Initiation into the Cartel

[OferNave]

bump

 

[Eroberer]

I am interested now in reading the first edition of Tragedy and Hope.

That was a very interesting thing to read, thanks for the post.

 

[ourlongroad]

I am interested now in reading the first edition of Tragedy and Hope.

Before you dig into that large book, you may wanna check out the following web page which provides an overview
http://mailstar.net/tragedy.html

 

[diggronpaul]

This says it all, right here, doesn't it?


The World is ruled on deception, and yet forum posters

seem to think that there are thought leaders and institutions

working in the publics best interest.


It's self-delusion perpetrated by a public afraid to rip-the-veil off.


Time to grow up!

Organisms typically base their success primarily on de-

ception and rely on actual force or mutually advantage-

ous trade (symbiosis) as little as possible. This should be

nearly self-evident, but is generally overlooked due to the

moral codes we elitists foist on our subjects.


Not only is fraudulent bluff and bluster used to achieve

dominance but fraudulent altruism and collective institutions

are used to conceal dominance once achieved. Human hier-

archies, in contrast to the animal variety, are best sustained

when the members are deluded regarding the oppressive na-

ture, or better, even the very existence of the hierarchy!


Visible rulers are highly vulnerable. Thus we see visible

rulers claiming to be representatives of God, the common

good, the material forces of history, the general will (either

through vote or intuition), tradition, or other intellectual

"spooks" that serve to lessen the envy of the ruled for the

rulers. Encouraging such self delusions among the masses of

the ruled is universal for visible governments.


By embracing deception wholeheartedly at every level,

finance capitalism, or rule through money, has fashioned

the ultimate system yet devised for the secure exercise of

power. Men like your father, the hidden masters of finance

capitalism, govern those who govern, produce, and think

through invisible financial tentacles...... Dominance in all

aspects of society is surreptitiously accomplished while the

great majority of the ruled, and even most of the visible

leaders, believe themselves to be fairly autonomous......



Nearly everyone believes major decisions to be the vector sum of autonomous

pressures exerted by business, labor, government, consum-

ers, social classes, and other special interests. In fact, the

vectors of societal power are carefully balanced by us so that

any net movement is in a direction chosen by us. The only fly

in the ointment is the occasional, but extremely messy,

interferences by competing financial dynasties.

 

[limequat]

Bump, for the post of the year.

Sticky, please!

 

[InterestedParticipant]

Bump, for the post of the year.

Sticky, please!

I vote for sticky too!

 

[diggronpaul]

Yeah, sticky it!

 

[JoshLowry]

bumping for more sticky requests

 

[lucius]

Sticky, please...

 

[diggronpaul]

What... no sticky?

 

[lucius]

sticky

 

[ourlongroad]

I'm adding the following, while somewhat slightly off-topic, it's a critical piece of understanding...


"Evolution, of course, was just what the founders of communism needed to

explain how mankind could have come into being without the intervention of any

supernatural force, and consequently it could be used to bolster the foundations of

their materialistic philosophy. In addition, Darwin's interpretation of evolution–that

evolution had come about through the operation of natural selection–gave them

an alternative hypothesis to the prevailing teleological explanation of the observed

fact that all forms of life are adapted to their conditions."

Malthus, Darwin, and Marx.

Darwinism and Marxism have in common that each purported to have discovered propelling forces causing exponential human development, ie, ‘evolution’. Darwinism proposes inevitable organic mutation of human beings; Marxism proposes a societal equivalent.

This notion of inevitable human flux wasn’t new. Hegel made it a central premise of his philosophy. Malthus applied it to his theory of inevitable overpopulation.

Darwin’s grandfather, Erasmus Darwin, had proposed an evolution hypothesis during the late 18th century that didn’t catch on:

“Would it be too bold to imagine that, in the great length of time since the earth began to exist, perhaps millions of ages before the commencement of the history of mankind would it be too bold to imagine that all warm-blooded animals have arisen from one living filament, which the great First Cause endued with animality, with the power of acquiring new parts, attended with new propensities, directed by irritations, sensations, volitions and associations, and thus possessing the faculty of continuing to improve by its own inherent activity, and of delivering down these improvements by generation to its posterity, world without end!”

This was the notion grandson Charles Darwin set out to prove.

Marx and Engels embraced Darwinism immediately. :

Marx wrote a socialist friend in January, 1861: "Darwin's book is very important and serves me as a basis in natural science for the class struggle in history."

Engels stressed the importance of Darwin's having developed a theory opposed to religion:

“He (Darwin) dealt the metaphysical conception of nature the heaviest blow by his proof that the organic world of today — plants, animals, and consequently man too — is the product of a process of evolution going on through millions of years.”[1]

The American researcher Conway Zirckle explains why the founders of Communism immediately accepted Darwin's theory

“Marx and Engels accepted evolution almost immediately after Darwin published The Origin of Species. Evolution, of course, was just what the founders of communism needed to explain how mankind could have come into being without the intervention of any supernatural force, and consequently it could be used to bolster the foundations of their materialistic philosophy. In addition, Darwin's interpretation of evolution–that evolution had come about through the operation of natural selection–gave them an alternative hypothesis to the prevailing teleological explanation of the observed fact that all forms of life are adapted to their conditions.”[2]



[1] Conway Zirkle, "Evolution, Marxian Biology and the Social Scene", (University of Pennsylvania Press, 1959), pp.85-87
[2] Conway Zirkle, "Evolution, Marxian Biology and the Social Scene", (University of Pennsylvania Press, 1959), pp.85-86

 

[Jace]

...

