How they'll set Trump up to be be installed as dictator

[Invisible Man]

It’s 2024 & I dont know about that

I could be wrong. But I doubt it. Kamala didn't win a primary, and if she had tried to, she would have lost.

People may say they want to see a woman president. But they have subtle subliminal expectations that go against that. She can't be too feminine, because she won't come across as a leader. She can't be too masculine, because as a woman that will make her unlikable. Harris's voice is annoying. She sounds like a valley girl. That brings up associations that will cause people to prejudge her as a moron, and in Kamala's case this will be correct. Her laugh is annoying. Her background of getting her foot in the political door by having an affair with a powerful man is no secret, just like everybody always knew that Hillary would never have been a senator if she hadn't been married to Bill. Having her on the ticket was a drag for the Biden campaign, just like every other ticket in history that had a woman on it was harmed by doing so. Just like only a tiny percent of CEOs, governors, and world leaders are females.

People's ideologies may say they want more woman leaders. But their natural human instincts that guide their decisions on a guttural level say they don't. Even in feminist households, everybody knows by experience that when you want the kids to listen, dad's voice has an effect that mom's voice doesn't.

 

[Anti Federalist]

Most voters would prefer the president be a man. They may not say it out loud. But having a woman at the top of the ticket costs more votes than it gains.

From a CBS poll ending 2 Aug 2024

 

[Invisible Man]

From a CBS poll ending 2 Aug 2024

Like I said, they may say it. But it isn't true. And saying America is ready for one in the abstract isn't the same as saying they'll actually vote for a specific one in the real world. And even this stat doesn't bode well for Kamala. A full 32% of America are willing to admit in a poll that they don't even thing the country is ready for a black woman to be president, and that's not even when you take out all the people from the other 68% who don't really mean what they say.

If they asked if America is ready for a white man to be president, the response would only be confusion at the question, given the fact that 44.5 out of 45 presidents we've had so far have all been white men.

 

[Anti Federalist]

Like I said, they may say it. But it isn't true. And saying America is ready for one in the abstract isn't the same as saying they'll actually vote for a specific one in the real world. And even this stat doesn't bode well for Kamala. A full 32% of America are willing to admit in a poll that they don't even thing the country is ready for a black woman to be president, and that's not even when you take out all the people from the other 68% who don't really mean what they say.

If they asked if America is ready for a white man to be president, the response would only be confusion at the question, given the fact that 44.5 out of 45 presidents we've had so far have all been white men.

Well, we'll see soon, won't we?

 

[Occam's Banana]

Sounds like they're prepared to do anything to keep him out.

WTF does this mean?

THREAD: Using the 14th Amendment to throw Trump out of office

CLIP from SYSTEM UPDATE #311:

Top Dem Jamie Raskin Warned That Congress Will Ban Trump If He Wins Presidential Election
https://rumble.com/v59y4tw-top-dem-...ngress-will-ban-trump-if-he-wins-preside.html
{Glenn Greenwald | 06 August 2024}

​

 

[acptulsa]

Well, we'll see soon, won't we?

No, we won't.

Except for giving up on Biden's ability to keep being an adequate puppet until November and installing an insanely unpopular cackling hyena, we're pretty much going exactly where I said we were. Aren't we?

And the greatest example going on right now before our very eyes is Section 3 of the Fourteenth Amendment, which they’re just disappearing with a magic wand, as if it doesn’t exist, even though it could not be clearer what it’s stating. And so they want to kick it to Congress, so it’s going to be up to us on January 6, 2025, to tell the rampaging Trump mobs that he’s disqualified. And then we need bodyguards for everybody, and civil war conditions, all because the nine justices — not all of them, but these justices who have not many cases to look at every year, not that much work to do, a huge staff, great protection — simply do not want to do their job and interpret what the great Fourteenth Amendment means. - Jamie Raskin

 

[Anti Federalist]

No, we won't.

Except for giving up on Biden's ability to keep being an adequate puppet until November and installing an insanely unpopular cackling hyena, we're pretty much going exactly where I said we were. Aren't we?

Not that I can see.

Remember what I said earlier this year about no lawn signs being shown anywhere here in NH?

You know what I see popping up all over?

Harris signs.

The fix is in, it'll be Harris by a small margin.

 

[acptulsa]

The fix is in...

That, too, is part of the plan as I described it...

 

[Anti Federalist]

That, too, is part of the plan as I described it...

But I thought "the fix" was install to Trump?

 

[acptulsa]

But I thought "the fix" was install to Trump?

The fix is to get you to trade the Constitution to get Trump. They can't do that by handing him the election outright. Right?

 

[Anti Federalist]

The fix is to get you to trade the Constitution to get Trump. They can't do that by handing him the election outright. Right?

They just tried to kill him and came within a RCH of doing so, in an obvious hamfisted inside job attempt.

If that's their plan, how can I trade the constitution for a dead man?

 

[nobody's_hero]

They just tried to kill him and came within a RCH of doing so, in an obvious hamfisted inside job attempt.

If that's their plan, how can I trade the constitution for a dead man?

There's a lot of plot holes in the theory, TBH.

