If Ron Paul is not on the ballot, I'm seriously considering Gary.

Then go INTO Uganda and eventually Iran because Gary believes in helping Israel militarily with MY money.


Unlikely. Why? WE CAN'T AFFORD IT.

You'll have noticed that INSUFFICIENTLY IDEOLOGICAL has been the rejoinder of Purists and Pouters.

Gary Johnson is a DISTINCTLY libertarian-leaning Pragmatist. We cannot AFFORD more military excursions just now. Pity. Maybe later.

Isn't RAND on deck in four years?

For the sake of argument, let's say HE HAS NO CHANCE AT WINNING. Not even the carrot "SLIM" chance.

It would STILL be good for EVERYONE BUT BAD GUYS, for Gary Johnson to be in the debates.
 
Last edited:
I intend to write in Ron Paul, but in Nebraska they don't count in write in votes unless you petition 3k names. Yeah WTF. When I was at Boys State the speaker of the unicameral was there I called him out on that and said ' How is this democracy when OUR VOTE is not counted? ' His rebuttal ' Who wants to count Mickey Mouse all day ' Me: That's still their vote, count it.

So I'm kinda torn... I may vote Gary who knows

It really is that easy. The obvious distinction being that Ron Paul is a legitimate vote, while Mickey Mouse is not. If their volunteers cannot tell the difference or have mental issues discerning the distinction between an actual person and a fictional character, than perhaps they should not be counting votes to begin with. Therefore, whenever they receive a write-in vote for Mickey Mouse, Santa Clause, Oscar the Grouch, Cookie Monster, Gumby, Mr. Monk or whatever else, simply toss it aside, but whenever they otherwise get a legitimate write-in vote for say Ron Paul, your people better be sure to count it. Period, unquestionably, without any doubt or confusion.
 
Our Mission

The Commission on Presidential Debates (CPD) was established in 1987 to ensure that debates, as a permanent part of every general election, provide the best possible information to viewers and listeners. Its primary purpose is to sponsor and produce debates for the United States presidential and vice presidential candidates and to undertake research and educational activities relating to the debates. The organization, which is a nonprofit, nonpartisan , 501(c)(3) corporation, sponsored all the presidential debates in 1988, 1992, 1996, 2000, 2004 and 2008.

Latest News

Jun 8, 2012 Media Credential Notice
Oct 31, 2011 Commission on Presidential Debates Announces Sites, Dates, and Candidate Selection Criteria for 2012 General Election
Oct 20, 2011 Commission on Presidential Debates Elects Reverend John I. Jenkins to Board of Directors
Apr 1, 2011 CPD Announces 2012 Debate Host Applicants
Jan 3, 2011 2012 Site Selection Guidelines


http://www.debates.org/


"Latest News" includes a slide show of "McCain - Obama" and "Biden - Palin".
 
Last edited:
CPD Announces 2012 Debate Host Applicants

Apr 1, 2011


The following have submitted applications to host a 2012 general election debate:


Belmont University (Nashville, TN)

Centre College (Danville, KY)

Dominican University of California (San Rafael, CA)

Eastern Kentucky University (Richmond, KY)

Hofstra University (Hempstead, NY)

Indiana University (Bloomington, IN)

Lynn University (Boca Raton, FL)

Saint Mary's College of California (Moraga, CA)

The Richard Stockton College of New Jersey (Pomona, NJ)

University of Denver (Denver, CO)

Wake Forest University (Winston-Salem, NC)

Washington University in St. Louis (St. Louis, MO)

http://www.debates.org/index.php?ma...t01detailtemplate=newspage&cntnt01returnid=80


If I wuz LOU GRANT barking orders in the newsroom, I'd tell someone to FIND OUT what accounts for The Chosen being chosen:


October 3, 2012 Air Time TBD
Location: University of Denver in Denver, Colorado
Sponsor: Commission on Presidential Debates
Participants: President Obama and the GOP Presidential nominee

October 11, 2012
Vice Presidential Air Time TBD
Location: Centre College in Danville, Kentucky
Sponsor: Commission on Presidential Debates
Participants: Vice President Biden and the GOP Vice Presidential nominee

October 16, 2012 Air Time TBD
Location: Hofstra University in Hempstead, New York
Sponsor: Commission on Presidential Debates
Participants: President Obama and the GOP Presidential nominee

October 22, 2012 Air Time TBD
Location: Lynn University in Boca Raton, Florida
Sponsor: Commission on Presidential Debates
Participants: President Obama and the GOP Presidential nominee

http://www.2012presidentialelectionn...bate-schedule/



Who is connected to whom? Alma maters, Spouses, the werks. Inquiring Minds love to hate Intrigue.

