In Fox Debates!

[stevedasbach]

Not seeing anything confirming this online. I suspect he's still excluded.

 

[UnReconstructed]

He should tell Faux to kiss his presidential ass.

 

[Humphreysguitar]

I have to disagree as being on the fox debate can only help him, because he will get much more exposure to the mainstream american audience. Right now what we need is for more people to get to watch him speak and learn about his message.

 

[IHaveaDream]

I have to disagree as being on the fox debate can only help him, because he will get much more exposure to the mainstream american audience. Right now what we need is for more people to get to watch him speak and learn about his message.

Getting invited to a discussion doesn't necessarily mean that you get to speak. RP will end up being the designated spectator.

 

[Alvination]

With him having such a different message, I can totally see the other candidates attacking him. Then he'll defend his positions properly, thus getting more airtime since this is a forum and not a debate. More mainstream exposure is good.

 

[Johncjackson]

We dont need FNC's short bus.
We need the alternative hour long town hall.

 

[TownHall08]

I'll attribute a quote to Roger Ailes, president of Fox News Channel, chairman of the Fox Television Stations Group and media consultant for Richard Nixon, Ronald Reagan, and George H. W. Bush, as well as for presidential candidate Rudy Giuliani’s first mayoral campaign in 1989: "We're not programming to conservatives. We're just not eliminating their point of view."

In other words, it's more about the message your audience hears rather than not.

Getting Ron, who can handle himself in debates, on TV is crucial to getting his message out.

Phil Donahue, a Nader 2000 Co-Chair and a TV personality with a 26-year run on national (U.S.) TV made an interesting comment in the following video:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MyvVQYf6XWk

Should we continue boycotting Fox's advertisers once Ron is included? We'll see...