Here is the way to be unbiased,
1)Complete unedited audio and video interviews
2)Complete unedited transcripts of meetings
3)Complete unedited voting records (you would know from this Ron has voted yes a handful of times for laws that violate his constitutional philosophy, but they were all very minor)
Keeping records such as these are the first step to being unbiased, it keeps the records out of private hand and into a researchable history.
And yes under the project I am organizing (Separate from the OP here) there is a bias to the constitution, but at that spectrum you are dealing with philosophy rather than fact, proof of this exists here, we all came here with our own perspective of things, yet we can agree when (written audio video) proof is shown.
Free trade or Fair trade or how to combine both? Is this argument being brought up much?
It seems that who is going to be in control of global warming is of more importance, closing off innovation to defeat the problem.
By simply creating the debate you create the issue, creating the issue creates interest and more debate.
What would you rather be debating over (and thus feeding the issue)? Globalization or free trade to create a non centralized natural globalization?
There is A LOT to think about here, I am slowly building up my project. And I do hope this one is able to last long enough to be a booster for future "Ron Paul's"
