human evolution's missing link found (95% complete fossil, w/ pics)

[Pennsylvania]

What does God killing children have to do with the scientific facts agreeing with the Bible?

Very little as far as the thread topic is concerned. It was an off-topic post at the most (sue me). However, I was interested in the answer for reasons of my own. Therefore, the classification of my post as a red herring remains an invalid one.

 

[LATruth]

I claimed nothing besides the obvious that there are many more scientific facts in support of the Bible, than there ever were surrounding the theory of evolution.

List them, until then I am calling your statement bullshit. I will concede and apologize when standed corrected. "youtube it or it didn't happen"

I guarantee I can cite more scientific data on evolution. GUARANTEE.

 

[Dr.3D]

This is an UNWINNABLE argument, we can debate this until the cows grow wings and never discover common ground. Losing is impossible. So is winning.

Well, in the event of cows growing wings, that might lend some support to the theory of evolution.

 

[LATruth]

Well, in the event of cows growing wings, that might lend some support to the theory of evolution.

rofl

 

[LibertyEagle]

List them, until then I am calling your statement bullshit. I will concede and apologize when standed corrected. "youtube it or it didn't happen"

I guarantee I can cite more scientific data on evolution. GUARANTEE.

Then do it. But, we're not talking about "scientific data"; we're talking about scientific FACTS. Got any? Because thus far, all I have heard are hypotheses and theories presented as if they were facts. They aren't.

 

[LATruth]

Then do it. But, we're not talking about "scientific data"; we're talking about scientific FACTS. Got any? Because thus far, all I have heard are hypotheses and theories presented as if they were facts. They aren't.

I'm not the one with something to prove, as far as I'm concerned the burden of proof is on religion, due to the fact that they are the ones imposing rules on society.

Fossil records, not facts? Lucy? DNA?

But turning rivers into blood and resurrection is?

 

[Dr.3D]

I'm not the one with something to prove, as far as I'm concerned the burden of proof is on religion, due to the fact that they are the ones imposing rules on society.

Fossil records, not facts? Lucy? DNA?

But turning rivers into blood and resurrection is?

And those who would require a child to undergo chemo therapy against his will are not imposing rules?

 

[LibertyEagle]

You've got a monkey. Proves nothing. lol. And now a reptile.

The Bible is filled with historical facts. Yes, some things are open to interpretation and I think it's those things that make some people go apeshit.

In the end, this discussion does nothing to further liberty.

 

[LATruth]

And those who would require a child to undergo chemo therapy against his will are not imposing rules?

Unrelated argument, and also an event I don't agree with. It's not a view of the majority.

This has no place here, please show me the correlation.

 

[Mosheh Thezion]

I guess... it is a waste of time... to try and debate it..

Since the otherside... chooses to run away like children.

Oh well.... The only thing to discuss is the science.... but the other side of this arguement, only wants to talk about religion, and how it is bad... or something.


So.. yeah.... it is a waste of time, to argue with people, who can't... ... ha.

I could start talking about it, but I posted the links, and that should be enough.

I dont want to be pushy.

-MEMAT

 

[LATruth]

You've got a monkey. Proves nothing. lol. And now a reptile.

The Bible is filled with historical facts. Yes, some things are open to interpretation and I think it's those things that make some people go apeshit.

In the end, this discussion does nothing to further liberty.

Yes I have a monkey and a lizard, you don't have resurrection, rivers of blood, bread that turns to fish, water that turns to wine, bushes that speak, seas that part, stone tablets with rules... I could make your list as long as the post limit.

 

[Theocrat]

For Your Information

Very little as far as the thread topic is concerned. It was an off-topic post at the most (sue me). However, I was interested in the answer for reasons of my own. Therefore, the classification of my post as a red herring remains an invalid one.

Not only does God kill children (as a judgment upon them, their parents, and their nation for their sins), but He also killed humans and animals with a worldwide flood for their sins. The evidence of that global judgment is the fossils we find all over the world, which testify that God hates sin that much. Fossils do not show that humans came from animals, but that is the belief system of evolutionists.

