could claim these things, and it seemed to have a lot of explanatory value. All of those claims are imploding. I warn against being too optimistic though; a cornered animal can lash out.
 
Yeah, because racism never caused terrorism, it always decreased it.

What does wanting to curb immigration have to do with "racism"? Further, Muslim is not a race. Furthermore, what valid reason is their to import foreign Muslims, anyway? There isn't one other than the multikulti globalist social engineering agenda.
 
Back
Top