Impeachment is a constitutional tool. Let’s use it against Kennedy and Roberts

johnwk

Member
Joined
Jul 19, 2008
Messages
2,729
Impeachment is a constitutional tool. Let’s use it against Kennedy and Roberts

.

Enough has not been said or written about the same sex marriage case until the people pressure the House of Representatives into drawing up articles of impeachment against Roberts for his judicial tyranny in the Obamacare case, and against Kennedy for his judicial tyranny in the same sex marriage case. In each of these cases, neither the text of the Constitution or the legislative intent of our Constitution supports their written opinions. What they both did was use their office of public trust to impose their personal views of justice, fairness and reasonableness upon the entire population of the United States. And that amounts to judicial tyranny!

Keep in mind the following quote: "The whole aim of construction, as applied to a provision of the Constitution, is to discover the meaning, to ascertain and give effect to the intent of its framers and the people who adopted it." HOME BLDG. & LOAN ASS'N v. BLAISDELL, 290 U.S. 398 (1934)

The American People need to organize a million citizens demonstration in front of our Supreme Court and demand these two tyrants be impeached. If the people do not rise up and show their outrage and demand the impeachment of these two, we will have ”Submit[ted] to despotism . . . and . . . concede[d] the principle" as stated by John Adams.

We have been amply warned about submitting to attacks upon our Constitution:

”Submit to despotism for an hour and you concede the principle. John Adams said, in 1775, “Nip the shoots of arbitrary power in the bud.” It is the only thing a people determined to be free can do. Republics have often failed, and have been succeeded by the most revolting despotisms; and always it was the voice of timidity, cowardice, or false leaders counseling submission, that led to the final downfall of freedom. It was the cowardice and treachery of the Senate of Rome that allowed the usurper to gain power, inch by inch, to overthrow the Republic. The history of the downfall of Republics is the same in all ages. The first inch that is yielded to despotism - the first blow, dealt at the Constitution, that is not resisted, is the beginning of the end of the nation’s ruin.” ___ THE OLD GUARD, A MONTHLY JOURNAL DEVOTED TO THE PRINCIPLES OF 1776 AND 1787.

Now, the only question is, will the American People organize a million citizens demonstration against these two? And while we are at it, against three others on our Supreme Court who defy both the text and legislative intent of our Constitution?

JWK

"The public welfare demands that constitutional cases must be decided according to the terms of the Constitution itself, and not according to judges' views of fairness, reasonableness, or justice." --
Justice Hugo L. Black ( U.S. Supreme Court Justice, 1886 - 1971) Source: Lecture, Columbia University, 1968
 
Viable solutions are impossible from within the system, because the system is the problem.

Kind of like asking the police to police the police eh?

Government is doing exactly what it was intended to, grow.........
 
Kind of like asking the police to police the police eh?

Government is doing exactly what it was intended to, grow.........

Correct sir!

No offense to you Johnwk, I always like your post. I just don't think the jailers will allow the prisoners to overthrow them with words on paper or public pressure. Look at how INSANE the anti war movement was during the Vietnam war, did it stop even one person from dying?
 
In what universe are the moronic idiots of Murica prepared for such a task?

50% of people in this country couldn't spell impeachment much less get behind an initiative to remove life-appointed (pseudo) justices form the bench.

Sorry... I'm far too cynical to entertain such fantasies.
 
Push secession.

Prisoners: "Dear Warden, please allow me and cell block B to leave and become our own, free entity"

Warden: "Get back to work slaves, we just let gays get married, that's all the freedom you're getting this century"
 
Push secession.

Which is less authoritarian:

'You all must be involved'

or

'None of you can choose to be involved'?

We can attract non-authoritarians in all parties to our message if we don't make is so they must conform to our rules.
 
Prisoners: "Dear Warden, please allow me and cell block B to leave and become our own, free entity"

Warden: "Get back to work slaves, we just let gays get married, that's all the freedom you're getting this century"
You sound defeated. If so, I would just go back to ignoring politics altogether. Otherwise, you need some sort of goal to push towards with realistic expectations.
 
Back
Top