Is al Qaeda Coming To Town? Another Attack

[New York For Paul]

"They (al Qaeda) know they are killing us economically and this is a wonderful benefit to them. Trillions of dollars later and the reality is that we haven’t really made much progress against al Qaeda or Islamic terrorism in general. The benefit to this is that they know that the weaker we are economically, the more difficult it will be to recover from a massive terrorist attack."

"We were doing just fine economically in 2001 before the attacks and look how bad it hurt our economy. As the economy grows weaker each day now, we become a more attractive target as to time frame. They told us years ago that they would benefit from our failing economy as we fought them through time. Now as our economy fails, they are watching and waiting to strike. They watch the markets as closely as we do."

"If they hit us during September or October of this year, we would slip into an all out economic depression. They are simply waiting to strike. Al Qaeda cannot afford to allow the American economy to rebound. We are a tougher adversary if our economy is strong. They will opt to kick us while we are down."

"Where we beat them back in Iraq, they gained in Somalia and Algeria. Where we pushed them into the mountains in Afghanistan they simply flourished east in the mountains of Pakistan where we are forbidden to hunt them and kill them."

"All we have done is rearrange the chess board. "

http://www.homelandsecurityus.com/20080919RT

 

[Johnnybags]

If they must kill the infidels please

do it in Washington DC. Err, you may even get an applause from a few.

"They (al Qaeda) know they are killing us economically and this is a wonderful benefit to them. Trillions of dollars later and the reality is that we haven’t really made much progress against al Qaeda or Islamic terrorism in general. The benefit to this is that they know that the weaker we are economically, the more difficult it will be to recover from a massive terrorist attack."

"We were doing just fine economically in 2001 before the attacks and look how bad it hurt our economy. As the economy grows weaker each day now, we become a more attractive target as to time frame. They told us years ago that they would benefit from our failing economy as we fought them through time. Now as our economy fails, they are watching and waiting to strike. They watch the markets as closely as we do."

"If they hit us during September or October of this year, we would slip into an all out economic depression. They are simply waiting to strike. Al Qaeda cannot afford to allow the American economy to rebound. We are a tougher adversary if our economy is strong. They will opt to kick us while we are down."

"Where we beat them back in Iraq, they gained in Somalia and Algeria. Where we pushed them into the mountains in Afghanistan they simply flourished east in the mountains of Pakistan where we are forbidden to hunt them and kill them."

"All we have done is rearrange the chess board. "

http://www.homelandsecurityus.com/20080919RT

 

[GunnyFreedom]

I have never repeat never believed that 9/11 was 'an inside job,' but as early as 5 years ago I was telling everbody I know that if there were another major terrorist attack on CONUS around Sept/Oct 2008, that it would almost CERTAINLY have to be an inside job, based entirely on who stands to benefit. The above article seems primed to prep the sheeple for just such an event.

 

[Johnnybags]

What is CONUS?

please

I have never repeat never believed that 9/11 was 'an inside job,' but as early as 5 years ago I was telling everbody I know that if there were another major terrorist attack on CONUS around Sept/Oct 2008, that it would almost CERTAINLY have to be an inside job, based entirely on who stands to benefit. The above article seems primed to prep the sheeple for just such an event.

 

[liberteebell]

What is CONUS?

Continental United States.

You have to forgive those military types--they speak only in acronyms.

 

[GunnyFreedom]

LOL, yeah, sorry about that. My speech tends to become even MORE clipped when I'm posting from my phone.

 

[moostraks]

my sceptical side says that it seems we are being prepped for market failure by tptb. Meaning I wonder who is really the one waging psychological warfare on the public, an Islamic extremist group or homeland security?

 

[New York For Paul]

Pakistan Hotel Hit

http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D93AIBQG0&show_article=1

Many times they can predict something big, but they get the wrong part of the world.

The US Embassy in Yemen got hit too.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/video/2008/sep/17/yemen.bomb.us.embassy?gusrc=rss&feed=worldnews

There might be more attacks on the way.

 

[ladyjade3]

Do we seriously think that after Afghanistan and Russia, Al Qaeda didn't learn anything about monetary policy? Oh, right. The mujahideen beat Russia because WE helped.

People keep talking about the grave ramifications of NOT bailing out Wall Street. No one but RP is talking about the graver ramifications OF bailing them out. This is why you don't get yourself into this mess in the first place. We are left with NO GOOD OPTIONS.

 

[liberteebell]

http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D93AIBQG0&show_article=1

Many times they can predict something big, but they get the wrong part of the world.

The US Embassy in Yemen got hit too.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/video/2008/sep/17/yemen.bomb.us.embassy?gusrc=rss&feed=worldnews

There might be more attacks on the way.

And all because of what? Our lovely meddling foreign policy. No doubt some idiot will call for even more intervention.

And why would al queda waste any resources here? Our own government is doing a bang up job of destroying our country without any outside assistance.