First and foremost is the implication that we aren't rapidly losing the constitution under Biden/Harris and somehow Trump is necessary to make that happen.

 

[devil21]

It’s 2024 & I dont know about that

And there's some old conspiracy theory that there's a rule that Presidents must take freemasonic oaths prior to being sworn in and freemasonry only officially recognizes men as masons. But that's probably crazy talk.

Not that I can see.

Remember what I said earlier this year about no lawn signs being shown anywhere here in NH?

You know what I see popping up all over?

Harris signs.

The fix is in, it'll be Harris by a small margin.

Oh ye of little faith! One day of a media manufactured intro to a no name governor and you're already throwing in the towel?

 

[Swordsmyth]

There's a lot of plot holes in the theory, TBH.

First and foremost is the implication that we aren't rapidly losing the constitution under Biden/Harris and somehow Trump is necessary to make that happen.

It's the weekend at Bernie's theory.

Trump is not going to trash the Constitution, and he wouldn't be needed in order to do so.
There is an overkill level of proof they don't want him and that they want to trash the Constitution using Kamala.

Fortunately, Trump is going to win and Kamala has no chance, that's why they tried to kill him.

 

[acptulsa]

They just tried to kill him and came within a RCH of doing so, in an obvious hamfisted inside job attempt.

If that's their plan, how can I trade the constitution for a dead man?

Except for the New York Times reporter in the front row running a shutter speed of 1/8000 of a second. Nothing ham-fisted about that photograph. Where was his ear hit? The bandage is off. Where's the hole?

Just because a conspiracy theory is favored by Democrats doesn't make it impossible. What's impossible is Swordy's theory that his right ear appears perfectly normal already because somebody invented a Star Trek dermal regenerator.

Hamfisted like people trying harder to get caught than to succeed. A second shooter on the water tower and nothing but a miraculous ear nick that didn't even leave a chunk missing?

There's a lot of plot holes in the theory, TBH.

First and foremost is the implication that we aren't rapidly losing the constitution under Biden/Harris and somehow Trump is necessary to make that happen.

Ever get sick of mowing the grass one narrow strip at a time and get tempted to just drop a Roundup bomb on the whole thing?

Maybe you aren't as psycho as they are. In fact, I know you aren't.

Why don't you two try believing them when they tell you? Especially this gaffe machine -- I guess y'all were sleeping when he literally mumbled that inflation isn't a bug, it's a feature, a desired effect triggered (by both of the last two presidents) on purpose. You never know what useful information will come out of that senile mouth.

www.x.com/nicksortor/status/1821297280995258537

 

[Anti Federalist]

Except for the New York Times reporter in the front row running a shutter speed of 1/8000 of a second. Where was his ear hit? The bandage is off. Where's the hole? Just because a conspiracy theory is favored by Democrats doesn't make it impossible.

Hamfisted like people trying harder to get caught than to succeed. A second shooter on the water tower and nothing but a miraculous ear nick that didn't even leave a chunk missing?

So you're saying he was not shot?

 

[acptulsa]

Fortunately, Trump is going to win and Kamala has no chance...

Not in a fair election. She was hand selected for her ability to alienate everyone.

...that's why they tried to kill him.

How quickly Republicans jump to the conclusion that a cigar is just a cigar -- and cling to that desperately -- when it suits your worldview to do so.

So you're saying he was not shot?

No. So you're saying he certainly was? Guaranteeing it?

Psyops are con jobs. They completely depend on people not weighing evidence by checking its validity, but by seeing how well it fits their worldview, and accepting or rejecting it because of that.

 

[acptulsa]

It's the weekend at Bernie's theory.

Anyone who can read the OP without their lips moving can see this is a lie. AF completely misunderstood it, but didn't misunderstand it this thoroughly.

You really can't even see evidence that there are problems with your worldview, can you?

 

[Swordsmyth]

Except for the New York Times reporter in the front row running a shutter speed of 1/8000 of a second. Nothing ham-fisted about that photograph. Where was his ear hit? The bandage is off. Where's the hole?

Just because a conspiracy theory is favored by Democrats doesn't make it impossible. What's impossible is Swordy's theory that his right ear appears perfectly normal already because somebody invented a Star Trek dermal regenerator.

Hamfisted like people trying harder to get caught than to succeed. A second shooter on the water tower and nothing but a miraculous ear nick that didn't even leave a chunk missing?



Ever get sick of mowing the grass one narrow strip at a time and get tempted to just drop a Roundup bomb on the whole thing?

Maybe you aren't as psycho as they are. In fact, I know you aren't.

Why don't you two try believing them when they tell you? Especially this gaffe machine -- I guess y'all were sleeping when he literally mumbled that inflation isn't a bug, it's a feature, a desired effect triggered (by both of the last two presidents) on purpose. You never know what useful information will come out of that senile mouth.

www.x.com/nicksortor/status/1821297280995258537

 

[Swordsmyth]

Anyone who can read the OP without their lips moving can see this is a lie. AF completely misunderstood it, but didn't misunderstand it this thoroughly.

You really can't even see evidence that there are problems with your worldview, can you?

Your theory was obviously false to start, now it's completely dead and lifeless but you continue to parade it around to serve your agenda.