IF THIS WAS RIGGED, How would we find out????

The thing that astounds me is that there was really only a one percent change in the vote totals for every candidate from start to finish. A completely linear ballot counting trend? It just seems kinda weird. There weren't any real rallies among ANY candidate, not just ours. I would have expected to see a bump in percentage numbers for different candidates as different counties reported their tallies at different times but it never happened.
 
The thing that astounds me is that there was really only a one percent change in the vote totals for every candidate from start to finish. A completely linear ballot counting trend? It just seems kinda weird. There weren't any real rallies among ANY candidate, not just ours. I would have expected to see a bump in percentage numbers for different candidates as different counties reported their tallies at different times but it never happened.

I agree!
 
The thing that astounds me is that there was really only a one percent change in the vote totals for every candidate from start to finish. A completely linear ballot counting trend? It just seems kinda weird. There weren't any real rallies among ANY candidate, not just ours. I would have expected to see a bump in percentage numbers for different candidates as different counties reported their tallies at different times but it never happened.

I have a mathematician friend. I'll ask him how likely this is to happen.

If you look from town to town, you see sometimes Paul beats guiliani and huckabee, sometimes he beats guiliani, it should not have been so regular as the tally came in over a 6 hour period of time.

The only thing that I noticed changed all night was Hilary and Obama switched places from the early voting tallies.
 
Last edited:
There is just NO way this all is correct! Plain common sense it takes to see this FRAUD!
 
I don't really see how it can be right either...

When I talk to people in KY, like 70% of them are enthusiastic about Ron Paul.

And I know the volunteers work a LOT harder than I do, so it just seems unrealistic that he would only get 8% in NH with all that buildup.

I really hope this get straightened out.
 
Is there any news on this yet? Anything?

Thank YOU to the caller on CSPAN!
 
From ABC,
Please read!

h ttp://blogs.abcnews.com/thenumbers/2008/01/new-hampshires.html
 
Recount? OK, we are forgetting one small detail.

It is impossible to recount votes entered through Diebold voting machines.

There is no real paper trail. A "recount" from a "hacked" or dishonest Diebold machine will simply produce the same fraudulent results.

If 200 people voted for Ron Paul in a Diebold machine, and the machine is programmed to subract half of his votes, the final tally is 100. A "recount" is no more than the Diebold machine producing the same incorrect result of 100 again!

The module that changes results destroys iteself when it is finished, making it impossible to detect. This is computer science at its worse, and exactly why we cannot have computers involved in counting votes!

Princeton University demonstrates all of this here:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aZws98jw67g
 
Recount? OK, we are forgetting one small detail.

It is impossible to recount votes entered through Diebold voting machines.

There is no real paper trail. A "recount" from a "hacked" or dishonest Diebold machine will simply produce the same fraudulent results.

If 200 people voted for Ron Paul in a Diebold machine, and the machine is programmed to subract half of his votes, the final tally is 100. A "recount" is no more than the Diebold machine producing the same incorrect result of 100 again!

The module that changes results destroys iteself when it is finished, making it impossible to detect. This is computer science at its worse, and exactly why we cannot have computers involved in counting votes!

Princeton University demonstrates all of this here:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aZws98jw67g


Then WHAT are we going to do about it? That can't get away with this.
 
This may be stupid but I am going to ask

Why can't Ron Paul Voters just write in Ron Paul and force them to be hand counted from here on out?
 
Then WHAT are we going to do about it? That can't get away with this.

1. Demand computers are left out of the voting process. We have gone hundreds of years without them and there is no reason for them now.

2. Establish some system where receipts are given to each voter as well as each precinct so they can be used for recounting purposes.

I'm afraid both have already been demanded, and democracy has basically been told to go fuck itself.

We are in big trouble.
 
Since it's very clear now that there was something very wrong going on...I just want some FRIGGIN justice!!
 
LOL NEW WORLD ORDER

NICE JOB

REPORT RON PAUL AT 0 VOTES IN SUTTON LOL LOL all we have to do is find 7 families (or more) who voted for ron paul in sutton county and it proves there needs to be a paper recount or a redo of the whole caucus

what would the founding fathers say? this is liberty we are talking about. REDO THE WHOLE F**CCKING THING IF THERE IS NO PAPER TRAIL


if you are near sutton (within 100 miles) drive there ASAP and look for ppl who voted for ron paul


take this new world order!
http://youtube.com/watch?v=RuYBcAULKHY&feature=RecentlyWatched&page=1&t=t&f=b
SUCK IT!


Bumb bump bump!!

Not donating to Ron Paul anymore till we see a recount.
 
Guys, if it is rigged, we can't find out. A recount would take us to Diebold, and it would say the same thing.
 
Back
Top