acptulsa
Member
- Joined
- Jan 2, 2008
- Messages
- 75,396
I don't understand why more people don't see this.
People do. But people are outnumbered by frogs.

I don't understand why more people don't see this.
Nothing on Kennedy assignation
Israel Derangement Syndrome.
Israel Derangement Syndrome.
Fuck that. If this shindig is going to start, let it be in my time. Let me still have the mental capacity to at least be able to repair firing pins or something.
I have no interest in passing on that responsibility to my son.
That's a hoot. I'm not sure there is a country on earth other than the US where more people have a legitimate grievance that jackboot thuggery is alive and well other than Israel. As a matter of fact I'd argue people aren't nearly deranged enough with what Israel does. But Ok Boomer....
Release the Chappaquiddick files!
Well, maybe not Bob Dole - he remains the only politician I've heard mention that there's a 10th amendment in a presidential debate.
Not to give the U.S. or Israel a pass for anything, but I'm pretty sure there are quite a large number of people in North Korea and China with grievances about jackboot thuggery that are at least as legitimate (and quite possibly more so).
Of course, it's the jackboot that happens to be on your own neck that's always the most troublesome - but even so, of the four, I know which boot I would prefer (at least, so far).
With my age and ailments, I wouldn't last through the first skirmish.
But like you, maybe I can reload magazines, hold the line as part of the 118th Immobile Militia, or, suffering from what Ben Franklin suffered from, among other things, maybe I could serve as a diplomat, while canoodling with French broads.
But neither one of us is going to make the first move to light this candle.
And nobody else seems to have the stomach for it.
If anything it's self criticism of the insignificant and cowardly man I devolved into.
For me personally, I don't want to be on my death bed having shown and led by example and teaching my offspring that sacrificing principles [even for the sake of the state] is acceptable.
But, YMMV.
So, they are guerilla warriors? (I hope so actually. I know I taught mine to keep that option open.)
Because a determination to never contradict your principles, in this world, at this point in time, picking up a rifle and fighting to the death is the only option to compromising at least some principles.
Trump had much better opportunities, and he specifically called off the Pentagon from striking back after Iran attacked our embassy by proxy and then our bases in Iraq directly.
Mine shoots better than me lol.
But, that's not what I'm talking about. I asked you before; who are you going to shoot? The millions of nurses who pump those vaccines into kids and adults without proper testing? The millions of people who make parts for the MIC because they want/need to feed their families? The millions of people who don't stand on principle and give passes to their "team"? The millions of voters who vote "lesser of evil" which does nothing but perpetuate the entire system?
Tell me, who gets shot first???
The men who come to arrest the man who resists taxes, because all taxation is theft, with which I'm sure you agree.
Or, the men who come seize arms from the citizens.
Start there, just like the patriots of 1776 did.
Maybe the men who show up to seize a father's 8 year old son to have his dick chopped off because his psychotic Marxist mother wants to turn him into a girl.
These are cases happening all around us, every single fucking day.
It's a target rich environment.
The men who come to arrest the man who resists taxes, because all taxation is theft, with which I'm sure you agree.
Or, the men who come seize arms from the citizens.
Start there, just like the patriots of 1776 did.
Maybe the men who show up to seize a father's 8 year old son to have his dick chopped off because his psychotic Marxist mother wants to turn him into a girl.
These are cases happening all around us, every single $#@!ing day.
It's a target rich environment.
Don't forget voters!
Voting, after all, is an act of aggression - and as such, retaliatory violence is warranted under the NAP.