How do Ron Paul supporters feel about homosexuality?

Is homosexuality a choice?

  • Yes

    Votes: 41 40.2%
  • No

    Votes: 61 59.8%

  • Total voters
    102
Take this with a grain of salt. I passed Biology only because the tests were multiple choice (thank god for NCLB!), but even recessive traits would be fairly common in families to have gay children, right? In other words, if someone is gay, shouldn't the person's ancestry be freckled with homosexuality if it were genetic?

closet butt pirates
 
I don't think many of the originalists here would like that you're calling the Founders gay.

tee hee!:D

back then gay meant happy. so, that means they died with a lot of change in their pants if you know what I mean like LOL LOL LOL
 
gay.elf.jpg

Bah! That AIN'T Legolas.

Michael_Kaluta_-_Legolas_Draws_the_Bow_of_Galadriel.jpg


Christopher Tolkien recounts that his father wrote the following "wrathful" comment protesting against a "pretty" or "ladylike" depiction of Legolas:

"He was tall as a young tree, lithe, immensely strong, able swiftly to draw a great war-bow and shoot down a Nazgûl, endowed with the tremendous vitality of Elvish bodies, so hard and resistant to hurt that he went only in light shoes over rock or through snow, the most tireless of all the Fellowship."
The Book of Lost Tales Part 2

People who think Legolas is effeminate are gay!
 
Last edited:
Does it really matter whether I believe someone is straight or gay due to their environment, genetics or simple choice?

I don't think so.

Even if being gay is a choice, that's no reason not to give them the same rights as those who are born into or choose heterosexuality. I don't get what the end goal of the "choice" vs. "genetics" debate is. Either way, you're still stripping another human being of their rights based solely on who they choose to have sex with.

I've met people who I would guess were gay from birth, I've also met people who I think were influenced by their environment. I'm not an expert on it, nor do I care to be.
 
Does it really matter whether I believe someone is straight or gay due to their environment, genetics or simple choice?

I don't think so.

Even if being gay is a choice, that's no reason not to give them the same rights as those who are born into or choose heterosexuality. I don't get what the end goal of the "choice" vs. "genetics" debate is. Either way, you're still stripping another human being of their rights based solely on who they choose to have sex with.

I've met people who I would guess were gay from birth, I've also met people who I think were influenced by their environment. I'm not an expert on it, nor do I care to be.

Rights should be for each individual. Not based on any group affiliation.
 
i'm sure these types of scenarios occur more often than reported. I'm currently reading "The Rise and Fall of the Third Reich" and I was surprised to learn that there were bunches (not bunchies) of gays in the S.S. Like actual troopers. The really off the wall type of people. I think that when you live in a society that says you are "wrong" then some may compensate by over doing it in the other direction. To prove their non-gayness or to -poke out your eye if it causes you to sin- .... kinda thing.

This was imprinted upon the SS through the Thule Society, but it was the desired orientation for the SS: ultimate warrior; must understand that it is based upon the Platonic era Greeks--the effeminate were disdained/exterminated in the camps. The influence of the occult-aspects [hidden and difficult to see] of Greek homosexuals on Nazi culture was best explained by contemporary German psychoanalyst, Wilhelm Reich in his 1933 classic, The Mass Psychology of Fascism [put this book on your reading list]:

Among the ancient Greeks, whose written history does not begin until patriarchy has reached a state of full development, we find the following sexual organization: male supremacy...and along with this the wives leading an enslaved and wretched existence and figuring solely as birth machines. The male supremacy of the Platonic era is entirely homosexual...The same principle governs the fascist ideology of the male strata of Nazi leaders (Bluher, Roehm, etc.). For the fascists, therefore, the return of natural sexuality is viewed as a sign of decadence, lasciviousness, lechery, and sexual filth...the fascists ...affirm the most severe form of patriarchy and actually reactivate the sexual life of the Platonic era in their familial form of living...Rosenberg and Bluher [the leading Nazi ideologists] recognize the state solely as a male state organized on a homosexual basis."

Extremely effective, like the male-supremacy Spartan homosexual military cult as well, not addressed per se in '300', but their results/lethality speak across time.
 
This was imprinted upon the SS through the Thule Society, but it was the desired orientation for the SS: ultimate warrior; must understand that it is based upon the Platonic era Greeks--the effeminate were disdained/exterminated in the camps. The influence of the occult-aspects [hidden and difficult to see] of Greek homosexuals on Nazi culture was best explained by contemporary German psychoanalyst, Wilhelm Reich in his 1933 classic, The Mass Psychology of Fascism [put this book on your reading list]:



Extremely effective, like the male-supremacy Spartan homosexual military cult as well, not addressed per se in '300', but their results/lethality speak across time.

nice! --added
 
Back
Top