I Hope You Are Sitting Down for This!

"In a free country, LAWS cannot suddenly emerge which supercede the morality the country was founded on, by which I mean the Constitution."

I wonder how many people actually know that the wording of the constitution was changed to better suit the needs of the corporate elites?
 
PHP:
I wonder how many people actually know that the wording of the constitution was changed to better suit the needs of the corporate elites?
That's very interesting. Care to clarify?
 
How does he figure that the US government owns 82% of Microsoft, for example?

www.physorg.com/pdf163946461.pdf

In 1999, Microsoft had no bonds issued or loans so stocks would be the only way to have a share in the company. Microsoft issued the first bonds in the history of the company only this year http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/microsoft/2009208820_microsoftdebt12.html

(Link in original post takes me to an article on a judge?)

I'm a little familiar with Burien's info. From what I gather, he doesn't claim that the US Government owns 82% of MS, but that "COMPOSITE government" (all levels of government local, state and federal) does.

Hope this helps.
 
PHP:
I wonder how many people actually know that the wording of the constitution was changed to better suit the needs of the corporate elites?
That's very interesting. Care to clarify?


Sure. The Act of 1871 changed the wording from "for to "of" and capitalized all the letters in the title. Before 1871 it was called the Constitution for the united States of America, a Republic within which our rights are protected by a service-oriented government.
Afterwards it became CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, a profit-oriented corporation.

Here's a little newspaper clipping I just dug up that better explains it...http://proliberty.com/observer/20010402.htm
 
Last edited:
Sure. The Act of 1871 changed the wording from "for to "of" and capitalized all the letters in the title. Before 1871 it was called the Constitution for the united States of America, a Republic within which our rights are protected by a service-oriented government.
Afterwards it became CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, a profit-oriented corporation.

Here's a little newspaper clipping I just dug up that better explains it...http://proliberty.com/observer/20010402.htm[url]http://proliberty.com/observer/20010402.htm[/URL]

This topic properly belongs on a separate thread so I'll just make this comment:

There's no legal foundation for the claim that there are "two Constitutions." On the face of it the claim is ridiculous, because any "second" constitution would become immediately illegal and fraudulent: because there is only one legal Constitution, which is the original founding charter for this country. This is a foundational document, which means it cannot be replaced.

If you want to pursue this further, please start a separate thread as we are interrupting the OP's thread. :( Thanks. :)
 
This topic properly belongs on a separate thread so I'll just make this comment:


If you want to pursue this further, please start a separate thread as we are interrupting the OP's thread. :( Thanks. :)

That's just your opinion.
And besides, you asked me to clarify. So what you did was bait me into clarifying just so you could say it was off topic.
Pretty sneaky.
 
Last edited:
That's just your opinion.
And besides, you asked me to clarify. So what you did was bait me into clarifying just so you could say it was off topic.

I can back up my opinion, given a reasonable hearing. Read my message - I invited you to start a new thread. Why would I want to bait you?

However, at this point I have absolutely no desire to talk to you. How's that for sneaky......:rolleyes: Sheesh!
 
I can back up my opinion, given a reasonable hearing. Read my message - I invited you to start a new thread. Why would I want to bait you?

However, at this point I have absolutely no desire to talk to you. How's that for sneaky......:rolleyes: Sheesh!

blah blah blah
 
Last edited:
Back
Top