Is Rand our man or not?

[compromise]

I'm not a big GJ fan either, but I don't think this little dig was necessary.

You can't expect people to take a guy who turns up to interviews baked seriously.

 

[Tywysog Cymru]

You can't expect people to take a guy who turns up to interviews baked seriously.

I want to see that interview.

 

[erowe1]

I'm not a big GJ fan either, but I don't think this little dig was necessary.

Since GJ used that as a selling point for himself, I don't consider a dig.

 

[T.hill]

*sigh* LE, I'm voting for Rand; he still has my support. He doesn't have my 100% agreement with all of his rhetoric, however, and his most ardent supporters are a bit annoying with their hypersensitivity to any criticism. That's my story, and I'm sticking to it.

Criticise Rand as you would anyone else or as you would Ron, but don't criticise him as though he's something lesser qualitatively. Criticising Rand on a situational basis is fine, but expect a response to counter-argue that criticism as you would expect the same from a ron paul supporter for ron.

What I have seen some do is treat Rand as something qualitatively worse than Ron for frivolous reasons. Exaggerating those frivolous reasons by pointing out how someone is so much better than Rand is kinda unfair and really splitting hairs.

How would you react if during rons campaign there was always a certain percentage of people who purposely pointed out superficial percieved flaws and claimed he was less of a liberty candidate for it?