How many delegates does Romney actually have?

[movingstone]

I forgot to add North Dakota (20) and CO + WY= 39 instead of 35 to Romney, It should be then 646 to 713
http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showthread.php?372013-Running-Thread-Delegate-Counts

I don't really understand Dr. Paul delegate math though. Correct me, if I am wrong.
26 (Hard) + 26 (ND, MN, WY, and CO) +1 super delegate = 53 to 64

Sources are from the links in my previous posts. The thing that really is worrying is that according to wikipedia, there are only 338 delegates can be obtained via the caucus strategy not counting North Dakota). Of which, Romney won 39 already. This meant what decided this election are the remaining primary states and not the caucus process. Dr. Paul must start winning majority of the remaining primaries. I can be wrong up course.

 

[Liberty74]

How much are you getting paid by Romney to post here?

He's not a conservative & he'll lose just McCain did last time; he's pretty much a clone of Obama so why wouldn't the conservaties just sit this election out or better vote for Obama as protest-votes so that GOP-establishment starts thinking about CONSERVATISM again

Because the hatred of Obama runs very deep. Even the so called conservatives I work with who have been anti Mitt are all of a sudden up his ass because he is turning out to be the nominee. Obama's strong unfavorables are extremely high. And with people stuck in the matrix, the two party criminal system, they will vote for one or the other guy. I will repeat again, for the mass voters, truth is irrelevant in politics. It's all about perception. It's one of the reasons why I have always advocated Ron running Indy - to snap people out of their political trance and to offer the people a real choice. Not Ron, then somebody else then.

 

[69360]

Because the hatred of Obama runs very deep. Even the so called conservatives I work with who have been anti Mitt are all of a sudden up his ass because he is turning out to be the nominee. Obama's strong unfavorables are extremely high. And with people stuck in the matrix, the two party criminal system, they will vote for one or the other guy. I will repeat again, for the mass voters, truth is irrelevant in politics. It's all about perception. It's one of the reasons why I have always advocated Ron running Indy - to snap people out of their political trance and to offer the people a real choice. Not Ron, then somebody else then.

Romney's unfavorables are even higher. They are the worst in at least the last 20 years for a presumptive nominee.

 

[Liberty74]

Romney's unfavorables are even higher. They are the worst in at least the last 20 years for a presumptive nominee.

Mitt's unfavorables are not higher than Barack's. According to CNN bogus polls, yes, who always are wrong because they always over sample Democrats like NBC does to promote their propaganda. Unfavorables and strong unfavorables are very two different stats as well. Rasmussen reports both. Obama's strong unfavorables are extremely high.

The latest Gallup has Mitt 48 and Obama 43 in a head to head match up.

Mitt is acting like the nominee and doing what Ron should be doing and that is attacking the President, attacking the media, etc. Yet, Ron never does which makes me wonder. Heck Ron won't even attack Mitt.

This idea that Mitt can't beat Obama is a myth being circulated by RPF. Obama has nothing going for him except the stock market. Every economic marker is still bad.

 

[69360]

According to CNN bogus polls, yes, who always are wrong because they always over sample Democrats like NBC does to promote their propaganda.

Haven't you learned doubing the polls gets you nowhere by now?