how many are aware of UN agenda 21?

Yeah, I can't figure out why the guy is here, and why his username is "onlyrp". According to every post of his I've read, everything is okay, there are no problems with what the government does, the size of it, what its involved in, etc.

I'm thinking he should head over to Mitt Romney Forums and sign up as, "onlymr".

Yeah. Of all the people here I consider to be trolls he is one of the most blatant examples of a user that should be perma banned.
 
Four words. Perfect. And if you ain't gonna research it yourself, that's all you really need to know.

THEY WANT YOU DEAD

I could have added "and they want you to pay for your death" and "they want to profit from your death" also but was afraid Lishy didn't have time for all that. Pretty much sums up most of the globalists covert depopulation programs eh?
 
Yeah, I can't figure out why the guy is here, and why his username is "onlyrp". According to every post of his I've read, everything is okay, there are no problems with what the government does, the size of it, what its involved in, etc.

I'm thinking he should head over to Mitt Romney Forums and sign up as, "onlymr".

Not everything is OK, but the only other option isn't "all government is bad, or all government was acceptable until the federal reserve".
 
I could have added "and they want you to pay for your death" and "they want to profit from your death" also but was afraid Lishy didn't have time for all that. Pretty much sums up most of the globalists covert depopulation programs eh?

If depopulation is bad, then overpopulation must be great.
 
Not everything is OK, but the only other option isn't "all government is bad, or all government was acceptable until the federal reserve".

It is perhaps a necessary evil,, but it is still evil.
And as such, should be limited. Seriously Limited.
 
Hear about it, still have not had my question answered WTF it does!?

I learned of UN Agenda 21 from Glenn Beck and that led me to Ron Paul.

If a person believes the "green agenda" is all good -- they need to do some homework!

THIS is why it's important we all work on our local level: city councils, etc.

All you ever wanted to learn about Agenda 21 can be learned from Democrats (many of them are fighting it as well):
Lots of false stories circulate, but these are true (as far as I can tell) http://www.democratsagainstunagenda21.com/
 
I got no time. Explain it to me short and comprehensive please?

My teacher summed it up pretty well when he made the claim that the world would be a better place if we all lived in New York Cities because in big cities the pollution per person is lower. Democrats against Agenda 21 do a good job explaining the details.
 
Im so sick of this shit. Seriously how much money does a person need? How much power? Why can't they just let people live free? Would it be so bad? I live my life, I make my decisions, i reap the rewards of feel the consequences. I don't aggress against you, you don't aggress against me and every friday we smoke fatties in the park... What would be so wrong with that? Oh, is the population approaching unsustainable levels? How could we know when we still pay farmers not to farm? Ron Paul for Sainthood. Peace.
 
Thank you so much for starting this thread. This agenda is huge and basically means world takeover in the name of conserving regions of the environment. It was started in '92 and led by Pres Bush. It is implemented locally by the ICLEI which works with hundreds of local environmental and parks depts, many of whom are unaware of the larger picture they are taking part in. The UN already owns 12% of the worlds land, including parts of the US, esp in Washington and Oregon states. Eventually, and likely sooner than we think as they are almost prepared to move into the next phase after their G-20 meeting and the earth summit which follows shortly thereafter, people will be relocated to human corridors within their respective nation. They will be 'stacked and packed' in tiny apartments to save most of the land for conservation and animal restoration. All of which is BS. They just want to own the world. The UN has been a socialist and communist front from the beginning. Alger Hiss, the convicted Soviet Spy, lost his position as the first UN Secretary-General when his espionage was discovered. He also helped to represent the US at the San Francisco convention forming the UN in 45 and he admitted to Congress that he took part in the actual writing of the UN Charter as the US representative. And, yes, they do want you dead. Depopulation is an implied ingredient in all of this. You can happily read Agenda 21 online and all of its environmental and social injustice propaganda. It is a couple of hundred pages long, not bad. The real scary stuff is in the 3,000 page implementation manual.
There are many videos on youtube about this. Please look it up and help Ron Paul get us out of the UN.
 
Agenda 21 is the conspiracy theory behind all conspiracy theories. the problem is is that it is not a theory. it is established fact and UN policy ready for everyone to read and study on the Internet. That is what makes it so scary. they are doing it right in front of everyone's face. David Rockefeller is behind much of this agenda and he was instrumental, through the Rockefeller Foundation, in funding the establishment of the UN back in the 40s.

"Some even believe we (the Rockefeller family) are part of a secret cabal working against the best interests of the United States, characterizing my family and me as 'internationalists' and of conspiring with others around the world to build a more integrated global political and economic structure---one world, if you will. If that's the charge, I stand guilty, and I am proud of it."

--David Rockefeller, Memoirs, page 405

"Whatever the price of the Chinese Revolution, it has obviously succeeded not only in producing more efficient and dedicated administration, but also in fostering high morale and community of purpose. The social experiment in China under Chairman Mao's leadership is one of the most important and successful in human history."

---David Rockefeller, statement about Mao Tse-tung in The New York Times, August 10, 1973
 
Thank you so much for starting this thread. This agenda is huge and basically means world takeover in the name of conserving regions of the environment. It was started in '92 and led by Pres Bush.

Actually, it was started much earlier than that. This is just the latest installment.

This has been ongoing for over 100 years,, and was promoted by Fabian Socialists at the turn of the last century.
 
What were the other 20 previous agendas? Just curious.
 
Last edited:


An excellent example of Alex Jones taking a story and giving it a fear- mongering spin. If one reads the actual report, it says that it might be benificial in terms of resource usage to construct cities with greater densities rather than spreading them out over larger areas. The headline, which features the phrase "Population Lockup" gives the scary impression of giant walled cities surrounded by police and/ or military to keep people from being able to go in and out of them- a massive prison or gulag- which is not at all what the piece even suggests. More skyscrapers are not gulags although it would be technically possible to use them in that way.
 
Zippy, you are an asset, I like the fact you put government studies up. But, damn. The government is not going to admit wrong doing. Never. And independent studies are worth more than the "official" studies given the propensity of government lies. Especially when said studies are funded by the same industries in question. If you don't think washington is out of control just say so. I deliberately left washington in low caps, they no longer represent any american.
 
An excellent example of Alex Jones taking a story and giving it a fear- mongering spin. If one reads the actual report, it says that it might be benificial in terms of resource usage to construct cities with greater densities rather than spreading them out over larger areas. The headline, which features the phrase "Population Lockup" gives the scary impression of giant walled cities surrounded by police and/ or military to keep people from being able to go in and out of them- a massive prison or gulag- which is not at all what the piece even suggests. More skyscrapers are not gulags although it would be technically possible to use them in that way.

It got your attention didn't it?
 
Back
Top