House delivers for AIPAC, 410-1, passing Israel as ‘strategic partner’ bill

Joined
Mar 17, 2013
Messages
28,575
House delivers for AIPAC, 410-1, passing Israel as ‘strategic partner’ bill

While Christian zionist argue that God blesses those who stand with Israel, how do they explain election of Obama?

Asking them what caused 9/11 may be a futile as that question is never answered by them with logic.


House delivers for AIPAC, 410-1, passing Israel as ‘strategic partner’ bill


Alex Kane on March 5, 2014

The American-Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC) is bruised from the fight over Iran sanctions. But that didn’t stop the group from helping to push through legislation designating Israel as a “major strategic partner”–a first for any U.S. ally. The measure has been a major lobby priority since last year.
Today, the House of Representatives passed the U.S.-Israel Strategic Partnership Act by a 410-1 vote. The lone dissenting voice was Representative Thomas Massie (R-KY), a libertarian aligned with Senator Rand Paul. The Senate has not voted on their version of the bill yet, though it has strong support there, with 55 co-sponsors from both parties.

In addition to the “major strategic partner” designation, the bill allows for Israelis to travel to the U.S. without visas, though the State Department has to certify that Israel meets the requirements for the visa-waiver program. The legislation also calls for giving Israel advanced combat aircraft and military tanker transports. It was authored by the hawkish Florida Republican Ileana Ros-Lehtinen.
Rep. Thomas Massie, R-Ky, official portrait

“Israel has…never been as strong as it is now. Think of Israel’s economic dynamism, its entrepreneurial spirit, innovative culture, and you get a better sense of why there is so strong a bond between the United States and Israel,” said Rep. Ed Royce (D-CA), the chairman of the House Foreign Affairs Committee, which passed the legislation in late January. “It’s this dynamic economy and society that are building blocks for Israel’s Qualitative Military Edge and its relationship with the U.S. The U.S. benefits when Israel is strong. This legislation stands by our values; stands by our interests; and stands by Israel.”
The liberal Zionist lobby group J Street applauded the bill’s passage.
The legislation had languished in Congress for a year. While it was a priority for AIPAC at last year’s conference, it was held up because of concerns that it would codify Israel’s discrimination against activists and Arab- and Palestinian-American travelers. Those concerns, pushed to the forefront by a coalition of groups, led to the stripping out of language that gave Israel a right to deny entry to travelers if they threatened the state’s security. The security pretext is a favored tool used by Israeli authorities to deny people entry.
The U.S.-Israel Strategic Partnership Act was one of the initiatives AIPAC members pushed for when lobbying Congress on Tuesday. AIPAC activists also asked elected officials to sign onto a pair of letters stressing that Congress should be informed of the nuclear negotiations with Iran. As the Jewish Telegraphic Agency‘s Ron Kampeas reported, the letter for the House of Representatives, which J Street also backed, “does not include AIPAC’s previous calls for new and enhanced sanctions” and “does not include prescriptions for what the outcome of an agreement should look like.” The Senate letter, on the other hand, does include prescriptions for a deal with Iran, like the dismantling of enrichment capacity–a demand Iran has categorically rejected.
The fight over visa-waivers for Israelis may not be over. The US-Israel Strategic Partner bill now shifts to the Senate. Their version still contains a provision allowing Israel to deny entry to those who jeopardize the country’s security.

http://mondoweiss.net/2014/03/delivers-strategic-partner.html
 
Summary: S.462 — 113th Congress (2013-2014) 55 COSPONSORS
There is one summary for this bill. Bill summaries are authored by CRS.
Shown Here:
Introduced in Senate (03/05/2013)

United States-Israel Strategic Partnership Act of 2013 - Declares that Israel is a Major Strategic Partner of the United States.

Amends the Israel Enhanced Security Cooperation Act of 2012 to extend authority to: (1) make additions to foreign-based defense stockpiles, and (2) transfer certain obsolete or surplus Department of Defense (DOD) items to Israel.

Directs the Secretary of Commerce to take steps to make Israel eligible for the strategic trade authorization exception to the requirement for a license for the export, reexport, or in-country transfer of an item subject to certain export controls.

Authorizes the President to carry out U.S.-Israel cooperative activities and to provide assistance for cooperation in the fields of energy, water, homeland security, agriculture, and alternative fuel technologies.

Directs the President to report to Congress on the feasibility and advisability of establishing a joint United States-Israel Cyber Security Center.

Includes Israel in the visa waiver program when Israel satisfies such program's inclusion requirements and provides, subject to security concerns, reciprocal travel privileges for U.S. citizens.

Mike Lee and Ted Cruz are both cosponsors.
 
Nice to see who really owns this country.



Jews account for 50% to 60% of the total campaign monies that Democrats receive, according to political writers at various newspapers, among them The Washington Post and The Jerusalem Post. The Washington bureau chief of the Jewish Telegraphic Agency, a venerable international news agency supported by the world’s leading Jewish donors, believes that the figure could reach 67%

http://opinion.financialpost.com/2012/07/06/lawrence-solomon-obama-jewish-financiers/

They control Canada to, look at Harper recent trip to Israel.