 

[Pennsylvania]

Not only does God kill children (as a judgment upon them, their parents, and their nation for their sins), but He also killed humans and animals with a worldwide flood for the sins. The evidence of that global judgment is the fossils we find all over the world, which testify that God hates sin that much. Fossils do not show that humans came from animals, and that is the belief system of evolutionists.

Theo, come to the chat.

 

[Dr.3D]

Unrelated argument, and also an event I don't agree with. It's not a view of the majority.

This has no place here, please show me the correlation.

Well, the correlation is, those are the scientific people in the medical profession who have decided it's for the child's own good he should follow their belief that he would be better off if he went through chemo therapy.

 

[LATruth]

Well, the correlation is, those are the scientific people in the medical profession who have decided it's for the child's own good he should follow their belief that he would be better off if he went through chemo therapy.

I know that this is not a view of the scientific majority. I bet there are MANY Dr.s saying WTF about this issue.

 

[Dr.3D]

I know that this is not a view of the scientific majority. I bet there are MANY Dr.s saying WTF about this issue.

Just like Dr. Paul saying he believes in creation?
Humm... perhaps he is in the minority.

 

[LATruth]

Just like Dr. Paul saying he believes in creation?
Humm... perhaps he is in the minority.

I disagree with Dr. Paul as well on this issue. I am not going to jump ship on every issue do to RP saying it's so. Neither should you, think for yourself. Question authority. he can believe in creation if he chooses, I would have this same discussion with him if I could.

 

[Dr.3D]

I disagree with Dr. Paul as well on this issue. I am not going to jump ship on every issue do to RP saying it's so. Neither should you, think for yourself. Question authority. he can believe in creation if he chooses, I would have this same discussion with him if I could.

This is why we shouldn't listen to those who would put down our religious beliefs.
We should think for ourselves.

 

[LATruth]

This is why we shouldn't listen to those who would put down our religious beliefs.
We should think for ourselves.

I'm not putting down your belief because it's fun, it's when those beliefs influence policy that polices the whole I have a problem. I'm not telling you what to believe.

Fossils are fact, species are fact, differences amongst species over time are fact, therefor I deduce evolution/natural selection is also a fact. When someone counters tangible items (fossils and dna etc) that seem to corroborate the claim of evolution with a religious faith based belief it seems (to me) highly illogical.

And I argue the point to try to understand the steps and logic the opposing side takes to IMO close the door and remain faithful to a book with incredible claims no one can reproduce. I can't seem to wrap my mind around it. I'm not trying to be an ass. After all I would love an afterlife. I just don't believe it exists.

 

[Dr.3D]

I'm not putting down your belief because it's fun, it's when those beliefs influence policy that polices the whole I have a problem. I'm not telling you what to believe.

Fossils are fact, species are fact, differences amongst species over time are fact, therefor I deduce evolution/natural selection is also a fact. When someone counters tangible items (fossils and dna etc) that seem to corroborate the claim of evolution with a religious faith based belief it seems (to me) highly illogical.

And I argue the point to try to understand the steps and logic the opposing side takes to IMO close the door and remain faithful to a book with incredible claims no one can reproduce. I can't seem to wrap my mind around it. I'm not trying to be an ass. After all I would love an afterlife. I just don't believe it exists.

Okay, carry on.... I just saw the phrases:

bedtime story about mystical beings

floating pens scribing on magical parchment.

The fact that people believe its the "word of god" when it was rewritten and changed 100's of times to heighten the powers that be's status is ridiculous

and saw them as an attack on Christianity.

To you it is a "bedtime story about mystical beings". I don't recall anything in the bible about mystical beings nor do I recall any mention of 'floating pens scribing on magical parchment." As for the scriptures having been "rewritten and changed 100's of times", there is evidence showing the the oldest writings found in the Dead Sea Scrolls, read nearly exactly as they do now except they are not in the English language. I have never been presented with any evidence the scriptures have been retouched in any way.

Edit: As for the New Testament scripture, there are many of the old copies around because they were mass produced by hand at the time. It is also interesting to note, they all agree as to the wording in each of them.