Hillary Clinton Will Be in Jail by TOMORROW if Rand Paul Is Right!

So anyways, as is quite easy to observe, most mammals, social or not, have alpha males. That is science. Humans are mammals, that is also science. An alpha male will have many females, Trump owns two beauty pageants. He is a multi multi millionaire. He has a brash personality and does not apologize for who he is. he is, in every sense of the word, a human alpha male.

And people flock to alpha males.

I am sorry if you think this ridiculous, because you want your definition of alpha to be alpha, so you can convince yourself you are alpha. Whatever. It is pretty common for most men to consider their definition of manliness to be manly. it's a matter of persepctive, btu from a point of science, generally the alpha has multiple desirable females, and gets the share of the resources, as well as command over the flock/pride/pack what have you. Trump is a boss, he has women, and he has cash. He is alpha.

Period. Deal with it.

And I was saying this to explain why he is so good at winning. Non-alpha can win, but it takes way more effort for them to win.

We've got our first MRA/MGTOW here on the forum, brining his bad logic with him. So, you probably wouldn't actually support Ron Paul if he ran today because he's not "alpha", am I right?

Believe it or not, the world isn't run by 16-25-year-old girls who are going to flock to Rand (or you) if he just becomes alpha by your definition of alpha.

If you want some real red pill science, here it is:

Your first error:

Most mammals, social or not, have alpha males. Not so with bonobos, and I highly recommend you read this article regarding a troup of baboons.

Moreover, Trump has a problem with women. Minorities and women don't want to vote for Trump, and a lot of it has to do with the attributes you assign to his "alpha" status. By your own logic, Trump should be winning with every demograph except for jealous beta males. Instead, the only reason he's doing as well as he is is because Clinton is so awful by comparison!

Here's the thing: if Rand had gotten this nomination, he'd be beating Clinton right now. Yes, even with his smiles and such, just like Ron would have beaten Obama, even with his ill-fitting suits and one eyebrow that's trying to come unglued during the debates.

Trump would be losing in a landslide if his opponent was literally anyone other than Hillary.

With that said, Hillary is still not in jail and Rand is doing just fine without OP's advice.
 
We've got our first MRA/MGTOW.

Wrong. Sit down, STFU.

So, you probably wouldn't actually support Ron Paul if he ran today because he's not "alpha", am I right?

So you probably blah blah blah blah blah So you probably blah blah blah blah Probably blah blah blah blah I bet you blah blah blah So that probably means blah blah blah blah blah, right?

Sit down and STFU.

Moreover, Trump has a problem with women. Minorities and women don't want to vote for Trump, and a lot of it has to do with the attributes you assign to his "alpha" status.

Wrong. He is doing better than Romney with women, and better than any republican since the 1950's with black people. Sit down and STFU.
Believe it or not, the world isn't run by 16-25-year-old girls who are going to flock to Rand (or you) if he just becomes alpha by your definition of alpha.
Anyways, I never claimed to be alpha. If you had read before blabbered drool smarter than your brain, you would have seen that in this very thread.

So Sit down and STFU.

Not so with bonobos,

I say "most", you bring me an exception to the rule, and then claim you are the scientific one with the "real red pill."

SIT

DOWN

& STFU

Chump.
 
Last edited:
[T]he Queen said[,] "The rule is, jam tomorrow and jam yesterday - but never jam today."

"It must come sometimes to 'jam today'," Alice objected.

"No, it can't," said the Queen. "It's jam every other day: today isn't any other day, you know."

"I don't understand you," said Alice. "It's dreadfully confusing!"

-- Lewis Carroll, Through the Looking-Glass

Red Queen to Alice, “Tell me what you did tomorrow?”

Alice: “Well that is impossible, nobody can tell you what they did tomorrow. Tomorrow hasn’t happened yet”.

Red Queen, rather pityingly to Alice, “Well it’s a pretty poor memory that only works in one direction”.
 
lol is it tomorrow yet? :D

HEStspd.jpg
 
Video killed the radio star.

(and then video committed hari kari, but that's another story altogether)
 
...many numbskull republicans continue to push the hoax that stinking trump is better for 'liberty' than stinking clinton... :rolleyes:

...many numbskull republicans continue to push the hoax that stinking reagan--who signed virtually every $pending bill on the way to a tripling of the debt---was a 'liberty' politician... :rolleyes:

....stinking trump has already promised to 'rebuild the military' (presumably because we don't $pend enough) despite the hideou$ reality of a military so bloated and overbuilt only a blind goddamned fool can't see it...

...it seems to me anyone who thinks the stinking republican trump is going to bring any semblance of 'liberty' :rolleyes: is quite goddamned foolish..probably from the same republican cloth as people who condemn obomba for doubling the debt while their goddamned fool hero reagan tripled the debt...all while they screech like idiots about 'big bad government'...:rolleyes:

...hush up, republiclowns...you're making @sses of yourselves...turn off the radio and think for yourselves...for once...

[do yourselves a favor and learn a little about the hideous monetary order under which you are en$laved--an order about which your stinking trump has not peeped--...maybe read jerry voorhis' 'out of debt out of danger'...put away the blowhard ludwigging theorie$ and GET REAL] :cool:
 
...many numbskull republicans continue to push the hoax that stinking trump is better for 'liberty' than stinking clinton... :rolleyes:

...many numbskull republicans continue to push the hoax that stinking reagan--who signed virtually every $pending bill on the way to a tripling of the debt---was a 'liberty' politician... :rolleyes:

....stinking trump has already promised to 'rebuild the military' (presumably because we don't $pend enough) despite the hideou$ reality of a military so bloated and overbuilt only a blind goddamned fool can't see it...

...it seems to me anyone who thinks the stinking republican trump is going to bring any semblance of 'liberty' :rolleyes: is quite goddamned foolish..probably from the same republican cloth as people who condemn obomba for doubling the debt while their goddamned fool hero reagan tripled the debt...all while they screech like idiots about 'big bad government'...:rolleyes:

...hush up, republiclowns...you're making @sses of yourselves...turn off the radio and think for yourselves...for once...

[do yourselves a favor and learn a little about the hideous monetary order under which you are en$laved--an order about which your stinking trump has not peeped--...maybe read jerry voorhis' 'out of debt out of danger'...put away the blowhard ludwigging theorie$ and GET REAL] :cool:
well..

Trump's authoritarianism > Hillary sending us to war. There are definitely reasons to SUPPORT Trump OVER Hillary.

Now, voting is pointless, so I encourage everybody to write in Ron Paul. But I sure hope Hillary doesn't win. I will be the first one sent to war (as I just turned 18)
 
well..

Trump's authoritarianism > Hillary sending us to war. There are definitely reasons to SUPPORT Trump OVER Hillary.

Now, voting is pointless, so I encourage everybody to write in Ron Paul. But I sure hope Hillary doesn't win. I will be the first one sent to war (as I just turned 18)

Any authoritarianism of the chief executive of the nation should be checked by Congress, as the Founders intended this government to be.
I'd rather see Trump shake up the status quo some, just as probably the GOP would have been split as well if RP had been the nominee in 2008 imo.

Trump has created some jobs through business . . . Hilly has created jobs/workload for at least the FBI since the 1990's of course.
 
Back
Top