Not sure if this has been discussed before, but something occurred to me about Georgia and David Frum's article on Ron Paul stacking the delegate conventions there.
Let's assume that Gingrich wins Georgia and gets all or almost all the delegates there. Delegates are bound, 71 I believe. Let's assume that Ron Paul supporters stack the conventions as Frum describes. Then you have 71 Ron Paul supporters bound to vote for Newt at the convention.
Then let's assume that Gingrich drops out and all those bound Ron Paul guys become unbound.
Is this what we're up to over there? If so, that's freaking genius.
There's a saying in the talmud that goes like this:
צדיקים מלאכתם נעשית בידי אחרים - The work of the righteous is done by others for him.
Go Newt! Win us some delegates!
Let's assume that Gingrich wins Georgia and gets all or almost all the delegates there. Delegates are bound, 71 I believe. Let's assume that Ron Paul supporters stack the conventions as Frum describes. Then you have 71 Ron Paul supporters bound to vote for Newt at the convention.
Then let's assume that Gingrich drops out and all those bound Ron Paul guys become unbound.
Is this what we're up to over there? If so, that's freaking genius.
There's a saying in the talmud that goes like this:
צדיקים מלאכתם נעשית בידי אחרים - The work of the righteous is done by others for him.
Go Newt! Win us some delegates!
Last edited: