"I'm not going to die at Arby's tonight. I'm just not."

[RickyJ]

It was the second time she allowed a robber into the store by being reckless?

Should have fired her after the first one.

No it wasn't her second time letting a robber in the restaurant, that was just Keith for whatever reason not being correct with the facts. It was her second violation for being alone in the restaurant.

 

[RickyJ]

Theres many reasons why Arbys fired her. First, she repeatedly violated their safety protocols despite being robbed many times. In that case, shes a huge liability. Surely, that was explained to her. Second, its a common practice that thiefs work with someone on the inside to get the job done. She was probably working with the thief.

The part in bold in just not true. It was her second violation for being alone in the store, her second time in who knows how long, she had been there nearly 23 years. What kind of restaurant is really concerned about safety and security when they won't even install any surveillance and security equipment despite being robbed three times? If she was working with the thief they would need evidence of that, they had none, the police had none, and after 23 years of working there they had no reason to think that she would be involved in something like that. Way to further tarnish the reputation of this woman who made a mistake that nearly cost her life.

 

[Keith and stuff]

No it wasn't her second time letting a robber in the restaurant, that was just Keith for whatever reason not being correct with the facts. It was her second violation for being alone in the restaurant.

When did I say that?

 

[RickyJ]

Actually, it is why she was fired. And yes, it does have something to do with her previous violation; namely, being alone in a store at night. They are very closely related policy matters.

You already said that the video did not say that. Now, after being corrected, you are changing your story.

No that was not why she was fired, but arguing with you is like arguing with a wall, it will do about as much good. She was fired for her second violation of being alone in the store.

 

[Aurave]

You have no clue how "they" treated an employee of theirs with 23 years of service. You only know that she broke company policy multiple times, and she was fired. I don't see any reason to particularly like or dislike the way in which she was terminated, nor does the factor of 23 years or 5 days make any difference.

Would you feel disgust at an employee that quit their job of 20 years so they could retire and be lazy? Do you feel empathy for the business owner who now has to deal with the increased costs of turnover associated with the training of a new employee and the loss of an experienced worker? I mean jesus the guy was working there for 20 years, helping make that business profitable, and he just leaves! No consideration for his employer. Yeah I mean sure I'll admit people can leave any job they want for whatever reason, it's probably legal or whatever, but that doesn't mean I have to like it!