stereotype much?hit up barbershops with taxfree tips slim jims

Have a money bomb in honor of MLK's birthday.
I disagree with you, but mainly on the basis that Collectivism is precisely what Ron Paul is against and I happen to agree with that. Every American needs to be treated as an individual.
Yes, it is how marketing works-divide and conquer mentality, just like politicians and the rest of government. The bokk "The Red Web" explores how this all began in the early part of the century as with unions. Divide and conquer is what the other candidates do and is the reason they must think about their responses. Dr. Paul simply responds with honesty. I believe as Dr. Paul believes that most Americans appreciate honesty more than pandering and are intelligent enough to know the difference.
Thnking people, regardless of which group into which you wish to lump them, will always think for themselves and that is a great part of Dr. Paul's message. To go against that would be pandering to groupism and rejecting Dr. Paul's philosophy.
He, in his speeches, says and does nothing different to attract a particular group. He never flip-flops and that is the danger of trying to appeal to special groups of any kind.
So personally, I believe it is detrimental to massage the message for that purpose. It is absolutely that the message stand on its own.
The fact is that blacks vote in a block. The last presidential election showed that when 90% of the black vote went to Kerry. I think that getting them to switch is something you might be able to do for a second term, but they are too firmly entrenched in their voting habits to change it with 11 months remaining, better to concetrate on those who've bever voted or who have dropped out of the process.
And since white males are the single largest voting block, why would you be so dismissive of them in order to pander to a group that is unlikely to switch party affiliation?
Have a money bomb in honor of MLK's birthday. Even for all the good he did, he was still a communist, so maybe not the best match for Ron Paul.


The fact is that blacks vote in a block. The last presidential election showed that when 90% of the black vote went to Kerry. I think that getting them to switch is something you might be able to do for a second term, but they are too firmly entrenched in their voting habits to change it with 11 months remaining, better to concetrate on those who've bever voted or who have dropped out of the process.
And since white males are the single largest voting block, why would you be so dismissive of them in order to pander to a group that is unlikely to switch party affiliation?
Have a money bomb in honor of MLK's birthday. Even for all the good he did, he was still a communist, so maybe not the best match for Ron Paul.