Immigration to Redistribute 26 Congressional Seats to Blue States for 2022 Election

Joined
Aug 31, 2007
Messages
117,537
Study: Immigration to Redistribute 26 Congressional Seats to Blue States for 2022 Election

https://www.breitbart.com/politics/...ongressional-seats-blue-states-2020-election/

JOHN BINDER 22 Dec 2019

The nation’s illegal and legal immigration system will help shift 26 congressional seats, primarily from red states, and redistribute them to mostly blue states next year, according to new analysis.

Every year, the United States imports about 1.2 million legal immigrants who largely arrive to reunite with foreign relatives already in the country. This level of annual legal immigration is in addition to the hundreds of thousands of foreign workers who arrive on work visas every year and nearly a million illegal aliens who successfully enter the U.S.

Research by the Center for Immigration Studies’ Steven Camarota and Karen Zeigler finds that annual illegal and legal immigration to the U.S. will redistribute political power in the form of 26 House seats away from a number of red states and towards massively populated blue states like California and New York.

“To put this number in perspective, changing the party of 21 members of the current Congress would flip the majority in the U.S. House,” Camarota and Zeigler note.

Ohio, a swing state that voted for President Trump in 2016, will get three fewer congressional seats in 2020 due to mass immigration in other states. Michigan and Pennsylvania, also states that voted for Trump in 2016, will each have two fewer congressional seats. Wisconsin, a Trump-supporting swing state, will have its congressional seats cut by at least one.

Red states such as Alabama, Arkansas, Georgia, Idaho, Indiana, Iowa, Kentucky, Louisiana, Mississippi, Missouri, North Carolina, Oklahoma, South Carolina, Tennessee, Utah, and West Virginia, Camarota and Zeigler predict, will all get one less congressional seat in 2020. Smaller blue states such as Minnesota and Rhode Island will each receive one less congressional seat.

Those seats cut from mostly red states will be redistributed to California, the most immigration-inundated state in the country. California, by 2020, is set to gain 11 congressional seats solely due to the fact that noncitizens, rather than just American citizens, are counted in congressional apportionment.

Likewise, New York — where nearly 40 percent of residents are foreign-born — is set to gain four more congressional seats and New Jersey, with a more than 22 percent foreign-born population, will also take an additional two congressional seats.

Texas, which has become increasingly blue due to immigration and out-of-state young people, will gain another four congressional seats, as will the swing state of Florida with its foreign-born population of 4.1 million.

The deeply blue states of Illinois and Massachusetts, both of which went 55 to 60 percent for Democrat Hillary Clinton in the 2016 presidential election, will each gain one congressional seat.


As Breitbart News has chronicled for years, the counting of only American citizens to divide up congressional districts and electoral college votes would shift power away from the affluent, metropolitan coastal cities of the U.S. and towards middle America.

If congressional districts were set by the number of citizens, the overall average population needed per congressional seat could decrease to about 670,000 citizens per district. This would give a stronger advantage for states with small illegal alien populations to gain and keep their current number of congressional seats.

Camarota and Zeigler’s research is one component of how overall immigration is aiding in shifting power to Democrats and metropolitan cities such as Los Angeles, New York City, and San Francisco. In the upcoming 2020 election, about 1-in-10 U.S. voters will have been born outside the country.

Ronald Brownstein, senior editor for The Atlantic, noted this year that nearly 90 percent of House congressional districts with a foreign-born population above the national average were won by Democrats. This means that every congressional district with a foreign-born population exceeding roughly 14 percent had a 90 percent chance of being controlled by Democrats and only a ten percent chance of electing a Republican.

The New York Times and Axios admit that legal immigration at its current rate will continue shifting the American electorate more towards Democrat control, as discovered in the 2016 presidential election between then-candidates Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton.

Among native-born Americans, Trump won 49 percent to Clinton’s 45 percent, according to exit polling data. Among foreign-born residents, Clinton dominated Trump, garnering 64 percent of the immigrant population’s vote compared to Trump’s mere 31 percent.

The U.S. is on track to import about 15 million new foreign-born voters in the next two decades should current legal immigration levels continue. Those 15 million new foreign-born voters include about eight million who will arrive in the country through chain migration, whereby newly naturalized citizens can bring an unlimited number of foreign relatives to the country.

University of Maryland, College Park researcher James Gimpel has found in recent years that more immigrants to the U.S. inevitably means more Democrat voters, and thus, increasing electoral victories for the Democrat Party.
 
The U.S. is on track to import about 15 million new foreign-born voters in the next two decades should current legal immigration levels continue. Those 15 million new foreign-born voters include about eight million who will arrive in the country through chain migration, whereby newly naturalized citizens can bring an unlimited number of foreign relatives to the country.

Trump is here via chain migration. His grandfather came to the US (as an unaccompanied minor) to stay with his sister. His mom also came here at 18 to stay with a sister. His wife, Melania, brought her family to the US as a chain migration.
 
Trump should at least try to repeal the 1965 immigration act.
If we don't reduce mass immigration our country is going to hell.
 
Trump is here via chain migration. His grandfather came to the US (as an unaccompanied minor) to stay with his sister. His mom also came here at 18 to stay with a sister. His wife, Melania, brought her family to the US as a chain migration.

None of that changes the fact that immigrants overwhelmingly vote for Democrats.
 
Trump is here via chain migration. His grandfather came to the US (as an unaccompanied minor) to stay with his sister. His mom also came here at 18 to stay with a sister. His wife, Melania, brought her family to the US as a chain migration.
Irrelevant.
 
