I don't think because they get one poll wrong that they would go under.
Iowa PPP Poll 12/27: Paul 24%, Romney 20%, Gingrich 13%, Bachmann 11%
- Thread starter Havax
- Start date
I don't think because they get one poll wrong that they would go under.
GunnyFreedom
Member
- Joined
- Nov 28, 2007
- Messages
- 32,882
I know the guy who owns PPP and the guy who runs it. It really doesn't add up. Dean is a hard core libdem but he is very invested in his polling accuracy. Sorry guys, I know the people who run PPP personally. I'm not buying your theories.
The_Ruffneck
Member
- Joined
- Nov 20, 2007
- Messages
- 540
So if Paul isn't in the lead the poll must be rigged and if Paul IS in the lead the poll must also be rigged?
Chillax , these guys seem very neutral with their reporting.
That is very good to hear GunnyFreedom. Not the part about them being libs or Dems, but that you don't think they would ever skew a poll for financial gain.
Kluge
Member
- Joined
- Dec 2, 2011
- Messages
- 2,416
I'm really surprised how well Ron's favorability numbers have held up through the newsletter smears.
Paul: 53% favorable, 40% unfavorable, 7% unsure
Romney: 44% favorable, 47% unfavorable, 9% unsure
Gingrich: 37% favorable, 54% unfavorable, 9% unsure
Paul: 53% favorable, 40% unfavorable, 7% unsure
Romney: 44% favorable, 47% unfavorable, 9% unsure
Gingrich: 37% favorable, 54% unfavorable, 9% unsure
Sunstruck-Eden
Member
- Joined
- Sep 3, 2011
- Messages
- 368
SOOOO HAPPY RIGHT NOW.
I seriously had this maniacal smile on my face for a minute or two. My mom was scared.
I seriously had this maniacal smile on my face for a minute or two. My mom was scared.
lol. I guess we're a little paranoid after being an underdog for so long.
Steppenwolf6
Banned
- Joined
- Nov 26, 2011
- Messages
- 465
ah ah ah
They are actually trying to reveal to us and the general public:
We-are-now-officially-irrilevant.
And:
"we are irrilevant in a repubs primary,which is theoretically our bread and water"
What a dumbfq parade of losing clowns.
With the way they are attacking Ron Paul right now and almost completely ignoring him in the debates, not to mention the very real voter fraud in NH in 2008. With all that and whole lot more going on, I don't think we are paranoid at all.
The elite are indeed against Ron Paul and will try every dirty trick, legal or not, to make sure he is not the next president.
Good. agree with this. Another way to go would be to make a page with links to these sites, if a good url existed. http://parocks.com/iowabig.jpg is 300dpi 8.5 x 11 - suitable for printing out. check this http://parocks.com/ronpaul/iowa.html - it shares pretty well on facebook
Eric21ND
Member
- Joined
- Jul 17, 2007
- Messages
- 5,954
Double your efforts and donations to ensure victory!
The old ones don't get on the internet too much and get most of their news from the lame stream media. The women probably don't care for Paul too much cause he doesn't look to them as good as the other candidates do. For those that are women here, sorry about that, but many women do vote for someone based on how they look. If a good looking woman was running she would also get votes from men based solely on that. So it goes both ways, I'm not trying to make women look bad here.
Kluge
Member
- Joined
- Dec 2, 2011
- Messages
- 2,416
They knew what freedom was like 50+ years ago... and don't want it. Prohibition worked, stopping socialists from distributing anti-draft literature saved the nation, and we need to intervene in Asia to prevent the spread of Communists who'll always hate us for our commitment to human rights.
Thank God! I admit to experiencing more than a touch of angst over the last few days about the kind of effects the recent media smears might have on our man's polling numbers, but it looks as though it was unwarranted; this poll was conducted after the "Ron-Paul-is-a-crazed-bigoted-degenerate" mantra had been blaring at 100 decibels on most every major news outlet for close to a week, and the sliming doesn't appear to have had any effect. We need only keep the ship steady for a few more days now.
Yep, it does appear that their attempts to smear as a racist is not working on Iowa voters. I hope the same is also true for NH voters and the rest of the states.
The old ones don't get on the internet too much and get most of their news from the lame stream media. The women probably don't care for Paul too much cause he doesn't look to them as good as the other candidates do. For those that are women here, sorry about that, but many women do vote for someone based on how they look. If a good looking woman was running she would also get votes from men based solely on that. So it goes both ways, I'm not trying to make women look bad here.
Old people and women like government more than young people and men.
Similar threads
