So, because he wants to begin by limiting the Fed, that means he wants to sustain the fed? Does that mean Ron's bill that proposes simply an audit suddenly mean he doesn't want to end the fed?
You might not understand this because you're a blind idiot, but one step in the right direction, or many steps in the right direction, doesn't mean GJ doesn't advocate abolishing the Fed. As I've stated, his latest ad is about living free of the fed. However, you have to start somewhere.
Show me how it's possible to fully shut down the fed on day one. Ron Paul himself has conceded it's not possible. You HAVE to start somewhere, and that doesn't mean GJ is in favor of the fed.
I'll take it ANOTHER step further. Rand and Amash must be in support of the fed as well. Neither has introduced legislation to abolish the fed. Actually, Rand's never even talked about ending it, just making it transparent. GASP!
Show me one piece of legislation Ron has proposed about limiting the Fed that actually made it as far as his lesser and most recent step to audit the fed. That's right, you can't. You have to start SOMEWHERE. GJ realized this, and Ron Paul just realized this, albeit too late. It would have been nice if he had an audit the fed bill earlier in his long congressional career.
Using your flawed logic, we might as well go on Ron Paul's site and claim he's in support of the fed, more so than GJ! All his issues page calls for is auditing the fed, not even restricting their power. Therefore, Ron must be in support of the fed, right? :Rolleyes:
Again, to reiterate the holes in your argument.
1. Show me where GJ has authorized a tax increase. (you still haven't provided evidence, yet make the claim)
2. Show me all of the non-violent drug offenders that engaged in the process for a pardon. Further, show me the majority of New Mexico's prison population is non-violent drug offenders. Finally, tell me what you would have done to address the the expenditure on the judicial system.
Would you have paid other states to house your prisoners or saved the taxpayers money by doing it in state. Let me remind you, as governor you DO NOT have the authority to wave a wand and set 50% of the prison population free. There is an application process for pardons, so I'd REALLY like to know what you feel is the "libertarian" way to address that problem. I want to know exactly what portion of the population was pardonable, who applied for the pardon,
if Gary Johnson DENIED any individual's request for a pardon.
Hell, ignore everything else but the number 2 section of my post. I want to hear how a "die hard" libertarian would handle that situation. Just remember, you can't rewrite the law. Let's hear it. You can chime in or anyone else can.
rockandrollsouls, the first time you called me a smartass, I ignored it, yesterday you called me a jackass. Today, I retaliate. You are a dumbass.
Gary Johnson is a prison building, tax increasing, libertarian. That is an oxymoron. Libertarians are against putting people in prison except for assault. Libertarians are against counterfeiters printing money and controlling society.
htp://www.garyjohnson2012.com/issues/economy-and-taxes
That is the opposite of sound money principles.
