I watched it.
It referred to Gravel saying pot was healthier than alcohol. The discussion that ensued simply discussed the issue, not Gravel.
The pro-freedom message was delivered by Jonathan Hoenig:
http://www.capitalistpig.com/
I forget who the anti-liberty prohibition message was, but he mentioned at times "I don't trust the American people" on this issue. Hoenig pointed that out, but failed to ask why we should trust the anti-liberty message because it couldn't be trusted either.
Ron Paul was mentioned as someone who does support the end of The Drug War.
Fox also repeated the crap that Giuliani's proposed tax cut will be the largest in history. I have several issues with that:
1. That is inaccurate. I know Jefferson halved the US budget in his time. If they are measuring in current dollars, then they (Fox/Giuliani) are simply being dishonest.
2. It has not been passed into law.
3. If we take all proposals that haven't been passed into law, Ron Paul's proposal will be much, much larger than Giuliani's.
Someone raised the issue that drug prohibition may only be an issue drug users or those convicted on drug use care about, and only those people. This can be restated to reach a broad audience, such as:
1. Stopping the drug war stops infringements on liberty that occur in law enforcement.
2. Stopping the drug war saves American taxpayers tens of billions of dollars per year for non-violent crimes.
3. Stopping the drug war eliminates violent crimes in the same way Prohibition did.
4. Stopping the drug war stops enriching the Taliban via the heroin trade (the same argument should be made with high oil prices and war too).