 

[TastyWheat]

I have never repeat never believed that 9/11 was 'an inside job,' but as early as 5 years ago I was telling everbody I know that if there were another major terrorist attack on CONUS around Sept/Oct 2008, that it would almost CERTAINLY have to be an inside job, based entirely on who stands to benefit. The above article seems primed to prep the sheeple for just such an event.

I don't think so. If Bin Laden and Al Qaeda really knew the overall exhaustion Americans have with this War on Terror then he'd know that a decisive attack could throw off the election, maybe postpone it and cause another massive surge of troops and stir up domestic discontent. If an attack did occur before the election almost everyone would blame the Republicans and that might actually be the straw that breaks the camel's back.

 

[moostraks]

I don't think so. If Bin Laden and Al Qaeda really knew the overall exhaustion Americans have with this War on Terror then he'd know that a decisive attack could throw off the election, maybe postpone it and cause another massive surge of troops and stir up domestic discontent. If an attack did occur before the election almost everyone would blame the Republicans and that might actually be the straw that breaks the camel's back.

Some here will tell you that would be precisely why it would be considered an "inside" job. Read up on NSPD-51 for a continuity of government plan in the event of a catastrophic event. This was signed in May 9,2007. Furthermore read into the statements made by the McCain campaign communications deputy director Michael Goldfarb on the near dictatorial powers of the executive branch of government in matters of foreign policy and war.

Furthermore polls have indicated(FWIW) that McCain polls ahead of Obama in matters of national security. We all know " experience" is important for the job of POTUS. We have been having this drilled into our heads so we can comprehend a McCain win in November....

 

[moostraks]

Also worth noting is how the creation of behemouth companies who reap huge profits requires a US taxpayer bailout because we must save the global market due to its "catastrophic" effects. Seems like we are being primed here for a continuity plan on many levels.

 

[New York For Paul]

Another update on attacks.

"Urgent military command - a blessed jihad throughout the world"

Expect more truck bombs to target U.S. & Western assets, including hotels, embassies, military installations, etc.

"The truck bomb was constructed of at least 1300 pounds of military grade explosives. The blast left a crater nearly 60 feet wide and 24 feet deep. From start to finish, from planning through the execution phases, the bombing contained all of the hallmarks of an al Qaeda operation."

http://www.homelandsecurityus.com/20080921TKbombs

 

[RickyJ]

I don't think so. If Bin Laden and Al Qaeda really knew the overall exhaustion Americans have with this War on Terror then he'd know that a decisive attack could throw off the election, maybe postpone it and cause another massive surge of troops and stir up domestic discontent. If an attack did occur before the election almost everyone would blame the Republicans and that might actually be the straw that breaks the camel's back.

Uh folks, Bin Laden is only a bogeyman and Al-Qaeda is a CIA invented and funded group which is referred to as "the toilet" in many Arab nations. Bin-Laden is also more than likely dead. He most likely died in December 2001. The obvious phony tapes of him that our government said were legit is proof that they are only using him now as a bogey man. Damn, the sheeple are so easy to fool. Public education has just about destroyed this nation.

 

[New York For Paul]

Spies Warn That Al Qaeda Aims for October Surprise
Intercepted Messages Asking Local Cells To Be Prepared for Imminent Instructions

http://www.nysun.com/foreign/spies-warn-that-al-qaeda-aims-for-october-surprise/86326/

 

[Charles Wilson]

Uh folks, Bin Laden is only a bogeyman and Al-Qaeda is a CIA invented and funded group which is referred to as "the toilet" in many Arab nations. Bin-Laden is also more than likely dead. He most likely died in December 2001. The obvious phony tapes of him that our government said were legit is proof that they are only using him now as a bogey man. Damn, the sheeple are so easy to fool. Public education has just about destroyed this nation.

+1

I would like to add that if we were not throwing our weight around by forcing other countries, especially the Arab countries, to accommodate American troops on their soil; we would not have a terrorist problem. Ron Paul has made this point over and over but no one will listen.

Leaders in foreign countries know that once Uncle Sam sets foot on their soil they will become a permanent force that cannot be removed. The country of Myanmar (Burma) refused aid from the US following a major storm that decimated the country for this very reason. They opted to starve rather than give up their sovereignty. http://www.workers.org/2008/world/myanmar_0522/

 

[metalmike06]

Regardless of troops being overseas, I think attacks would be less possible if our idiot president CLOSED OUR BORDERS. 12 million people have flooded across the border since 9/11. And here we are, SEVEN years later, with the president still saying "we need to secure the border from terroristststs."

To be honest, I think there is going to be an attack after the new president takes office. Especially if Obama is the president. Al Qaeda knows Americans generally think McCain would be "tougher on terror" by sending more troops into more countries (exactly what bin Laden wants). So if Obama is president, and then there is an attack, people would continually vote for a Republican or somebody who will always send more and more troops over thinking it will make things better. Al Qaeda has most likely been in the US for a long time and are still here planning another attack. They're just waiting for the right time. They want people to think only clumsy Bush Republicans can keep the country safe.