I'm convinced Ron Paul is a great candidate...

But I can't say the same about some of the "supporters" I've met on this board. The apologist kind that can't accept a little honest criticism about Ron Paul's official campaign.

Calling people trolls or liberals because you disagree with them is childish. Telling them they should vote for Obama or Giuliani instead is counterproductive. Ignoring the problems with Ron Paul's campaign doesn't help Ron Paul.

It took watching this to get some perspective. You ronpaulforums.com people were not helpful.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_Fd67Dysipo

Look at it this way, at least you weren't banned yet. I feel the same way, the people on this forum are without comparable ignorance, and dissenting will only get you the boot. Don't come here for explanations or answers. And don't go to the campaign. Message me, or a few of the more intelligent and thoughtful members and we'll show you a good place to get a qualifier for Paul's position and what he most likely will do... again, big picture.


Also, don't let the Carcass of 1376 get to you, his stubborn and profoundly unmatched myopic view of reality has caused me to write some stupid things...

I've been called by him a "one trip pony" on at least five separate issues.

Go figure.
 
Also, don't let the Carcass of 1376 get to you, his stubborn and profoundly unmatched myopic view of reality has caused me to write some stupid things...

Don't try to blame me for the fact that you frequently write stupid things.

I've been called by him a "one trip pony" on at least five separate issues.

Go figure.

No, I've called you a "one trick pony", and it may have been on five different threads, but it certainly wasn't five different issues -- for you, anyway, since you somehow manage to turn everything into an attack on Christianity.

Anyway, when were you banned, and for what?
 
Last edited:
No, I've called you a "one trick pony", and it may have been on five different threads, but it certainly wasn't five different issues -- for you, anyway, since you somehow manage to turn everything into an attack on Christianity.

Anyway, when were you banned, and for what?

I was banned a week ago, "No Reason Specified" and time ban would be lifted "Never".

It was for the thread I started, which didn't include my apparently famous anti-Christian bias. (seriously though, I hug Christians daily, ask Micah).

I outlined several major issues in the same thread. The thread was fairly popular, was deleted, and I then wrote a thread about the deletion, for which I was banned.

I don't know exactly why the ban was lifted, I'm guessing someone cooled down and realized that it was probably a stupid thing to do... I also think a few people wrote in on my behalf... but I don't have proof.
 
But I can't say the same about some of the "supporters" I've met on this board. The apologist kind that can't accept a little honest criticism about Ron Paul's official campaign.

Calling people trolls or liberals because you disagree with them is childish. Telling them they should vote for Obama or Giuliani instead is counterproductive. Ignoring the problems with Ron Paul's campaign doesn't help Ron Paul.

It took watching this to get some perspective. You ronpaulforums.com people were not helpful.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_Fd67Dysipo


You invite your own beatings, posting your concerns over and over will not change Dr. Pauls position and by doing so you bring out your inner TROLL.
 
Look at it this way, at least you weren't banned yet. I feel the same way, the people on this forum are without comparable ignorance, and dissenting will only get you the boot. Don't come here for explanations or answers. And don't go to the campaign. Message me, or a few of the more intelligent and thoughtful members and we'll show you a good place to get a qualifier for Paul's position and what he most likely will do... again, big picture.


Also, don't let the Carcass of 1376 get to you, his stubborn and profoundly unmatched myopic view of reality has caused me to write some stupid things...

I've been called by him a "one trip pony" on at least five separate issues.

Go figure.

So whay whould you come here for explantions and answers when that information should be gathered from the horses mouth, I dont agree with everthing Dr. Paul says or believes in but I dont completely disrupt the forum with countless ignorant posts defending MY BELIEF. That is what many of you do and therby invite criticism
 
You invite your own beatings, posting your concerns over and over will not change Dr. Pauls position and by doing so you bring out your inner TROLL.

I think it just frustrates some people to know that Ron Paul supporters believe certain reprehensible things about people... and are willing to stomp on other people's liberties simply because they have yet to look outside the box... if "we are the leaders and ambassadors" then we should hear people out. I'm not worried about Ron Paul, I'm just trying to set a stage, or an idea in people's minds that there are others unlike them, that deserve the same protections. There are many on this forum who don't know that... and these are people who could choose to work this ignorance when an increase in state's rights is allowed.
 
So whay whould you come here for explantions and answers when that information should be gathered from the horses mouth, I dont agree with everthing Dr. Paul says or believes in but I dont completely disrupt the forum with countless ignorant posts defending MY BELIEF. That is what many of you do and therby invite criticism

The words you were looking for are: "Why" "would" "explanations" "everything" and "thereby".

Don't take it so personally. That's my mistake. I am not trying to defend my belief, I'm trying to defend my liberties. I do have that right. I also don't think my posts are ignorant. And you can count them, there are about ~320.

And as I just wrote above, I feel I can change some people's minds. Not away from Ron Paul, just away from stupidity.
 
I think it just frustrates some people to know that Ron Paul supporters believe certain reprehensible things about people... and are willing to stomp on other people's liberties simply because they have yet to look outside the box... if "we are the leaders and ambassadors" then we should hear people out. I'm not worried about Ron Paul, I'm just trying to set a stage, or an idea in people's minds that there are others unlike them, that deserve the same protections. There are many on this forum who don't know that... and these are people who could choose to work this ignorance when an increase in state's rights is allowed.

"I think it just frustrates some people to know that Ron Paul supporters believe certain reprehensible things about people... and are willing to stomp on other people's liberties simply because they have yet to look outside the box..."

I completely agree.
 
Back
Top