Make that two of us. Is it that he was SO OVER-CONFIDENT re: Iowa that he decided "not to bother" campaigning there? The News says he decided to spend his time putting all his eggs into Florida's basket.
Is there some unknown strategy going on with that? Or did he just bet on a supposed sure-thing and it backfired in his JulieAnnie face?![]()
I'm gonna get "all conspiracy on ya"...
Only Iowa and New Hampshire (neither entirely) continue to use mostly manual forms of voting and vote counting. All other 48 states either vote electronically and/or count manual ballots electronically creating a situation ripe for election fraud.
By not campaigning hard in either state it gives him, as it has others in the past, the eventual explanation, "hey, i lost those states because i didn't campaign hard there. there are so few electorates at stake that i put my time and money into other states that are now bearing fruit". Well, he wouldn't say, "bearing fruit", he say, "committed to fighting global terrorism as I am", but you get the idea.
There is a good chance that Rudy will re-emerge in a grand way after New Hampshire. When he does, remember this post. The original script was for him to lose to Hillary (as in 2004 it was for Kerry to lose to Bush). Ron Paul's entry has messed this up.
