IF this didn't change your view on America I don't know what will

[icon124]

I know most of you already know how corrupt and deceitful this GOV'T is, but I still see those who don't want to buy into it...I don't know what else they have to do...This is terrible, and we really need to do something about this

 

[parocks]

I know most of you already know how corrupt and deceitful this GOV'T is, but I still see those who don't want to buy into it...I don't know what else they have to do...This is terrible, and we really need to do something about this

Based on what?

What is "this"?

 

[otero1]

For those of you who think everything is just "SUPER!" in this country... you are very mis-informed.

 

[xj0hnx]

Based on what?

What is "this"?

I would base it on Paul being in the lead with 46% and McCain at 16% with about 40ish% reported, then half an hour later McCain is 1st, and all three are in the 20%s.

 

[parocks]

I would base it on Paul being in the lead with 46% and McCain at 16% with about 40ish% reported, then half an hour later McCain is 1st, and all three are in the 20%s.

That's it?

Read the original source of your "lead with 46%" - read it closely.

Anything else?

 

[Michigan11]

This has been an eye opener to me.

The news media, I mean come on, they seem to be reporting what the government wants them to report.

The GOP, well let's just say, they have their own reporting to do as well, and it happens to colude with the same media they, seem to call liberal bias, yet they all report the same message, interpretations, and image.

WAKEUP! Can you hear it? The LIBERTY BELL is sounding the alarm. It's time to organize and takeover power positions one at a time, from the dirt up.

 

[parocks]

The news media reports what the bankers want them to report.
The government does what the bankers want them to do.

This has been an eye opener to me.

The news media, I mean come on, they seem to be reporting what the government wants them to report.

The GOP, well let's just say, they have their own reporting to do as well, and it happens to colude with the same media they, seem to call liberal bias, yet they all report the same message, interpretations, and image.

WAKEUP! Can you hear it? The LIBERTY BELL is sounding the alarm. It's time to organize and takeover power positions one at a time, from the dirt up.

 

[xj0hnx]

That's it?

Read the original source of your "lead with 46%" - read it closely.

Anything else?

You mean besides the Washington State Republican Party website?

 

[Ex Post Facto]

People accept Authority as the Truth, instead of Truth as the Authority. It's plain to see poorly orchastrated voting, It's plain to see media bias, and GOP bias. Whether we can prove conspiracy doesn't matter. Truth as the Authority.

 

[Fudwamper]

that first showing was an error on the spokane tv station covering the event. Those numbers where for the spokane greater area. (Although it is the second largest city in Washington.)

 

[parocks]

For those of you who think everything is just "SUPER!" in this country... you are very mis-informed.

I don't think there are any Ron Paul supporters who think that things are super.

But some Ron Paul supporters are smart enough to at least try to separate facts from BS allegations.

I haven't heard anything from Washington that raises a red flag with me yet. I'm not saying it's not there, but results that some find disappointing aren't quite the same thing as proof of voter fraud.

 

[parocks]

You mean besides the Washington State Republican Party website?

Send me that link.
Is it this one?
http://wsrp.org/News/Read.aspx?ID=7042

 

[parocks]

People accept Authority as the Truth, instead of Truth as the Authority. It's plain to see poorly orchastrated voting, It's plain to see media bias, and GOP bias. Whether we can prove conspiracy doesn't matter. Truth as the Authority.

Well, I was just wondering if there was anything at all particularly interesting today.

There certainly is media "bias" I wish there was a word that was a different, more severe type of bias. The media is always biased. But they typically don't pretend a candidate doesn't exist.

Anything of note today? I've been paying fairly close attention to Washington for the last 5 or 6 hours, and I haven't seen anything particularly interesting yet.

The thing is, it should be fairly easy to prove fraud in Washington.
I haven't seen anything close to proving fraud in Washington.

 

[xj0hnx]

Send me that link.
Is it this one?
http://wsrp.org/News/Read.aspx?ID=7042

That's the site, but that is the current count, and I don't have a time machine

 

[parocks]

That's the site, but that is the current count, and I don't have a time machine

Yeah, but as it turns out, it wasn't on there. Your numbers were from Spokane.

http://www.kndo.com/Global/story.asp?S=7847796

The numbers might have changed, but I have a screen capture of the figures.
Here's what it said:

"Spokane Republican Caucus Results: With 60% of the precincts reporting - Ron Paul 45%, Mike Huckabee 20%, John Mccain 17%, Mitt Romney 9%, Uncommitted 9%."

The typical tendency of most on this board is to first take the most positive scrap of information, second, misinterpret that information, third, extrapolate that information to the widest possible space, and fourth, cry fraud or conspiracy when the results dont match the expectations derived from faulty logic.

The way it typically works is this.
1) Somebody says something like "I was voted in as a delegate"
2) Somebody else then says something like "we won all the delegates somewhere.
3) Somebody else then says something like "we won all the delegates everywhere"
4) We don't win all the delegates everywhere and we cry conspiracy or fraud.

Of course, my example is a gross exaggeration, but that's typically the mechanism.

 

[banjojanjo]

The typical tendency of most on this board is to first take the most positive scrap of information, second, misinterpret that information, third, extrapolate that information to the widest possible space, and fourth, cry fraud or conspiracy when the results dont match the expectations derived from faulty logic.

The way it typically works is this.
1) Somebody says something like "I was voted in as a delegate"
2) Somebody else then says something like "we won all the delegates somewhere.
3) Somebody else then says something like "we won all the delegates everywhere"
4) We don't win all the delegates everywhere and we cry conspiracy or fraud.

Of course, my example is a gross exaggeration, but that's typically the mechanism.

Lol that is so true. But you forgot...

5) When the cries of conspiracy die down, people say don't worry we still got the most delegates. There's gonna be a brokered convention

 

[greendiseaser]

"we won all the delegates everywhere"

WE WON WE WON WE WON!

WE'RE GOING TO THE WHITEHOUSE !

 

[BigRedBrent]

For those of you who think everything is just "SUPER!" in this country... you are very mis-informed.

We MUST pave the streets with GREAT Educational Ads !!!
http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showthread.php?p=1228697

 

[blakjak]

I would base it on Paul being in the lead with 46% and McCain at 16% with about 40ish% reported, then half an hour later McCain is 1st, and all three are in the 20%s.

You're confused. You're comparing statewide results with results for one county.

 

[hrdman2luv]

What pisses me off, not that it would have made a big difference, but people on the wast coast seemt o favor Guiliani and Romney over those who are still in the race.
Remember California. Rudy had more votes than Ron Paul. And he had already dropped out.

Stupid stupid.