Hunter Biden's laptop

Well, at least, no one at CNN (or any other so-called "journalists" at any of the Ministry of Propaganda's other branch offices) would have had anything at all to worry about ...

https://twitter.com/FreedomofPress/status/1442099656134209536
GQSXzPo.png
 
Last edited:
For what cause?


I'm not sure if Biden's done anything impeachable yet. Maybe? Like any modern president, he will eventually.

For influence peddling with foreign governments prior to be coming president and lying and covering this up afterwards. I mean if you aren't surprised by these revelations they are pretty damning.
 
For influence peddling with foreign governments prior to be coming president and lying and covering this up afterwards.

Seems pretty par for the course if you ask me. How early in Trump's presidency did you think that he should have been impeached? January 2016?



On a serious note though, what I've read seems to indicate that it was an entirely a money making scheme of Hunter's. What I said since the whole Hunter stuff came out is that I don't particularly think that politicians should be blamed for the bad actions of their family unless they're actively involved. My issue with Trump's influence peddling is that his children were actively involved in the decisions of government and were themselves officials of the United States government.

My answer would be completely different if Biden gave Hunter an office in the White House.
 
Seems pretty par for the course if you ask me. How early in Trump's presidency did you think that he should have been impeached? January 2016?



On a serious note though, what I've read seems to indicate that it was an entirely a money making scheme of Hunter's. What I said since the whole Hunter stuff came out is that I don't particularly think that politicians should be blamed for the bad actions of their family unless they're actively involved. My issue with Trump's influence peddling is that his children were actively involved in the decisions of government and were themselves officials of the United States government.

My answer would be completely different if Biden gave Hunter an office in the White House.

And you're the sort of conservative who mainly likes to conserve the corruption?
 
And you're the sort of conservative who mainly likes to conserve the corruption?

What corruption?

I haven't seen any investigative reporting by any respectable journalists about any corruption, or even any possibility of corruption.

And why should there be any of that, anyway?

After all, Hunter Biden never actually had a desk in the White House. How could a [Vice] President possibly be involved in his son's possible corruption if his son didn't even have a desk in the White House? That's just silly! (And a nameplate, too! He would certainly have needed some kind of official nameplate for his desk, with some kind of official title engraved on it. I mean, come on! How could anyone do nepotistic corruption without an official title?)

And that "ten percent for the Big Guy" thing was surely just a reference to a promo-code discount at Amazon.

Russian disinformation should remain beneath the notice of respectable journalists, except to summarily dismiss it as such.

You should defer to their wisdom and trust them to tell you if there's any possible corruption afoot - and if they don't, then ipso facto you can just reflexively dismiss the matter and move on ...
 
Last edited:
What corruption?

I haven't seen any investigative reporting by any respectable journalists about any corruption, or even any possibility of corruption.

And why should there be any, anyway?

After all, Hunter Biden never actually had a desk in the White House. How could a [Vice] President possibly be involved in his son's possible corruption if his son doesn't even have a desk in the White House? That's just silly! (And a nameplate, too! He would certainly need some kind of official nameplate for his desk, with some kind of official title engraved on it. I mean, come on! How else can you do corruption?)

And "ten percent for the Big Guy" was surely just a reference to a promo-code discount at Amazon.

Russian disinformation should remain beneath the notice of respectable journalists, except to summarily dismiss it as such.

You should defer to their wisdom and trust them to tell you if there's any corruption afoot - and if they don't, then you can ipso facto just dismiss the possibility and move on ...

Thank you, comrade, for correcting my wrongthink. I thought for a moment someone might be stupid. But of course, His Grace the Count of Oceania could never be that. He's entirely to official to be stupid.

 
Last edited:
Seems pretty par for the course if you ask me. How early in Trump's presidency did you think that he should have been impeached? January 2016?



On a serious note though, what I've read seems to indicate that it was an entirely a money making scheme of Hunter's. What I said since the whole Hunter stuff came out is that I don't particularly think that politicians should be blamed for the bad actions of their family unless they're actively involved. My issue with Trump's influence peddling is that his children were actively involved in the decisions of government and were themselves officials of the United States government.

My answer would be completely different if Biden gave Hunter an office in the White House.

Did you watch the same video? Because it implicates Joe Biden in Hunter's schemes. I think you're just being dishonest and obtuse. In other words your normal self.
 
Back
Top