Is it time to start filing FCC complaints?

Thanehand

Member
Joined
Nov 23, 2007
Messages
668
I'm beginning to think that it's time to use big government against big media. Over the last few weeks I've been wondering about what might happen if hordes of Paul supporters started filing FCC complaints each time any of the major news media manipulates the presidential election in favor of specific candidates, whether that's by not allowing equal talk time or by stating something incorrect or defaming against.

The debates last night, the commentary that followed it and the blatant errors in the transcript of the debate on CNN's site was nothing but a disservice to the American people and cemented it for me.

So I'm going to begin filing FCC complaints for every instance of unfairness in media regarding the presidential race. This includes candidates other than Ron Paul, but my focus will be on Ron.

Worst case, this will have no impact. Best case, a record of transgressions by the media will be well documented, can generate a story in itself, and force the media to issue LOUD retractions for each infraction, potentially helping the Ron Paul campaign as a side effect.

Any thoughts/feedback? You can file a general complaint with the FCC by following the directions here:

http://www.fcc.gov/cgb/broadcast.html

[edit]

Updated the link above and noted that that page says:

"FCC rules generally do not govern the selection of programming that is broadcast. The main exceptions are: restrictions on indecent programming, limits on the number of commercials aired during children's programming, and rules involving candidates for public office."
 
Last edited:
What are some of the best examples of specifics that we can put in our complaints?
 
I think this is definitely an idea worth exploring. I'm sure we have a few lawyers among us
 
Off the top of my head:

* I've lost track of how many times CNN has listed the presidential candidates, but only listed three or four, excluding Ron, Tancredo, Hunter

* The blatant misquote in the CNN transcript (which has been fixed)

* Commentators last night calling Ron a kook, referencing so called "imagination" that is actually easily verifiable

* The disproportionate amount of time given to the candidates during the debate

* The lack of serious questions given to the candidates at the debate (ie. wasting time on a baseball question and giving good questions only to a few candidates)

* Commentators and interviewers stating that Ron will not win -- even to his face.

The list goes on and on.
 
What does the FCC have to with CNN?? the CABLE news network...

The FCC is the place to file complaints about stuff that's been broadcast. There are many groups that do - notably religious watchdog groups (not saying that's a good thing or not).

On the FCC broadcast website it specifically states:

"FCC rules generally do not govern the selection of programming that is broadcast. The main exceptions are: restrictions on indecent programming, limits on the number of commercials aired during children's programming, and rules involving candidates for public office."

So I'm tending to believe that if enough people complain about the abuse, it might make an impact.
 
The FCC is the place to file complaints about stuff that's been broadcast. There are many groups that do - notably religious watchdog groups (not saying that's a good thing or not).

On the FCC broadcast website it specifically states:

"FCC rules generally do not govern the selection of programming that is broadcast. The main exceptions are: restrictions on indecent programming, limits on the number of commercials aired during children's programming, and rules involving candidates for public office."

So I'm tending to believe that if enough people complain about the abuse, it might make an impact.

CNN is NOT broadcast. It's on cable.
 
Dude the FCC has nothing to do with cable news. You all will just sound like uninformed whiney kids.

Uh... no. If we are factual and cover the fact that it's not just Ron Paul, we'll sound like informed, pissed-off American's who are tired of the abuse.

Again, from the FCC site:

"FCC rules generally do not govern the selection of programming that is broadcast. The main exceptions are: restrictions on indecent programming, limits on the number of commercials aired during children's programming, and rules involving candidates for public office."
 
I'm down.

I've tried to be patient and understanding, but last night was the last straw. I had relatively high hopes/expectations for last night, and it ended up being the worst "debate" yet!!!

I'm angry, and I'm ready for some justice. :mad:
 
it is a private station, I am not going to complain it is their RIGHT to ignore Dr Paul
 
"FCC rules generally do not govern the selection of programming that is broadcast. The main exceptions are: restrictions on indecent programming, limits on the number of commercials aired during children's programming, and rules involving candidates for public office."

Once again: CNN is NOT broadcast television
 
Once again: CNN is NOT broadcast television

You keep repeating yourself, but it doesn't mean anything to me. From what research I've done, the FCC regulates cable in a number of ways. From their site:

"The FCC and local franchising authorities are responsible for enforcing a variety of cable television regulations."

Let's not forget the Broadcast Decency Enforcement Act of 2005 (not that it applies here). And technically, with government mandating no more broadcast television, your argument makes even less sense.

And as I've stated more than once, there are rules about presidential candidates on TV. There is no "official" place to file complaints about what is seen on TV other than the FCC web site, so it appears appropriate. I'm still trying to find the specific rules.
 
It may or may not work in regards to CNN, but we can certainly do this for local stations that air unfair or inaccurate reports (for instance, the other thread mentions a local news station which rebroadcast McCain's attack, but not Dr. Paul's response, etc.) Here is a letter that the AFA, a very powerful religious/family values organization, sent to local station managers over a Hardee's ad.

Pay attention to the last request-- "please place this letter in a file to be reviewed by representatives of the FCC"-- because this is GUARANTEED to GET THEIR ATTENTION EVERY TIME. There is no more effective way to get a result than to let them know that not only are you upset, but you know the rules that govern the very licensing of their station, and they are required to let the FCC hear about this.


> Dear local television manager,
>
> I am highly offended by the content in the latest Hardees/Carl's
> Jr. television commercials... (details)... In my
> opinion, they violate local community standards.
>
> Because you are licensed to serve the public interest in our
> community, I request that you refuse to air these ads. If you are
> already airing
> them, I ask you to stop.
>
> As required by law, please place a copy of this email letter in your
> station's public file, to be readily available to FCC representatives,
> specifically during the license renewal period for your station.
>
> Sincerely,
>
>
> ___________
>

-----------------------------
Libertarian Girl
http://www.libertariangirl.com
 
I can see this working only if you had several people in one local area mail different renditions of that letter but not the same thing. Otherwise it would just be spamming.
 
Back
Top