Zippyjuan
Banned
- Joined
- Feb 5, 2008
- Messages
- 49,008
It is fine for entertainment value- for a source of facts about what is going on the world it is terrible.
From the Infowars piece:
There were no walled cities even suggested.
From the article linked to in the InfoWar piece:
Everything from Infowars is presented as part of some big plan to control the world and either lock up or kill everybody. Do they actually run any positive articles?
From the Infowars piece:
Insisting the world’s population be locked up within the confounds of mega-cities, the elite realizes that if the herd is to be properly controlled walls are needed- thick walls, and by constructing these walls, making the masses go this or that way will be made easier..
People who know anything about history know that the creation of mega-cities in which the masses may be rounded up and enclosed, is identical to the Nazi principle of the “ghetto” as a means of managing the masses. Every student of history may also know what happens to those masses shortly after.
There were no walled cities even suggested.
From the article linked to in the InfoWar piece:
Fragkias told msnbc.com that "the answer [to urban sprawl] is denser cities."
"The main message is we are not going to get away with cities like Phoenix or cities like Los Angeles," he said. "These are the typical cities of the single-family house, with a huge lot and huge highways that connect various areas of the cities because there is no way you can have an efficient or cheap enough mass transit system to support them."
Instead, densely populated areas such as Singapore or Manhattan -- but not New York City's surrounding urban sprawl -- provided possible models for the future. "If cities can develop in height rather than in width that would be much more preferable and environmentally not as harmful," Fragkias said.
Everything from Infowars is presented as part of some big plan to control the world and either lock up or kill everybody. Do they actually run any positive articles?