Invasion USA

https://twitter.com/TPostMillennial/status/1789441288120737958



But, but, but... if he's a true conservative, which he is NOT, why doesn't he tell his constituents that before spending money to do anything, the funding to the DHS and the NGO's that are transporting them should be cut, so that we can avoid the endless-money-spending loop?

One would think after 8 years since he first held office, [certainly after running a tight ship business NOT] the guy would know anything about how it works.

Oh I get it: I'll bet he tries again to push his National ID/eVerify his next term in office. That way he'll know "them" from "us" ;-)
 
...why doesn't he tell his constituents that before spending money to do anything, the funding to the DHS and the NGO's that are transporting them should be cut, so that we can avoid the endless-money-spending loop?

Because some of them want these gladiator games, this upcoming circus, to last a while.
 
Because some of them want these gladiator games, this upcoming circus, to last a while.

They must have an awful lot of money to blow. Incredible amounts, even. Chances are, they're going to leave the circus very disappointed.
 
But, but, but... if he's a true conservative, which he is NOT, why doesn't he tell his constituents that before spending money to do anything, the funding to the DHS and the NGO's that are transporting them should be cut, so that we can avoid the endless-money-spending loop?

One would think after 8 years since he first held office, [certainly after running a tight ship business NOT] the guy would know anything about how it works.

Oh I get it: I'll bet he tries again to push his National ID/eVerify his next term in office. That way he'll know "them" from "us" ;-)

I agree, he should do exactly that but you are right he'll probably push more ID and more police state.

Nobody will do what I say...

I already gave you a solution that requires no new tax money, requires no intrusive ID requirements, requires no "Constitution Free Zones", requires no long period of time to set up, requires no permanent structures be built, will have immediate results and is constitutional.
 
I agree, he should do exactly that but you are right he'll probably push more ID and more police state.

Nobody will do what I say...

Sometimes I'm accused of talking about money too much. But, it really does come down to that. Plus, how else could I afford another bike in these trying times?

Btw, what do you and [MENTION=12430]acptulsa[/MENTION] think about that Hard Bikes in the other thread? I'm still debating between that, and Indian or a self-build, but I needs me a little peer-pressure to get things rolling :redsmiling:
 
These people are willing pawns, but pawns none the less. Idk what's going to happen, but it's not gonna be boring. I'm a cosmopolitan Urban dweller Ron Paul Thomas Massie fanatic, and even recent Mexican immigrants are flummoxed, pissed off, and see us as their comrades rather than new arrivals
Despite skin color similarities. Not the alphabet people Latinx whatevers that show up on the screens, but the get stuff done working men in the trenches of life. Maybe just the ppl I know.
 
  • Like
Reactions: PAF
Agreed.

Invaders...these people are inavders.

I still call bullshit on “invaders”.

Maybe recommend to the mod a thread title change to FED/DHS/NGO Sponsored Trafficking, if you want to spread the message of the root cause of the problem?
 
I still call bull$#@! on “invaders”.

Maybe recommend to the mod a thread title change to FED/DHS/NGO Sponsored Trafficking, if you want to spread the message of the root cause of the problem?

You have a point. When two administrations in a row have been paying the fare, you have some reason to feel invited.
 

https://x.com/EndWokeness/status/1792543404028486105

"Nobody's talking about the main issue here, and that's gun laws. They need to change"

:rolleyes: [1]

STFU

FAFO



[1] That was a stupid enough response just given the scenario in which the "victim" willingly chose to participate - but it's an especially stupid response, given that the shooter was on probation and was not legally permitted to have a gun in the first place (because of already-existing "gun laws").
 
Back
Top