How many of you understand the USA just elected a (potentially) brutal dictator?

[thoughtomator]

Nope. I could see how useful a guy like Trump could be to our masters. He can discredit "capitalism", "anti-establishment-ism", and "non-interventionism" all at once. Then it will be generations before Boobus would consider any of these things again.

Fatalism never secured a single liberty for anyone.

If we take that line of thought to its logical conclusion, there's no point in doing anything ever because the puppet masters are pulling every string and their reach is absolute.

That line of thinking is borderline suicidal... or maybe over the border.

 

[Occam's Banana]

There are several reasons why someone would vote for Trump. I don't hate Trump voters, and it's not Trump voters that I necessarily call names. It's Trump fanatics that tell me that he is deceiving the establishment and is really a champion for liberty and I'm a leftist, socialist, globalist, cuck piece of shit for not submitting myself to his rule.

THIS ^^^. Well stated.

 

[seapilot]

Thought this was an interesting read.

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-11-23/order-out-chaos-defeat-left-comes-cost

 

[LibertyEagle]

No. Thank you. I think it is time for you, as site owner, to engage with the members as you have just done. Transparency is a big thing in the liberty movement. Is it not?

Do you think the proliferation of Trump supporters to your site increases your sites goal? Do you instruct your moderators to..moderate? Are you happy with the way this forum has progressed since Trump became a candidate, a nominee, and now the next president?

Honestly, it's time for you to take action, in what ever form you choose, but TAKE action.

Trump was vetted and jettisoned. His sycophants prance upon your property until those of us that have been here since the beginning get tired of it. We bite back. And we get banned for doing it.

You can't call this place Ron Paul Forums, and allow this $#@! to continue.

Many many members have pointed out that it is abhorrent, sullies the name of Ron Paul and gives the wrong impression to his ideals.

Time to $#@! or get off the pot. Is you is, or is you ain't?
[MENTION=2]Bryan[/MENTION]

Kind of how promoting Gary Johnson and Bill Weld on this site was abhorrent and gave the wrong impression of Ron Paul and his ideals? Like that?

 

[LibertyEagle]

Fatalism never secured a single liberty for anyone.

If we take that line of thought to its logical conclusion, there's no point in doing anything ever because the puppet masters are pulling every string and their reach is absolute.

That line of thinking is borderline suicidal... or maybe over the border.

What? Did he get banned for this? Why?

 

[scm]

There are several reasons why someone would vote for Trump. I don't hate Trump voters, and it's not Trump voters that I necessarily call names. It's Trump fanatics that tell me that he is deceiving the establishment and is really a champion for liberty and I'm a leftist, socialist, globalist, cuck piece of shit for not submitting myself to his rule. I don't have time for that.

I do think his election sent a message to the rulers. A message that they suspected was coming. I just think the wrong guy was chosen to represent this outrage against the establishment, and chances are very good that wasting this message on this guy will kill that sentiment in the future.

I agree with everything you said except this election didn't send a message to the rulers, the rulers sent a message to everyone this election. He was hand picked for this role for the exact reason (plus more) that you say.

 

[ChristianAnarchist]

There are several reasons why someone would vote for Trump. I don't hate Trump voters, and it's not Trump voters that I necessarily call names. It's Trump fanatics that tell me that he is deceiving the establishment and is really a champion for liberty and I'm a leftist, socialist, globalist, cuck piece of $#@! for not submitting myself to his rule. I don't have time for that.

Absolutely right. I won't submit to ANYONE's rule. I don't want a "ruler". I have no need for a "ruler". Used to be (seems like a thousand years ago) they were called "servants". Guess they didn't like to "serve" and would much more like to "rule".

Foulk all those who wish to "RULE"!!!

 

[bubbleboy]

Awesome. He must be good. hell yea

 

[Superfluous Man]

I'll tell you who has been wrong. All those on this forum who said over and over again that Trump didn't stand a chance, that he was just running to help Hillary get elected, those that called those of us planning to vote for him all kinds of colorful names.

They were right about the colorful names.

 

[Son_of_Liberty90]

Hey guys lets predict the absolute worst before anything happens thus boosting our morale in a weird way that's a great idea.

It's not even a done deal yet with all of these protests, potential rogue electors, recount BS and now allegations of Russian intervention in the elections on Trump's behalf.

Not to mention, the white house doing a 180 now questioning the election results after they were respectful and acknowledged the winning candidate.

It's absolute madness.