Like Obama, Romney... does he also get AIPAC money?


[h=1]Stephen Harper’s Criticizing-Israel-Is-Anti-Semitic screed is exploded on CBC[/h] David Kattenburg on January 26, 2014 35


“We have witnessed, in recent years , the mutation of the old disease of anti-Semitism and the emergence of a new strain,” Canada’s 54 year-old Conservative Party leader — a staunch Zionist — told the rapt crowd. “We all know about the old anti-Semitism. It was crude and ignorant, and it led to the horrors of the death camps.”


“As once Jewish businesses were boycotted, some civil-society leaders today call for a boycott of Israel. On some campuses, intellectualized arguments against Israeli policies thinly mask the underlying realities, such as the shunning of Israeli academics and the harassment of Jewish students. Most disgracefully of all, some openly call Israel an apartheid state … It is nothing short of sickening.”

http://mondoweiss.net/2014/01/criticizing-semitic-exploded.html






Related


Netanyahu's brother-in-law: Obama is an anti-Semite


2013 was record year in new settlement construction, and 2014 rate is already higher

March 8, 2014
 
What benefit does the USA get by being such close allies with Israel?
 
They control Canada to, look at Harper recent trip to Israel.

ottawacitizen recently tried to dissect his policy stances on mideast:

The Harper Doctrine: Why Canada's prime minister supports Israel

Mark Kennedy More from Mark Kennedy
Published on: August 3, 2014

israel-canada-diplomacy.jpg
Prime Minister Stephen Harper touches the Western Wall, Judaism's holiest site in Jerusalem's old city on January 21, 2014.
AHMAD GHARABLI / GETTY Share Adjust Comment Print
On April 25, 2003, Stephen Harper appeared at a gathering of conservatives in Toronto brought together by the Civitas group.
He was leader of the Canadian Alliance party, a thankless job with little likelihood he could knock the governing Liberals from their perch.
But Harper’s speech that day, later reprinted in an essay, was remarkably prescient.
For anyone who cared to notice, it revealed how he would one day turn Canadian foreign policy on its head and, perhaps most notably, make this country the world’s most fervent ally of Israel.
Harper said Canada’s conservatives needed to “rediscover” the traditional conservatism of political philosopher Edmund Burke, which valued “social order,” custom and religious traditions.
“We need to rediscover Burkean conservatism because the emerging debates on foreign affairs should be fought on moral grounds,” said Harper.
“Current challenges in dealing with terrorism and its sponsors, as well as the emerging debate on the goals of the U.S. as the sole superpower, will be well served by conservative insights on preserving historic values and moral insights on right and wrong.”
Harper stressed that unlike the “modern left” — which had adopted a position of “moral neutrality” — conservatives understood “the notion that moral rules form a chain of right and duty, and that politics is a moral affair.”
He added: “We understand that the great geopolitical battles against modern tyrants and threats are battles over values.
“Conservatives must take the moral stand, with our allies, in favour of the fundamental values of our society, including democracy, free enterprise and individual freedom.”
Three years later, after an unanticipated meltdown of Liberal power, Harper was prime minister. He immediately launched an unshakeable foreign policy in support of Israel, beginning that summer when the Jewish state launched a military ground offensive into Lebanon to combat Hezbollah.
This summer, Harper is once again standing firmly by Israel — this time, as it responds to rocket fire from Hamas by pounding Gaza with air strikes and a ground offensive to punish the terrorist group and destroy a network of tunnels it has built to launch attacks into Israel.
More than 1,700 Palestinians, most of them non-combatant civilians, have been killed.
The United Nations Works and Relief Agency has accused Israel of committing a “serious violation” of international law after civilians were killed from the Israeli shelling of a UN designated building sheltering Palestinians, including many children.
By comparison, Harper has accused Hamas of being responsible for all the bloodshed.
Supporters praise him for his “clarity,” while critics castigate him for a simplistic approach to a complex issue. They say he has overlooked the aspirations of Palestinians who want their own homeland after decades of being mistreated by an “occupying power,” Israel.
What’s behind Harper’s thinking? What are its roots? Why is he so seemingly single-minded?
The questions perplex some Canadians and have spawned a range of theories.
Some purport that he has come under the influence of evangelical leaders who want him to defend Judeo-Christian heritage. Harper’s supporters scoff at the notion as groundless.
Others say it’s all about domestic politics — raising money from Jewish-Canadians for the Conservative Party and securing their vote.
The Tories helped feed that theory earlier this year when Harper brought many Tory MPs on his trip to Israel — and when one of them (York Centre MP Mark Adler) urged a PMO aide to let him get into the picture frame during Harper’s visit to the Western Wall, pleading: “It’s the re-election. This is the million-dollar shot.”
But a review of Harper’s public remarks and speeches in recent years, as well as interviews with those who know him, paint a different picture.
What motivates him? It’s about the simplicity of right and wrong, of good and evil.

http://ottawacitizen.com/news/natio...ne-why-canadas-prime-minister-supports-israel
 
Surprise coming from Massie. I would've thought, just maybe, Amash, but surprise to me. I need to read more apparently.