How much money is involved? Do the universities PAY or MAKE MONEY?

What does an ADVERTISING MINUTE cost during debates? How much advertising moolah do networks haul in during debates?

Have Deciders been SPREADING THE WELFARE over the years, or does the honor nestle among a Few?

Florida gets a national convention AND a presidential debate? Maybe EVERY state should elect a Bush.

Who green-lights such superficial, get-us-nowhere questions?

Academicians, of ALL people, should be comparatively easy to pressure toward INCLUSIVITY and INTELLECTUAL INTEGRITY.
 
Last edited:
Gary does not believe in going in to Iran. As he said in the Ron Paul Flix interview, he would stay out of an Iranian/Israeli war.

I'll be voting for Gary Johnson in November.
 
Meh, if we couldn't get Ron to win a nomination there is no way a smaller, less enthusiastic group will win Gary the general.
I mean lets face it, besides a few legislative and philosophical shortcomings, he simply lacks that inspirational tone that moves crowds.
Y'all can take the time out of your day if it makes you feel good, I'll be voting right here in this chair.
 
Your boy at infowars, Alex Jones, has endorsed him.

I know he was pushing him pretty hard, and Jesse Ventura has endorsed him and is pushing him in every interview. I disagree with them because this is not the guy who we want to have as the face of the freedom movement. Jettisoning principles and ideas for 'cost / benefit' bullshit is a big step backward
 
Well the "cost/benefit" approach is what changed me from a neo-con to a libertarian. It wasn't until I began watching Ron Paul that I completely understood the morality of it. The "cost/benefit" approach honestly makes more sense to me, but I suppose that's personal taste. I still like Ron more, but Gary is a very solid option in my book.
 
Well the "cost/benefit" approach is what changed me from a neo-con to a libertarian. It wasn't until I began watching Ron Paul that I completely understood the morality of it. The "cost/benefit" approach honestly makes more sense to me, but I suppose that's personal taste. I still like Ron more, but Gary is a very solid option in my book.

My problem with him is if he gets a big chunk of the vote, he's liable to be pushed as the new face of libertarianism. I wouldn't want that to happen. I don't think he's a good torch bearer for the movement as he's just Republican-lite. He's basically the stereotype of libertarianism as a 'Republican who smokes pot'. I also don't like that he was put in the Republican race to distract from Paul and said many things on the campaign trail against him that I didn't like. He's also stealing Paul's talking points about the Fed and trying to co-opt it to promote himself. No way he'd have ever said a word about the Fed had Paul not brought national attention to the issue. He's way better than Bob Barr though, I'll give him that.
 
Gary is good on pot. Make Romney lose votes for being a drug warrior.


This is a BIG DEAL, literally.

DECRIMINALIZATION OF MARIJUANA = IMMEDIATE REVENUE + IMMEDIATE SAVINGS = WIN + WIN.

Plus JUSTICE, not that we care too much about that.

Let "blame" for the inevitable fall on NEITHER Establishment party, rather, on a third-party fluke.
 
I'm not really sure what I'm going to do. It may the first time in my voting live that I abstain. We had a chance to stop the madness......hell, I don't know.
 
funny, i think a lot of the people that don't like johnson are more of the conservative strain; but maybe thats just me.


The Republican Party IS tacking harder "right".

It IS the "more conservative" strain of the Liberty Moovement that is "suddenly" mollified by making inroads within the Republican Machine and getting other Republicans into other offices.

"Suddenly", winning the Oval Office was NOT the goal or expectation in 2012...no, no, no, "we" are making "baby steps" toward setting up FUTURE REPUBLICAN GAINS which, even further in the future, will restore Liberty & Justice.

For Republicans, if not for everyone. But it's a START.
 
Last edited:
You guys are extremely picky, irrational, and stuck in your libertarian bubbles if you think Gary Johnson isn't a solid alternative to Ron Paul.

I think he's even better. Doesn't appear to be a particularly religious man, respects a woman's right to her own body and elective medical procedures, and doesn't have any apparent negative feelings towards people who live alternative lifestyles. Also, he's much better on the border issue.
 
Back
Top