 

[PatriotG]

Im actually afraid to read this!

But I will.

 

[nayjevin]

I thought this was common sense?

 

[Bill M DC]

Bump for sticky

 

[Sandman33]

Excellent stuff. Thank you for posting it. Here are some things that jumped out at me.

Weaknesses of the Money Lord:

• Visible rulers are highly vulnerable.
  
• The power of such elites or cults diminishes as their occult knowledge is transformed into "scientific" knowledge and vanishes as soon as it becomes "common sense."
  
• The power of our finance capitalist money cult rests on a similar secret knowledge, primarily in the field of economics. Our power is weakened by real advances in economic science.
  
• The Central Bank is the primary monopoly on which all our monopoly power depends.
  
• The real danger arises in the upper-middle classes. Occasionally, these people make vast fortunes through some brilliant technological innovation in their business or through the favor of local politicians that escape our influence.
  
• Graver danger is presented by those whose enterprises are so successful as to be self-financing.
  
• The anarchy of private education in which any manner of dangerous ideas could be spread cannot be tolerated.
  
• We do not want an educational system that produces hard-driving individuals bent on amassing great wealth and power.
  
• No crisis is more serious for our Money Power than an attempt by a head of government to assume personal control of intelligence and operations or to by-pass existing agencies by setting up parallel ones.
  
• Our empires are too fragile to risk all-out battles for supremacy among ourselves.

I am convinced that the real-world Money Lords are bent on achieving their endgame of world government, which will destroy our Republic.

I think a lot of us here wish to preserve the Republic and our Constitution, and hold back the Leviathan.

So to resist, we must go around their media and their educational complex so that people can see who they are, what they are up to and what the endgame actually is. Obviously, a free and open Internet is our main weapon in this.

More difficult is the amassing of large independent pools of capital by hard-driving, rugged individualists who can self-finance opposition to the Money Lords. Ron Paul showed that we can amass enough capital to put the scare into the them.

Electing politicians who share our goals is another way to resist.

The Fed is their primary source of power at this time, so abolishing it through the Congress would set them back in spades. But, Andrew Jackson showed this is no easy task, as the Central Bank can fight back by instigating a severe depression and with assassination attempts. I don't see any politician out there now other than Ron Paul with the backbone of Jackson, and Ron is getting up there in years.

My dad, who has a Ph.D. in education and who sees himself as a history buff, actually believes the Federal Reserve came about as a Progressive response to the Robber Barons. He has no understanding at all of the Fed and when I try to engage him on the subject he dismisses me as a conspiracy theorist and a wacko. He doesn't want to hear it. Bush is the source of all that's wrong with this country and that's that. My dad was against the war in Iraq, but he supports Obama in Afghanistan. I can see my dad giving Obama the benefit of the doubt if he attacks Iran -- which he would never support if Bush did it. My sister is an elementary school teacher who loves Obama and sees herself as a moderate, compassionate liberal. If I try to talk to her about the Fed her eyes glaze over and I'm her wacko brother. And this is just by questioning her if she knows the history of the Fed and how it works! I might as well be talking to my dog. She is clueless about economics and she has a master's degree in education! To her, Obama is going to fix everything with "hope" and "change" and that's all she can verbalize. But she believes, and that's what matters!

Educating people about the Fed and getting them to understand how it is the cause of our ills more so than Bush is going to be a real challenge. Fortunately, Bernanke is highly visible and an unlikeable person who appears incompetent and nervous. Getting people to focus on him and this Geithner crook and their wrongdoings is a slam dunk, especially with the two of them being so visible lately. They are to blame and it can't be said enough.

The lemmings might start to wake up to the fact that Obama is basically a frontman for these bankers who are leading us off a cliff. They might start to listen to Ron Paul now. He is the real deal and has our interests at heart, but it's just a matter of getting them to open their eyes. He warned us during the campaign and he was the one who was right, not all these Republican/Democrat phonies.

Maybe they will wake up and the "occult knowledge" will become "common sense," although the way my family and friends rejected Ron Paul for Obama makes me wonder. All the facts and debate and persuasion that I used on them could be washed away by some 30-second spot they saw on CNN, MSNBC or FOX.

The Jedi mind tricks of the press are highly effective on the weak-minded, and the Money Lords have known this forever.

EXCELLENT POST. Yes I feel the same way and get the same reaction when mentioning the fed. Waking people up is VERY VERY hard.

 

[sharpinla]

INTRODUCTION
Part 1 of 12


My Son, the time has arrived to make formal what you
have confidently awaited for some years. Of all your
brothers, sisters, and cousins, as well as the offspring of my
close allies, I have chosen you to be heir to my empire. All
the trust funds, foundations, and accounts through which my
empire is controlled shall pass into your hands upon my
retirement. All my alliances, understandings, and enmities
with my handful of peers around the globe shall gradually
become yours. Over the next twenty years we shall collaborate
closer and closer, you and I, until, we finally act as one.

Boy this is sure making its rounds. This is the third forum I've seen it on in the last two weeks.

 

[Original_Intent]

Read the whole thing; nothing terribly surprising but an interesting presentation.

Definitely should be read by everyone.

 

[ourlongroad]

Boy this is sure making its rounds. This is the third forum I've seen it on in the last two weeks.

It was posted in January, so its been seen by quite a few people here over the last 6-months. Maybe those other forums have members that also frequent RPF?