Zippyjuan
Banned
- Joined
- Feb 5, 2008
- Messages
- 49,008
Hanging out with Jake in Illinois again?Not enough for me and my women.
Hanging out with Jake in Illinois again?Not enough for me and my women.
Considering it's just you and a few of these ladies-Not enough for me and my women.
Considering it's just you and a few of these ladies it should be more than enough...unless you take up an expensive hobby.
Inflation, my friend. inflation.
Depends where you live. Speaking from experience 35K in Richmond, VA goes MUCH farther than 100K in San Francisco.
If you plan on moving that often then yes, rent. Invest the total amount and live off the return in the meantime until you are ready to buy. Then you will still have your $1 million to work with. A 5% return on that would be $50k a year which is slightly higher than the median income in the country.
Not a chance in hell at this age. Maybe if I was 65 and had SS, medicare, and a paid off house and car.
It depends on what you consider retiring.
If you buy a modest house, paid cash...and then outfit it to be fully energy independent with year round food production capability (greenhouse)...chicken coup...etc...then as long as you are ok working "part time" to maintain your little operation...then 1 mill will get you very far.
It depends on what you consider retiring.
If you buy a modest house, paid cash...and then outfit it to be fully energy independent with year round food production capability (greenhouse)...chicken coup...etc...then as long as you are ok working "part time" to maintain your little operation...then 1 mill will get you very far.
If you're sustenance farming, than you can hardly call that "retired" in the first place.
I like to travel and eat good foods and drink good drinks though. I don't think I could be content living a life like that forever. Or maybe I could be. I don't know.
And the big things your missing in that equation are medical and dental costs. That's going to eat up a lot of your savings quickly.