"The fact is that our Union rests upon public opinion, and can never be cemented by the blood of its citizens shed in civil war. If it can not live in the affections of the people, it must one day perish. Congress possesses many means of preserving it by conciliation, but the sword was not placed in their hand to preserve it by force."
-James Buchanan
Buchanan had it right.
Article III section 3:
Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort. No Person shall be convicted of Treason unless on the Testimony of two Witnesses to the same overt Act, or on Confession in open Court.
The Congress shall have Power to declare the Punishment of Treason, but no Attainder of Treason shall work Corruption of Blood, or Forfeiture except during the Life of the Person attainted.
So a peaceful revolution is actually legal?
Depends on one's point of view. But in principle, secession is a peaceful process whereby the people of a state say they have had enough of the country club membership and choose to leave the union. There really is nothing the rest of the states can do about it, save to bring violence to bear, either openly or through passive aggressions against the land-locked states by closing borders and airspace in order to isolate them politically, economically, and materially. This, of course, is a gross violation of the sovereign rights of that state's individual human residents.
At such a point any material violence mounted by a seceded state against those waging war against them could not in all good reason be construed as treason, but rather only as self defense.
Yet there is another dimension to this. Imagine a state wanted to secede for the purposes of instituting an absolutely vicious authoritarian regime such as that of China, the Soviets, or even worse (can there be worse??). Do we now see this as legitimate, particularly if a significant proportion of the people there are not in agreement with such a move? What if their plans were to kill all the Negroes... or maybe all the Jews.... puppy dogs or kittens or whatever personally would outrage you the most? Perhaps NAMBLA instituting a state so they can buttfuck little boys. What then? Is a population's personal outrage sufficient reason to interfere?
I am trying to point out just how stupidly pointless and nonsensical these political subdivisions are. "states" and "nations".... all bullshit. Pure, utter bullshit. Freedom is the only answer for the human race that stands a snowball's chance in hell of preserving us into the future. Big Bro and Mustafa Mond will drive us ever deeper into a new dark age. Hell, they already
have. Make no mistake about it folks, we are currently entering the second great dark age and the door is shutting quickly behind us. And it is like a great vault door. Thick. Heavy. Resistant to the torch and explosives. Once closed, we are going to have a hell of a time prying it open again and probably will not for many generations to come.
The funniest thing about all of this is that this is like the baggage people carry with them throughout life, weighing them down. It could end at any time if all they did was relax their hands and let them go. So it is with "government" and the phony baloney "authority" it claims to carry. If people simply stopped obeying, especially in the real bullshit areas like paying taxes, getting driver's licenses, smoking dope, contracting with ho's and so forth, what would "government" do, beside sit there and pound salt up its own asshole? Nothing. It would be unable. If every decent citizen drew a gun and pointed it a cop who was violating our fellows, cops would fall silent, quiescent, and fearful of us as they should be. If we shot the bastards every time they brought injury to one of us, they would learn to demur and would inevitably quit to do something more suited to their levels of intellect like being school janitors.
The human world is such a mess because people's minds are. Rotten thinking leads to rotten attitudes which leads to rotten action. The choices are in our hands but most of us do not want to take responsibility. Always let the other guy do the dirty work. Don't rock the boat. Escape notice. Blend in. These are the precepts and principles of the lazy and cowardly.
How is it that a guy walks out of a Walmart in NV, gets shot dead by the cops and all that the rest of the people there can do is stare on in stupefied amazement? Why did they not draw their own weapons and hold the police as suspects until the truth came out? That event nutshells much of what is wrong with the people of the United States. We have become complacent pussies just like the Euros and timid cowards like the Chinese, ever more ready to lick the boots of authority in the hopes of ingratiating themselves to the master in anticipation of a miserable crumb or two from his lavishly set table. It is disgusting.
I say do not bother with secession from the union, for the states are no better than the feds, but only marginally smaller implementations on the same tyrannic pattern. Secede from government! Just stop cooperating. Give them nothing. Force them to become ever more brazen and to work ever more hard to take from you that to which they hold not title. Ahow them your ass and bid them kiss it...
if you allow them even that much honor.
Believe it or not, a return to feudalism may be the best interim solution we have. Community feudalism at perhaps the county level where the local governments tell the state to fuck off and by extension the same to the feds. Well armed communities ready and willing to slaughter all who presume authority over free and sovereign people. Kill enough of them and they will back off if it comes to that, but in the meanwhile, starve them out through a refusal to participate in the came and refusal to comply with their ridiculous and unjust mandates. Bottom up is the only way because there are not nearly enough at the top to affect change from yon dizzying heights.