Also...

Directs the President to report to Congress on the feasibility and advisability of establishing a joint United States-Israel Cyber Security Center.

Yeah, that's a big red-flag in my book.
 
By "strategic partner," Israel will continue to suck on the American tax payer's teet while telling our government who to attack next. And in return, Israel will send their trolls to our forums to educate us on the trials and tribulations of the Israelis.

Thanks Israel!
 
ottawacitizen recently tried to dissect his policy stances on mideast:

The Harper Doctrine: Why Canada's prime minister supports Israel

Mark Kennedy More from Mark Kennedy
Published on: August 3, 2014

israel-canada-diplomacy.jpg
Prime Minister Stephen Harper touches the Western Wall, Judaism's holiest site in Jerusalem's old city on January 21, 2014.
AHMAD GHARABLI / GETTY Share Adjust Comment Print
On April 25, 2003, Stephen Harper appeared at a gathering of conservatives in Toronto brought together by the Civitas group.
He was leader of the Canadian Alliance party, a thankless job with little likelihood he could knock the governing Liberals from their perch.
But Harper’s speech that day, later reprinted in an essay, was remarkably prescient.
For anyone who cared to notice, it revealed how he would one day turn Canadian foreign policy on its head and, perhaps most notably, make this country the world’s most fervent ally of Israel.
Harper said Canada’s conservatives needed to “rediscover” the traditional conservatism of political philosopher Edmund Burke, which valued “social order,” custom and religious traditions.
“We need to rediscover Burkean conservatism because the emerging debates on foreign affairs should be fought on moral grounds,” said Harper.
“Current challenges in dealing with terrorism and its sponsors, as well as the emerging debate on the goals of the U.S. as the sole superpower, will be well served by conservative insights on preserving historic values and moral insights on right and wrong.”
Harper stressed that unlike the “modern left” — which had adopted a position of “moral neutrality” — conservatives understood “the notion that moral rules form a chain of right and duty, and that politics is a moral affair.”
He added: “We understand that the great geopolitical battles against modern tyrants and threats are battles over values.
“Conservatives must take the moral stand, with our allies, in favour of the fundamental values of our society, including democracy, free enterprise and individual freedom.”
Three years later, after an unanticipated meltdown of Liberal power, Harper was prime minister. He immediately launched an unshakeable foreign policy in support of Israel, beginning that summer when the Jewish state launched a military ground offensive into Lebanon to combat Hezbollah.
This summer, Harper is once again standing firmly by Israel — this time, as it responds to rocket fire from Hamas by pounding Gaza with air strikes and a ground offensive to punish the terrorist group and destroy a network of tunnels it has built to launch attacks into Israel.
More than 1,700 Palestinians, most of them non-combatant civilians, have been killed.
The United Nations Works and Relief Agency has accused Israel of committing a “serious violation” of international law after civilians were killed from the Israeli shelling of a UN designated building sheltering Palestinians, including many children.
By comparison, Harper has accused Hamas of being responsible for all the bloodshed.
Supporters praise him for his “clarity,” while critics castigate him for a simplistic approach to a complex issue. They say he has overlooked the aspirations of Palestinians who want their own homeland after decades of being mistreated by an “occupying power,” Israel.
What’s behind Harper’s thinking? What are its roots? Why is he so seemingly single-minded?
The questions perplex some Canadians and have spawned a range of theories.
Some purport that he has come under the influence of evangelical leaders who want him to defend Judeo-Christian heritage. Harper’s supporters scoff at the notion as groundless.
Others say it’s all about domestic politics — raising money from Jewish-Canadians for the Conservative Party and securing their vote.
The Tories helped feed that theory earlier this year when Harper brought many Tory MPs on his trip to Israel — and when one of them (York Centre MP Mark Adler) urged a PMO aide to let him get into the picture frame during Harper’s visit to the Western Wall, pleading: “It’s the re-election. This is the million-dollar shot.”
But a review of Harper’s public remarks and speeches in recent years, as well as interviews with those who know him, paint a different picture.
What motivates him? It’s about the simplicity of right and wrong, of good and evil.

http://ottawacitizen.com/news/natio...ne-why-canadas-prime-minister-supports-israel

1. Are they so stupid that they don't know they're being used?

2. Do they think that we're so stupid that we don't know we're being used?

I don't get it, it doesn't take an intellectual to realize that Israel and Saudi Arabia are using our military and manipulating our foreign policy, while stabbing US citizens in the back.

So my answer--yes on both questions.
 
Back
Top