Trump is here via chain migration. His grandfather came to the US (as an unaccompanied minor) to stay with his sister. His mom also came here at 18 to stay with a sister. His wife, Melania, brought her family to the US as a chain migration.

Yeah and that was before these laws were imposed, don't forget many of those migrants that came to America were Euporean migrants Europeans looking to make a better life for themselves in America while Europe in those days were facing though days.


These Euporean people that came into America were educated in some of their fields. I always laugh at the democrats how they are trying to justify and try to suggest that America is migrant nation.

They tend to forget that it was a nation forged and made by Euporean settlers and Euporean migrants with educational backgrounds. Those who are coming into America from Latin and African countries how many of these migrants are even educated?
 
Trump should at least try to repeal the 1965 immigration act.
If we don't reduce mass immigration our country is going to hell.

This.

Repeal the Hart-Cellar Act

Return to the 1924 Immigration Act, signed into law by the most libertarian president the country has seen, Coolidge.
 
President Trump, speaking at the White House on Thursday, announced that he would "immediately" issue an executive order to get an accurate count of non-citizens and citizens in the United States -- a measure Trump said would be "far more accurate" than relying on a citizenship question in the 2020 census.
The move would make use of "vast" federal databases and free up information sharing among all federal agencies concerning who they know is living in the country, Trump said.
"Today I'm here to say we are not backing down in our effort to determine the citizenship status of the United States population," the president told reporters in the Rose Garden, after slamming "far-left Democrats" seeking to "conceal the number of illegal aliens in our midst."


"We will leave no stone unturned," Trump asserted. He called legal opposition to adding a citizenship question to the 2020 census "meritless," but said the ongoing judicial morass in several federal district courts made it logistically impossible to resolve the matter before the 2020 census forms needed to be printed.
Speaking after Trump, Attorney General Bill Barr said the information collected via the executive order could be useful in determining the makeup of the Electoral College and congressional apportionment.

"That information will be used for countless purposes. For example, there is a current dispute over whether illegal aliens can be included for apportionment purposes. ... We will be studying this issue," Barr said.

More at: https://www.foxnews.com/politics/tru...r-census-count
 
President Trump, speaking at the White House on Thursday, announced that he would "immediately" issue an executive order to get an accurate count of non-citizens and citizens in the United States -- a measure Trump said would be "far more accurate" than relying on a citizenship question in the 2020 census.

The move would make use of "vast" federal databases and free up information sharing among all federal agencies concerning who they know is living in the country, Trump said.

"Today I'm here to say we are not backing down in our effort to determine the citizenship status of the United States population," the president told reporters in the Rose Garden, after slamming "far-left Democrats" seeking to "conceal the number of illegal aliens in our midst."


"We will leave no stone unturned," Trump asserted. He called legal opposition to adding a citizenship question to the 2020 census "meritless," but said the ongoing judicial morass in several federal district courts made it logistically impossible to resolve the matter before the 2020 census forms needed to be printed.
Speaking after Trump, Attorney General Bill Barr said the information collected via the executive order could be useful in determining the makeup of the Electoral College and congressional apportionment.

"That information will be used for countless purposes. For example, there is a current dispute over whether illegal aliens can be included for apportionment purposes. ... We will be studying this issue," Barr said.

More at: https://www.foxnews.com/politics/tru...r-census-count

How does he intend to get his count done?

"That information will be used for countless purposes. For example, there is a current dispute over whether illegal aliens can be included for apportionment purposes. ... We will be studying this issue," Barr said.

Actually the Constitution says apportionment is to be based on the number of persons in the state- not the number of citizens. Illegal immigrants are "persons".

https://history.house.gov/Institution/Origins-Development/Proportional-Representation/

“Representatives shall be apportioned among the several States according to their respective numbers, counting the whole number of persons in each State, excluding Indians not taxed.

- U.S. Constitution, Amendment XIV, section 2
 
If they aren't "theirs" are they "ours"?

("Their" refers to the states- so no, illegal immigrants are not "theirs" since they are not states).
"Their respective numbers" means the numbers that belong to them.
Illegal invaders don't belong to them, they belong to the foreign countries they come from.
 
"Their respective numbers" means the numbers that belong to them.
Illegal invaders don't belong to them, they belong to the foreign countries they come from.

Persons in each state. They are persons. People don't belong to a state- the state doesn't own them.

“Representatives shall be apportioned among the several States according to their respective numbers, counting the whole number of persons in each State, excluding Indians not taxed.

Deny and spin all you like. It is in the Constitution.
 
Persons in each state. They are persons. People don't belong to a state- the state doesn't own them.



Deny and spin all you like. It is in the Constitution.
That part comes after the clause that limits the count to "THEIR respective numbers", only those persons that are theirs are to be counted.

Deny and spin all you like. It is in the Constitution.

Illegal invaders are not THEIRS and are part of the persons to be counted.
 
That part comes after the clause that limits the count to "THEIR respective numbers", only those persons that are theirs are to be counted.

Deny and spin all you like. It is in the Constitution.

Illegal invaders are not THEIRS and are part of the persons to be counted.
United States v. Wong Kim Ark
The 14th Amendment's citizenship clause, according to the court's majority, had to be interpreted in light of English common law tradition that had excluded from citizenship at birth only two classes of people: (1) children born to foreign diplomats and (2) children born to enemy forces engaged in hostile occupation of the country's territory. The majority held that the "subject to the jurisdiction" phrase in the 14th Amendment specifically encompassed these conditions (plus a third condition, namely, that Indian tribes were not considered subject to U.S. jurisdiction[4])



Invaders are not legally here and therefore can't be treated as being here for legal purposes, they are not residents in the eyes of the law.
 
Back
Top