If Rand Paul Loses GOP Primary, What Will You Do?

[willwash]

I'm surprised I'm the only one who voted for "vote Democratic so Rand can run in 2016".

That's why I voted for Obama in 2012.

 

[fisharmor]

I will be sure to point out here, a lot, that pandering to the establishment Republicans didn't work.

 

[Matt Collins]

What will I do?

Take the massive lists we have acquired and begin to get liberty candidates elected on the state level.

 

[Peace&Freedom]

I will be sure to point out here, a lot, that pandering to the establishment Republicans didn't work.

Massive Thread Winner.

 

[GunnyFreedom]

What will I do?

Take the massive lists we have acquired and begin to get liberty candidates elected on the state level.

Bullshit. If state level liberty candidates have ever had access to those lists we'd be 5 years ahead of where we are today.

 

[cajuncocoa]

I will be sure to point out here, a lot, that pandering to the establishment Republicans didn't work.

BINGO.

 

[Brian4Liberty]

I don't vote in public polls.

 

[thoughtomator]

I don't think the integrity of voting in this country is credible in the first place, so showing up would be completely pointless. I'd probably vote in the primary just to hedge my bets, but getting off my ass to vote for someone with zero chance of being the victor even in an honest election is a waste of time.

 

[Brett85]

I don't know. Rank and file Republican types demand that you vote for the Republican nominee, no matter who it is. People in the liberty movement demand that you not vote for the Republican nominee in the general election, unless it's Ron Paul or Rand Paul. I would rather stop listening to other people and just do whatever I feel is right. I'm getting to the point where I don't feel like I have to get permission from certain people before I can vote a certain way.

 

[Matt Collins]

Bullshit. If state level liberty candidates have ever had access to those lists we'd be 5 years ahead of where we are today.

Some of us do, and are.

 

[Christian Liberty]

I don't know. Rank and file Republican types demand that you vote for the Republican nominee, no matter who it is. People in the liberty movement demand that you not vote for the Republican nominee in the general election, unless it's Ron Paul or Rand Paul. I would rather stop listening to other people and just do whatever I feel is right. I'm getting to the point where I don't feel like I have to get permission from certain people before I can vote a certain way.

Why would you ever need permission? That's not the issue at all.

 

[mt4rp]

Apathy is essentially consent. Most people do not vote in most elections. If those who did not vote actually cared, they could take the country back.

There's a difference between not voting & taking back your consent.
When enough of us no longer consent, we will take back the country.

 

[H. E. Panqui]

William Tell Limbaughs: Apathy is essentially consent. Most people do not vote in most elections. If those who did not vote actually cared, they could take the country back.



(What an absolutely stoooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooopid statement!! Intelligent people don't 'vote' because they don't want to affirm/encourage the gd puppet creeps you Republicrats place on the stinking phony ballots...btw, if you 'cared' enough to learn even a little REALITY about your stinking money system, etc., you wouldn't be playing the fool, voting for/affirming Republicrat peckerheads every stinking ($)election..)

Btw, i apologize to others for my bad humor, but this obvious Republican shill, William Troll, has been following me around, neg. repping me, like a typical Republicrat snotty fink...i'm sure he's done it others too!)

 

[Tywysog Cymru]

Is there any chance that Baldwin would run again?

 

[William Tell]

Is there any chance that Baldwin would run again?

I kind of doubt it, I would love him to run though. His VP Darell Castle will probably run and win the CP nomination this time.

 

[William Tell]

Actually, Mr. Panqui, I rarely neg rep. There is only a small handful of people I have negged. You are kind of a special case, with your rudeness, immaturity, and downright obnoxious attitude.

I have only once voted for a GOP candidate in a general election. I am perfectly aware of the monetary system.
Your relentless name calling reminds me of Mark Levin, another obnoxious individual who knows how to annoy people.

 

[Tywysog Cymru]

I kind of doubt it, I would love him to run though. His VP Darell Castle will probably run and win the CP nomination this time.

I honestly don't know much about Castle, I assume he's similar to Baldwin. But Chuck's recent articles on the police state have been really good, I feel like now would be a good time for Baldwin's message.

 

[erowe1]

Apathy is essentially consent. Most people do not vote in most elections. If those who did not vote actually cared, they could take the country back.

By voting? No they couldn't.

 

[William Tell]

I honestly don't know much about Castle, I assume he's similar to Baldwin. But Chuck's recent articles on the police state have been really good, I feel like now would be a good time for Baldwin's message.

Chuck is awesome! I don't know much about Castle either, I would imagine he's similar though.
Maybe Baldwin would run if enough people want him to? I'm still bummed that I was not old enough to vote for him in 2008.

 

[William Tell]

I know it's early, but at this point I'm disappointed that so few people say they will stay home.

I see no benefit to staying home.

By voting? No they couldn't.

Why not? If nobody had supported Ron Paul, would we be better off?
When no pro liberty people vote, a pro tyranny candidate will win every time. When pro liberty people vote, we sometimes win. Voting for liberty candidates is an obvious conclusion.